Pt(II) Antitumor Complexes with Sulfur Ligands
Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 37, No. 4, 1998 723
the bifunctional adducts cis-[Pt(NH3)2(Guo)2]2+ (k ≈ 10-5 s-1 30
and cis-[Pt(NH3)2(5′-GMP)2];31 (ii) thiourea is used as a
mechanistic probe which traps monofunctional Pt-DNA adducts
and as a reagent that effectively removes Pt from DNA.32 At
least in the case of cis-DDP related drugs, the critical lesion
that leads to cytotoxicity is thought to be the 1,2 intrastrand
cross-link of guanine bases. We therefore suggest that the
inability of 1 and 2 to form this adduct could be the reason for
the observed inactivity of these complexes in vitro. Mono-
functional Pt-DNA adducts such as those formed by the
inactive complex [PtCl(dien)]+ (dien ) diethylenetriamine) are
known to be ineffective in blocking DNA replication.33
The ligand properties of tmtu clearly distinguish 1 and 2 from
analogous cationic complexes [PtCl(diamine)(SORR′)]+ which
carry a (chiral) S-bound sulfoxide ligand. The substitution
lability of the latter sulfur ligands is undoubtedly a prerequisite
for the biological activity of these species.4,5,7 At this point, a
comparison of ligand properties of different sulfur nucleophiles
that are relevant to platinum antitumor chemistry seems
worthwhile. It appears that in these systems ligands with
π-acceptor properties34,35 (thioether, sulfoxide) are substituted
by N7 of guanine to give the thermodynamically more stable
Pt-nucleobase adduct. The distinct reactivity of the Pt-Sthioether
bond in Pt-methionine adducts in competition reactions with
guanine-N7 and the possible biological implications should be
noted.36,37 On the other hand, for sulfur ligands that lack
acceptor properties but are strong (σ and π) donors, such as
thiourea12,38 and thiolate,39 obviously the reverse reactivity is
observed.
The rationale behind the development of the dinuclear
complexes 3 and 4 was that these would act as cross-linking
agents with the two platinum subsites binding monofunctionally
to DNA. This is a well-established binding mode for analogous
complexes of the formula [{PtCl(NH3)2}2(H2N-R-NH2)]2+ (R
) linear aliphatic chain), which allows the targeting of larger
DNA sequences for bifunctional adduct formation.6 Accord-
ingly, in 3 and 4 the bridging thiourea derivatives should act as
tightly bound, nonreplaceable spacers that determine the “bite”
on DNA. Initial nucleotide-binding studies on 3 and 4 were
performed to monitor the ability of these complexes to form
stable dinuclear units containing the motif [N7-Pt-{µ-bis-
(thiourea)-S,S′}-Pt-N7]. Although reactions with r(GpG)
)
should also yield information about the geometric requirements
for the specific 1,2 intrastrand cross-link for these complexes,
it was not the intention of this study to favor or disfavor this
adduct over alternative long-range adducts.
In reactions between 3 and the nucleotides, both 5′-GMP and
r(GpG) exclusively react with [PtCl2(en)], the rapidly formed
and most reactive species in the reaction media. The short half-
life of 3 under the conditions of the nucleotide-binding
experiments apparently controls the nature of the final adducts.
For this reason, the formation of a “macrochelate” with dinuclear
3 coordinating to the dinucleotide seems unfavorable, irrespec-
tive of the stereochemical feasibility of this adduct. In vitro
cytotoxicity data for 3 are in agreement with [PtCl2(en)] being
the only biologically active species. The results may also
explain the observed cross-resistance of 3 to cisplatin, based
on a similar mechanism of action and an identical array of DNA
adducts for [PtCl2(en)]. Despite the increased stability of the
analogous dinuclear complex 4 and the ability to form a stable
macrochelate (at least in our model studies), an overall similar
activity is found in L1210 leukemia. The cytotoxicity data for
4 imply that in this case mononuclear [PtCl2(en)] also is the
only “surviving” species that reaches the target DNA but
basically do not rule out the possibility of bifunctional adducts
of (intact) 4 with DNA in vitro. The frequency of such cross-
links may be low and/or these adducts may not significantly
contribute to the biological activity of 4.
Conclusions and Perspectives
The specific incorporation of thiourea derivatives as S-donor
ligands into platinum antitumor complexes drastically changes
the reactivity of the Pt(II) center toward the biologically relevant
target guanine-N7. Tmtu in [PtCl(en)(tmtu)]NO3 (1) and [PtCl-
(dach)(tmtu)]NO3 (2) behaves as a typical nonleaving group due
to the thermodynamic stability of the Pt-S bond. Although
undesired in the case of 1 and 2, this structural motif proves to
be extremely valuable for the design of the dinuclear species 3
and 4, where platinum has the same ligand environment.
However the inherent reactivity of these species appears to be
unfavorable for their use as anticancer drugs. Our ongoing
research will focus on how the mononuclear compounds can
be activated despite their monofunctional covalent binding mode
and on structural modifications of the dinuclear compounds to
increase their stability. With the use of bis(thiourea) ligands
that are conformationally more rigid than those in 3 and 4, it
should be possible to avoid chelation of a single Pt center and
consequently intramolecular disproportionation.
(30) Beaty, J. A.; Jones, M. M. Inorg. Chem. 1992, 31, 2547.
(31) Urata, H.; Akagi, M. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1989, 161,
819.
(32) Farrell, N. In Transition Metal Complexes as Drugs and Chemothera-
peutic Agents; Ugo, R., James, B. R., Eds.; Kluwer: Dordrecht, The
Netherlands, 1989; Chapter 2 and literature cited therein.
(33) Bruhn, S. L.; Toney, J. H.; Lippard, S. J. In Progress in Inorganic
Chemistry: Bioinorganic Chemistry; Lippard, S. J., Ed.; Wiley: New
York, 1990; pp 495-505.
(34) Murray, S. G.; Hartley, F. R. Chem. ReV. 1981, 81, 365.
(35) Davies, J. A. AdV. Inorg. Chem. Radiochem. 1981, 24, 115.
(36) Barnham, K. J.; Djuran, M. I.; Murdoch, P. d. S.; Sadler, P. J. J. Chem.
Soc., Chem. Commun. 1994, 721.
(37) Barnham, K. J.; Djuran, M. I.; Murdoch, P. d. S.; Ranford, J. D.; Sadler,
P. J. Inorg. Chem. 1996, 35, 1065.
(38) Bierbach, U.; Barklage, W.; Saak, W.; Pohl, S. Z. Naturforsch. 1992,
47B, 1593.
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by a research
fellowship (to U.B.) from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
(DFG, Bonn, Germany) and by the American Cancer Society
(Grant No. DHP-2E). We thank S. Kelemen and J. Peroutka
for their technical assistance in obtaining cytotoxicity data.
Thanks are also expressed to W. C. Heraeus GmbH (Hanau,
Germany) for a generous loan of K2[PtCl4].
Supporting Information Available: A plot of chemical shift of
H8 vs pH* for [Pt(en)(5′-GMP-N7)(tmtu)] (adduct I) (1 page).
Ordering information is given on any current masthead page.
(39) Ashby, M. T. Comments Inorg. Chem. 1990, 10, 297.
IC970421Q