Pd(II) and Pt(II) Schiff-Base Complexes
Organometallics, Vol. 17, No. 9, 1998 1755
solution creates Maker fringes, whose amplitude and periodic-
ity are related to the nonlinearity of the solution. The
experiment was performed for each compound, by using
solutions of increasing concentrations (x ) 10-4-5 × 10-3 mol/
L) in chloroform.
The ground-state dipole moment was determined by the
standard method of Guggenheim.27 Further details of the
experimental methodology and data analyses are reported
elsewhere.28
Representative preparation procedures are given below as
the syntheses were similar for the rest of the complexes.
Spectral and analytical data for all compounds have been
included as Supporting Information.
tions, in hkl range (-12, -14, 0) to (12, 15, 19) and θ limits 0
< θ < 23° were measured, using the ω-2θ scan technique and
a variable scan rate with a maximum scan time of 60 s per
reflection. The intensity of the primary beam was checked
throughout the data collection by monitoring three standard
reflections every 60 min. The final drift correction factors were
between 0.983 and 1.048. On all reflections a profile analysis
was performed.29,30 Some double measured reflections were
averaged Rint ) ∑I - I /∑I ) 0.0394 resulting in 6863 “unique”
reflections of which only 3289 were observed with I > 2σ(I).
Lorentz and polarization corrections were applied, and the
data were reduced to ΩFoΩ values. The structure was solved
by Patterson methods and phase expansion using DIRDIF.31
Isotropic least-squares refinement on F2 was made using
SHELXL93.32 At this stage an empirical absorption correction
was applied using XABS.33 The relative maximum and
minimum transmision factors were respectively 0.595 and
1.000.
[M2(µ-SR)(µ-Cl)(Ln )2] (4, 5). To a suspension of 2 or 3
(0.296 mmol) in 30 mL of dichloromethane was added the
corresponding AgSR (0.300 mmol). The mixture was stirred
in the dark for 12 h at room temperature. After the AgCl
precipitate was filtered off, ethanol (10 mL) was added, and
the resulting solution was concentrated to a small volume on
a rotary evaporator. A solid appeared which was filtered off,
washed with ethanol (2 × 3 mL), and air-dried.
During the final stages of the refinement the positional
parameters and the anisotropic thermal parameters of the
non-H atoms were refined. All non-hydrogen atoms were
anisotropically refined. All hydrogen atoms were geometrically
placed. The final conventional agreement factors were R )
[P d 2(µ-SC8H17)(µ-OAc)(Ln )2] (6). To a solution of 2 (0.192
mmol) in 20 mL of dichloromethane was added silver acetate
(0.320 g, 0.192 mmol). The workup was as described above
affording compounds 6a -d .
0.0384 and wR2 ) 0.080 for the 3289 “observed” reflections
2
and 580 variables. The function minimized was [∑w(Fo
-
[M2(µ-SC8H17)(µ-(R)-ClP r )(Ln )2] (7, 8). A mixture of 2
(0.115 mmol) and potassium (R)-2-chloropropionate (0.126
mmol) in dichloromethane/acetone (2:1, 30 mL) was stirred for
24 h at room temperature. After removal of the precipitate
by filtration, the resulting solution was concentrated to dry-
ness. The residue was triturated in a mixture of dichlo-
romethane/methanol (1:3) to obtain a solid, which was filtered
out, washed with 2 × 3 mL of methanol, and air-dried.
[P d Cp Ln ] (9). TlCp (0.030 g, 0.111 mmol) was added to a
suspension of 2 (0.101 mmol) in 20 mL of dichloromethane.
The mixture was stirred in the dark for 10 h at room
temperature. The solution was filtered through Kieselguhr
and evaporated to ca. 3 mL under reduced pressure. Addition
of ethanol afforded 9 as an orange-red solid, which was filtered
out and washed with 2 × 3 mL of ethanol.
Fc2)2/∑w(Fo2)2]1/2, with w ) 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0315P)2 + 2.59P],
σ(Fo2) from counting statistics, and P ) (Max(Fo2,0) + 2Fc2)/3.
The final difference Fourier map showed no peaks higher than
0.458 e Å-3 nor deeper than -0.578 e Å-3
. Figure 1 shows
the atomic numbering scheme.34
Atomic scattering factors were taken from ref 35. Geo-
metrical calculations were made with PARST.36 All calcula-
tions were made at the University of Oviedo on the Scientific
Computer Center and X-ray group VAX computers.
Ack n ow led gm en t. The authors in Valladolid are
indebted to the Comisio´n Interministerial de Ciencia y
Tecnolog´ıa (Project MAT96-0708) and to the J unta de
Castilla y Leo´n (Project VA23/97) for financial support,
S.G.-G. and A.T. thank the DGICYT for support (Project
PB96-0556) .
[P d (a ca c)Ln ] (10). To a suspension of 2 (0.192 mmol) in
20 mL of dichloromethane was added the stoichiometric
amount of [Tl(acac)] (0.384 mmol). After the mixture was
stirred for 2 h, the white precipitate of TlCl was filtered off,
the solution was evaporated to dryness, and the residue was
stirred with 10 mL of ethanol to give the complexes.
[P d Ln (CNR)Cl] (11-15). To a suspension of 2 (0.101
mmol) in 20 mL of dichloromethane was added the corre-
sponding isonitrile CNR (0.212 mmol). The precipitate im-
mediately disappeared, and the resulting solution was stirred
for 15 min. The solvent was taken off under reduced pressure,
and the residue was stirred with ethyl ether to obtain a solid,
which was filtered off, washed with 2 × 3 mL of ethyl ether
and air-dried.
X-r a y Cr ysta llogr a p h ic An a lysis of 6d . Details of the
structure analysis are listed in Table 1. X-ray diffraction
measurements were performed on a single crystal of size 0.17
× 0.26 × 0.10 mm. Throughout the experiment Mo KR
radiation was used with a graphite crystal monochromator on
an Enraf-Nonius CAD4 single-crystal diffractometer (λ )
0.710 73 Å). The unit cell dimensions were determined from
the angular settings of 25 reflections with θ between 7 and
10°. The space group was determined to be P1h, from the
structure determination. The intensity data of 7208 reflec-
Su p p or tin g In for m a tion Ava ila ble: Tables of yields,
elemental analyses, and IR and NMR data and, for the crystal
structure of 6d , complete tables of atomic coordinates, thermal
parameters, bond distances and angles, and least-squares
planes and atomic deviations therefrom (20 pages). Ordering
information is given on any current masthead page.
OM9708900
(29) Lehman, M. S.; Larsen, F. K. Acta Crystallogr. 1974, A30, 580-
584.
(30) Grant, D. F.; Gabe, E. J . J . Appl. Crystallogr. 1978, 11, 114-
120.
(31) Beurskens, P. T.; Admiraall, G.; Beurskens, G.; Bosman, W.
P.; Garc´ıa-Granda, S.; Gould, R. O.; Smits, J . M. M.; Smykalla, C.
DIRDIF user’s guide; Technical report; Crystallography Laboratory,
University of Nijmegen: Nijmegen, The Netherlands, 1992.
(32) Sheldrick, G. M. SHELXL93. In Crystallographic Computing
6. Ed. Flack, H. D., Parkanyi, P., Simon, K., Eds.; IUCr/Oxford U.
Press: Oxford, U.K., 1993.
(33) Parking, S.; Moezzi, B.; Hope, H. J . Appl. Crystallogr. 1995,
28, 53-56.
(34) Spek, A. L. The EUCLID package. In Computational Crystal-
lography; Sayre, D., Ed.; Clarendon Press: Oxford, U.K., 1982; p 528.
(35) International Tables for X-ray Crystallography; Kynoch Press:
Birmingham, U.K., 1974; Vol. IV (present distributor Kluwer Academic
Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands).
(27) Guggenheim, E. A. Trans. Faraday Soc. 1949, 45, 203.
(28) (a) Ledoux, I.; Zyss, J . Chem. Phys. 1982, 73, 203. (b) Barzoukas,
M.; J osse, D.; Fremaux, P.; Zyss, J .; Nicoud, J . F.; Morley, J . O. J .
Opt. Soc. Am. B 1987, 4, 977.
(36) Nardelli, M. Comput. Chem. 1983, 7, 95-98.