M. A. Walker et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 11 (2001) 1683–1685
1685
Table 1. In vitro activity (IC50) of paclitaxel analogues (nM)
found to be 6 times less potent than the parent in a
previous study.15
Compd
Tub. poly. ratioa
HCT 116
HCT VM46
A2780
1a
1b
1c
1
0.5
0.7
2.9
2.0
1.5
>118
>121
14
3.5
2.5
1.8
References and Notes
aThe ratio in the tubulin polymerization assay is the potency of the
analogue/the potency of paclitaxel. Ratios less than 1 reflect analogues
that are more potent than paclitaxel.
1. Goldspeil, B. R. Pharmacotherapy 1997, 17, 125.
2. (a) Lin, S.; Ojima, I. Expert Opin. Ther. Pat. 2000, 10, 869.
(b) Kingston, D. G. I. J. Nat. Prod. 2000, 63, 726.
3. (a) Datta, A.; Vander Velde, D. G.; Georg, G. I.; Himes,
R. H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 1985. (b) Kingston, D. G. I.;
Samaranayake, G.; Ivey, C. A. J. Nat. Prod. 1990, 53, 1.
4. Griffith, W. P.; Ley, S. V. Aldrichim. Acta 1990, 23, 13.
appears to be the first example of TBDMS removal in
the presence of a TES group.12
1
5. (a) H NMR of 3 (500 MHz, CDCl3) d ꢂ0.31 (s, 3), ꢂ0.03
Derivatization of the C20- and C7-positions of paclitaxel
has been exploited in the past to yield prodrugs and
analogues with improved activity or pharmacological
properties.13 Therefore, in order to demonstrate the
utility of our selective deprotection method we decided
to introduce additional modifications to the C10-epox-
ide analogue. Intermediate 5 was readily converted to
the corresponding C7-MOM (1c) analogue. The two-
step procedure depicted in Scheme 2 was found to afford
the MOM-ether in much higher yield than reaction of
the C7-hydroxyl with MOMCl/Et3N.
(s, 3), 0.56 (m, 6), 0.79 (s, 9), 0.91 (t, 9, J=8), 1.11 (s, 3), 1.17
(s, 3), 1.69 (s, 3), 1.77 (m, 2), 2.03 (s, 3), 2.15 (m, 1), 2,46 (m,
1), 2.49 (m, 1), 2.56 (s, 3), 3.60 (d, 1, J=7), 4.15 (d, 1, J=7),
4.20 (dd, 1, J=8, 60), 4.58 (m, 1), 4.66 (m, 1), 4.96 (d, 1, J=9),
1
5.71 (s, 1), 5.72 (s, 1), 6.12 (m, 1), 7.29–8.12 (m, 15). (b) H
NMR spectra for 4 (500 MHz, DMSO) d ꢂ0.01 (s, 3), 0.03 (s,
3), 0.53 (m, 6), 0.75 (s, 9), 0.84 (t, 9, J=8), 0.95 (s, 3), 1.04 (s,
3), 1.45 (s, 3), 1.50 (s, 3), 1.70 (m, 2), 2.17 (m, 1), 2.34 (m, 1),
2.48 (s, 3), 3.17 (d, 1, J=4), 4.14 (dd, 2, J=7, 11), 4.48 (m, 1),
4.74 (d, 1, J=8), 4.88 (m, 1), 4.93 (s, 1), 5.04 (s, 1), 5.28 (d, 1,
J=4), 5.55 (d, 1, J=8), 5.74 (m, 1), 7.24–7.98 (m, 15).
6. The assignment of this shift was established by a 2-D
HMBC spectrum showing correlation between the proton sig-
nal at C19 and the C9 carbon.
7. 2-D HMBC showed correlation between the olefin 1H
NMR signal and the C11-carbon.
8. Rahman, M. M.; Matano, Y.; Suzuki, H. Chem. Commun.
1998, 13, 1359.
Final products 1b and 1c were tested for in vitro activity
against a number of cell lines.14 IC50 values for
HCT116, a colon carcinoma derived cell line and A2780
an ovarian cell line, are comparable to paclitaxel. Inter-
estingly enough, when these compounds were tested
against a paclitaxel-resistant cell line, HCT VM46, 1c
retained activity while 1b was much less potent (Table 1).
9. The steric environment around the C10 is readily apparent
in the X-ray structure of the taxane core. See: Alstadt, T.;
Gao, Q.; Wittman, M. D.; Kadow, J. F.; Vyas, D. M. Tetra-
hedron Lett. 1998, 39, 4965.
10. Chen, S.-H.; Farina, V.; Vyas, D. M.; Doyle, T. W.; Long,
B. H.; Fairchild, C. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 2065.
11. Holton, R. A.; Kim, H.-B.; Somoza, C.; Liang, F.; Bide-
ger, R. J.; Boatman, P. D.; Shindo, M.; Smith, C. C.; Kim, S.;
Nadizadeh, H.; Suzuki, Y.; Tao, C.; Vu, P.; Tang, S.; Zhang,
P.; Murthi, K. K.; Gentile, L. N.; Liu, J. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1994, 116, 1599.
12. Nelson, T. D.; Crouch, R. D. Synthesis 1996, 1031.
13. For an example, see: Golik, J.; Wong, H. S. L.; Chen,
S. H.; Doyle, T. W.; Wright, J. J. K.; Knipe, J.; Rose, W. C.;
Casazza, A. M.; Vyas, D. M. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1996,
6, 1837.
14. H NMR of 1c (300 MHz, CDCl3) d 1.14 (s, 3), 1.19 (s, 3),
1.7 (s, 3), 1.94 (s, 3), 2.04 (m, 2), 2.32 (m, 2), 2.37 (s, 3), 2.62 (d,
1, J=7), 2.79 (m, 1), 3.28 (s, 3), 3.68 (d, 1, J=7), 4.17 (m, 3),
4.30 (m, 1), 4.43 (d, 1, J=7), 4.77 (s, 1), 4.79 (s, 1), 4.95 (d, 1,
J=9), 5.71 (d, 1, J=6), 5.81 (m, 1), 6.07 (m, 1), 7.26–8.13 (m,
15).
15. Kant, J.; O’Keeffe, W. S.; Chen, S.-C.; Farina, V.; Fair-
child, C.; Johnston, K.; Kadow, J. F.; Long, B. H.; Vyas, D.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 5543.
A convenient method for converting the C-10 position
of paclitaxel to the corresponding spiro-epoxide has
been developed. The installation of the epoxide func-
tionality using sulfonium ylide chemistry results in ste-
reospecefic ring formation along with a unique by-
product. Further manipulations at C20 or C7 can be
achieved using newly discovered methods for selective
desilylation of either position. The C10-epoxide analo-
gue of paclitaxel and the corresponding C7-MOM deri-
vative, synthesized according to this method, were
found to be equipotent to the parent in in vitro assays
measuring tubulin binding and cytotoxicity tissue cul-
ture. These results suggest that epoxidation of the C10-
position according to the current method is well toler-
ated. This would be in agreement with previous results,
which showed that the C10-position can tolerate a cer-
tain degree of modification. However, it should be
noted that the C10-methyl ether analogue of paclitaxel,
which can be considered an acyclic version of 1b, w as