hydroxy function. Substitution by sulfur as before gave ligand 4
in 84% yield over three steps. Treatment of 7 with LAH gave
alcohol 10 in 93% yield which was converted to the phenylthiol
ligand 5 by heating in a sealed tube with diphenyl disulfide and
tri-n-butylphosphine in 75% yield.9
Dibenzylation of (S)-valinol was achieved by treatment with
benzyl bromide and potassium carbonate in 91% yield.
Dialkylation of the amine function of (S)-valinol with 1,5-di-
bromopentane, under similar conditions, proceeded in 78%
yield to form a piperidine. Substitution of the hydroxy function
in each of these compounds by the aforementioned method gave
ligands 2 and 3 in 81 and 72% yield, respectively (Scheme 1).
The enantiohomogeneity of these ligands has been verified by
racemic synthesis followed by NMR and HPLC comparison of
their Mosher derivatives with the enantiomerically pure mate-
rials.
With these ligands in hand we screened their effectiveness as
enantioselective catalysts in the addition of diethylzinc to
aromatic aldehydes. Our initial experiments in this area are
promising, as summarised in Table 1, and show good levels of
enantioinduction in the presence of catalytic amounts (10
mol%) of the ligands 1–5. Reactions were performed in toluene,
at room temperature, for 3–20 h using 2.2 equiv. of di-
ethylzinc.
These preliminary studies indicate that giving the nitrogen
atom the potential to become stereogenic leads to a better
system for enantioselection, as evidenced by the superior
enantioselection of ligands 1 and 4 over 2 and 3 respectively.
The best enantioselection (82% ee, entries 8 and 9) found with
ligand 4 suggests that the donating ability of the nitrogen lone
pair could be a factor in the efficiency of these ligands. This
necessitates the need for further studies to try and separate the
steric and electronic factors that are responsible for enhanced
enantioselection. Ligands having a labile proton on nitrogen
perform very poorly as catalysts in this particular reaction and
along with the desired addition product, benzyl alcohol (38%)
was formed from reduction of benzaldehyde.10 These results
show that non-symmetrical phenyl-substituted nitrogen donor
atoms have a positive effect on the efficiency of these particular
ligand systems. We believe we have a system with which we
can probe the origins of chiral induction by further manipulation
of the steric and electronic properties of these ligands. Further
systematic modifications, studies designed to describe a
transition state model and investigation of other metal catalysed
systems will be reported in due course.
We thank the EPSRC (M. H.), the University of Sheffield,
Pfizer and Zeneca for financial support. The loan of GC
equipment from Dr Varinder K. Aggarwal and the help of Dr
Elfyn Jones with GC is gratefully acknowledged.
Notes and References
† E-mail: j.anderson@sheffield.ac.uk
‡ These original assumptions have been supported by other workers (ref.
11).
§ A similar transmission of chirality occurs in the successful chiral
diphosphine ligand chiraphos in various asymmetric palladium catalysed
reactions (ref. 12).
¶ A similar conformational analysis has been invoked to explain the
excellent enantioselectivities obtained in Diels–Alder reactions using an
enantiomerically pure [N,NA-bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)-1,2-diphenyl-
ethane-1,2-diamine]aluminium complex as catalyst (ref. 13).
∑
In each case a positive rotation was obtained, indicating the
(R)-enantiomer (ref. 14).
1 R. P. Hof, M. A. Poelert, N. C. M. W. Peper and R. M. Kellog,
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 1994, 5, 31.
2 J. Kang, J. W. Lee and J. I. Kim, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1994,
2009.
Table 1 Diethylzinc additions to aromatic aldehydes catalysed by chelate
ligands 1–5
3 J. Kang, D. S. Kim and J. I. Kim, Synlett, 1994, 842.
4 E. Rijnberg, J. T. B. H. Jastrzebski, M. D. Janssen, J. Boersma and
G. van Koten, Tetrahedron Lett., 1994, 35, 6521.
5 M. J. McKennon, A. I. Meyers, K. Drauz and M. Schwarm, J. Org.
Chem., 1993, 58, 3568.
O
OH
Et
Et2Zn, 1–5 (10 mol%)
toluene, room temp.
Ar
H
Ar
6 A. S. Guram, R. A. Rennels and S. L. Buchwald, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
Engl., 1995, 34, 1348; J. Louie and J. F. Hartwig, Tetrahedron Lett.,
1995, 36, 3609; D.Ma and J. Yao, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 1996, 7,
3075.
7 D. H. R. Barton, J.-P. Finet and J. Khamsi, Tetrahedron Lett., 1989, 30,
937.
8 S. Krishnamurthy, Tetrahedron Lett., 1982, 23, 3315.
9 R. Siedlecka and J. Swarzewski, Synlett, 1996, 757.
10 B. Marx, E. Henry-Basch and P. Freon, C. R. Acad. Sci., Ser., 1967,
264.
11 J. Kang, J. B. Kim, J. W. Kim and D. Lee, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans.
2, 1997, 189.
Entry
Ligand
Ar
Yield (%)a
Ee (%)b
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
1
1
2
3
3
3
4
4
4
5
Ph
85
88
91
91
78
92
100
80
74
52
62
58
66
65
62
82
82
78
0
o-MeOC6H4
p-MeOC6H4
Ph
Ph
o-MeOC6H4
p-MeOC6H4
Ph
o-MeOC6H4
p-MeOC6H4
Ph
83
90
35c
12 B. Bosnich and M. D. Fryzuch, in Topics in Stereochemistry, ed. G. L.
Geoffroy, Wiley, 1981, vol. 12, p. 119 (see pp. 121–125).
13 E. J. Corey, R. Imwinkelried, S. Pikul and Y. B. Xiang, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 1989, 111, 5493.
10
11
Isolated yield. Determined by chiral GLC using a ChrompackTM CP-
Cyclodex B column or optical rotation (see note ∑). Reaction time 3
days.
a
b
14 R. H. Pickard and J. Kenyon, J. Chem. Soc., 1914, 1115.
c
Received in Cambridge, UK, 4th November 1997; 7/07937K
394
Chem. Commun., 1998