2464 J . Org. Chem., Vol. 63, No. 8, 1998
Pie´tri et al.
The electronic excited-state energies and wave functions
were evaluated using the CI-single (CIS) configuration ap-
proach which models an excited state as a combination of
single excitations from the Hartree-Fock ground state16
adapted to large systems. A certain portion of CI is actually
included, but the computational effort is less formidable.
Although CIS was originally developed for organic molecules,17a
Sch em e 2
it has been successfully tested for the computation of electronic
17b
absorption spectra of fairly large clusters such as Na18Cl17
.
Resu lts a n d Discu ssion
The involved compounds and the reaction paths are
depicted in Scheme 1. Photolysis experiments were
monitored by FT-IR spectroscopy. Reaction compounds
were identified by comparison of their experimental IR
spectra with literature data. For the 3-chloro-1,2-pro-
penone, the experimental spectra was compared with
simulated spectra obtained by ab initio force field calcu-
lations using the MP2/6-31G* basis set.
can be speculated that the RHF/6-31G* calculations
overestimate the steric repulsion between the chloride
and the vinyl hydrogen in the s-trans conformation.
Nevertheless, there are small differences between the
geometries calculated at the different computational
levels.
The FT-IR spectra were systematically recorded at
different times during the photolysis process. As the
integrated intensities of numerous absorption bands were
plotted versus time, we were able to detect those having
identical behavior, indicating that they belong to the
same product. The distinction between 1 s-cis and 1
s-trans infrared spectra was confirmed by observing the
opposite behavior of the two sets of absorption bands
during the irradiation experiments which reveals the
occurrence of a photoisomerization process.
P h otolysis Exp er im en ts. When matrix-isolated 1 is
submitted to a broad band irradiation, with high-pressure
Hg lamp, filtered at λ > 310 nm in its nfπ* electronic
absorption band, we observe the decrease of 1 s-trans IR
absorption bands and the increase of 1 s-cis absorption
bands. The photochemical behavior of the two conform-
ers of acryloyl chloride in argon matrix is reported in
Figure 1 and the evolution of the integrated absorbances
versus time in Figure 2.
Vibr a tion a l An a lysis of 1 Isola ted in Ar gon Ma -
tr ixes. Prior to photolysis experiments, the experimen-
tal spectrum of 1 was carefully studied in order to
distinguish between the conformer spectra. This com-
pound adopts two conformations by rotation around the
carbon-carbon single bond: the 1 s-trans and 1 s-cis
conformers for which the dihedral angle CdC-CdO is
equal to 180° and 0°, respectively.18 The evolution of the
infrared spectrum of 1, from the liquid to the low-
temperature solid at 178 K, shows that the 1-s-trans
conformer is more stable.
In our experiments, the infrared spectrum, obtained
after deposition at 20 K, features the characteristic
absorption bands of the two conformers, with multiplet
structure arising from alternative trapping sites. The
conformational preference, determined using the two
carbon chloride stretching vibration is clearly for the s-cis
conformer, and the ratio of the two conformers (K (s-cis/
s-trans) ≈ 1.4) is similar to those obtained between 276
and 361 K by Katon et al. in the gaseous phase.18b
Our ab initio calculations, at the MP2/6-31G* level,
which show that the s-cis conformer is the most stable
(∆E s-cis - s-trans ) -0.37 kcal/mol), are in good
agreement with the ones obtained by Garcia et al.19
These authors have performed ab initio calculations at
different computational levels in order to study the s-cis/
s-trans conformational preference. These results show
that the calculated ∆E values are dependent on the
computational level (-0.57 and 0.1 kcal/mol using RHF/
6-31G* and MP3/6-311++G** levels, respectively). It
Under irradiation, new absorption bands appear in
different areas of the spectra. In particular, we observe
new strong absorption bands growing at 2149 and 2139
cm-1, indicative of the presence of νCdCdO stretching
mode. The lack of νHCl absorption bands around 2870
cm-1 and characteristic νCCCO20 and νCO21 vibration bands
of compounds 2 and 3, at 2125 and 1835-1870 cm-1
,
respectively, rule out the occurrence of the deshydrochlo-
rination process. It further suggests that irradiation
induces 1,3 migration of the chlorine atom to form 4 as
primary photoproduct. This intermediate reaches a
photochemical steady state with 1 conformers.
To unambiguously identify 4 as the primary photo-
product, we carried out an other experiment: the irradia-
tion of 3-chloropropanoyl chloride (ClCH2CH2COCl)
trapped in argon matrix at 10 K (Scheme 2). Broad band
filtered irradiation at λ > 230 nm of 3-chloropropanoyl
chloride embedded in argon matrix induces the formation
(12) Allouche, A.; Pourcin, J . Spectrochim. Acta 1993, 49A, 571.
(13) Liotard, D. A.; Heally, E. H.; Ruiz, J . M.; Dewar, M. J . S.
AMPAC Manual, version 2, 1. A General Molecular Orbital Package,
1989, University of Texas: Austin, TX.
(14) Stewart, J . J . P. J . Comput. Chem. 1989, 10, 209.
(15) (a) Schlegel, A. B. J . Comput. Chem. 1982, 3, 214. (b) Frish, M.
J .; Foresman, J . B.; Frish, Æ., Appendix IV, Gaussian 92 User’s guide,
Gaussian Inc. Pittsburgh, PA, 1992.
(16) Foresman, J . B.; Head-Gordon, M.; Pople, J . A.; Frish, M. J . J .
Phys. Chem. 1992, 96, 135.
(17) (a) Allouche, A. J . Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 17915. (b) Ochsen-
fields, C.; Gauss, J .; Ahlrichs, R. J . Chem. Phys. 1995, 103, 7401.
(18) (a) Kataoka, T.; Shimada, H.; Shimada, R. Mem. Fac. Sci.,
Kyushu Univ., Ser. C 1982, 13, 261. (b) Katon, J . E.; Feairheller, W.
R., J r. J . Chem. Phys. 1967, 47, 1248. (c) Hagen, K.; Hedberg, K. J .
Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 6150. (d) Durig, J . R.; Church, J . S.;
Compton, D. A. C. J . Chem. Phys. 1979, 71, 1175. (e) Durig, J . R.;
Berny, R. J .; Groner, P. J . Chem. Phys. 1987, 87, 6303.
(19) Garcia, J . I.; Mayoral, J . A.; Salvatella, L.; Assfeld, X.; Ruiz-
Lopez, M. F. J . Mol. Struct. 1996, 187, 362.
(20) Chapman, O. L.;. Miller, M. D.; Pitzenberger, S. M. J . Am.
Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 6867.
(21) (a) Breslow, R; Ryan, G. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89, 3072. (b)
Potts, K. T.; Baum, J . S. Chem. Rev. 1974, 74, 189.