2794
J . Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 2794-2795
phenylethanol are highly dependent on solvent (eq 3).
Although we have not yet been able to correlate stereose-
lectivity with any single solvent parameter, it is clear that
tert-amyl alcohol is the solvent of choice for acylations
catalyzed by 1. Interestingly, tert-amyl alcohol itself is not
acylated to any significant extent under these conditions.
Kin etic Resolu tion of Ar yla lk ylca r bin ols
Ca ta lyzed by a P la n a r -Ch ir a l Der iva tive of
DMAP : A New Ben ch m a r k for Non en zym a tic
Acyla tion
J . Craig Ruble, J ennifer Tweddell, and Gregory C. Fu*
Department of Chemistry, Massachusetts Institute of
Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
Received February 4, 1998
The kinetic resolution of alcohols by nonenzymatic acyl-
ation catalysts has been the focus of intense interest, and
within the past 2 years the first catalysts have been
described that provide useful levels of selectivity (s )
selectivity factor g 10).1,2 Members of three families of
secondary alcoholssarylalkylcarbinols,3-5 cycloalkanols,4,6
and allylic alcohols5shave now been resolved with good to
excellent enantioselection. For the kinetic resolution of
arylalkylcarbinols, the most effective and the most versatile
acylation catalyst reported to date is planar-chiral DMAP
derivative 1 (s ) 12-52; eq 1).5 In this paper, we describe
The enhanced rate of acylation in tert-amyl alcohol,
relative to the Et2O that was used in our previous study,
has important practical consequences. We had determined
earlier that the selectivity in kinetic resolutions catalyzed
by 1 is temperature dependent, with higher selectivity
observed at lower temperature. Unfortunately, acylations
using 2% catalyst in Et2O at 0 °C are too slow to be
convenient (several days), thereby precluding exploitation
of this temperature effect. On the other hand, we have
established that acylations in tert-amyl alcohol proceed at
a convenient rate at 0 °C, even using only 1% catalyst
(typically <24 h), and we have observed a marked improve-
ment in the selectivity factor under these conditions (27 f
43 for (()-1-phenylethanol). Thus, the net effect of these
studies is a tripling of selectivity (13 f 43) with one-half of
the previous catalyst loading.
modified reaction conditions under which catalyst 1 displays
greatly enhanced enantioselectivity, thereby establishing a
new benchmark for kinetic resolutions of arylalkylcarbinols
(s ) 32-95; eq 2); furthermore, we apply this system for
the first time to racemic and meso diols.
As is evident in Table 1, this substantial increase in
selectivity when kinetic resolutions with catalyst 1 are
conducted in tert-amyl alcohol at 0 °C has proved to be
general. As a point of reference, for selectivity factors
greater than 49, unreacted alcohol of greater than 99% ee
is obtained at less than 55% conversion. These kinetic
resolutions are not sensitive to small amounts of oxygen,
moisture, or adventitious impuritiessreactions run exposed
to air with unpurified reagents provide selectivities identical
to those observed for reactions run under an inert atmo-
sphere with purified reagents. To date, other nonenzymatic
acylation catalysts have been effective (s g 10) for the kinetic
resolution of only two arylalkylcarbinolssphenyl-tert-butyl-
carbinol (s ) 12-15;3 cf. entry 2) and o-tolylmethylcarbinol
(s ) 12;4 cf. entry 5).
A wide-ranging solvent study established that both the
rate and the enantioselectivity of the acylation of (()-1-
(1) Selectivity factor ) [(rate of fast-reacting enantiomer)/(rate of slow-
reacting enantiomer)]. For a review of kinetic resolution, see: Kagan, H.
B.; Fiaud, J . C. Top. Stereochem. 1988, 18, 249-330.
(2) For reviews of enantioselective acylation of alcohols by enzymes,
see: (a) Drauz, K.; Waldmann, H. Enzyme Catalysis in Organic Synthesis:
A Comprehensive Handbook; VCH: New York, 1995. (b) Wong, C.-H.;
Whitesides, G. M. Enzymes in Synthetic Organic Chemistry; Pergamon: New
York, 1994; Chapter 2. (c) Klibanov, A. M. Acc. Chem. Res. 1990, 23, 114-
120. (d) Sih, C. J .; Wu, S.-H. Top. Stereochem. 1989, 19, 63-125.
(3) Vedejs, E.; Daugulis, O.; Diver, S. T. J . Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 430-
431.
(7) Vedejs, E.; Chen, X. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 2584-2585.
(8) Procedure for
a preparative-scale reaction (eq 4): o-Tolylmethyl-
carbinol (1.11 g, 8.14 mmol), tert-amyl alcohol (16 mL), and triethylamine
(0.67 mL, 4.8 mmol) were added to a flask containing (-)-1 (27.7 mg, 0.0419
mmol). After gentle heating to dissolve the catalyst, the reaction mixture
was cooled in an ice bath, and acetic anhydride (0.46 mL, 4.9 mmol) was
added by syringe. After 25.5 h, the reaction was quenched with MeOH (5
mL). The mixture was passed through a short plug of silica (50% f 100%
EtOAc/hexanes, then 10% NEt3/EtOAc) to separate the alcohol and the
acetate from the catalyst. The solution of alcohol and acetate was concen-
trated, and the resulting oil was purified by flash chromatography (5% f
25% Et2O/pentane), which provided 639 mg of acetate and 517 mg of alcohol.
GC analysis of the alcohol revealed a 93% ee of the S enantiomer. A sample
of the acetate was reduced with LiAlH4 to the alcohol, which GC analysis
revealed to be the R enantiomer in 90% ee.
(4) Oriyama, T.; Hori, Y.; Imai, K.; Sasaki, R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996,
37, 8543-8546.
(5) Ruble, J . C.; Latham, H. A.; Fu, G. C. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119,
1492-1493.
(6) Kawabata, T.; Nagato, M.; Takasu, K.; Fuji, K. J . Am. Chem. Soc.
1997, 119, 3169-3170.
S0022-3263(98)00183-2 CCC: $15.00 © 1998 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 04/02/1998