J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 5341-5342
5341
Scheme 1a
Synthesis of the Antitumor Alkaloid
(+)-Pancratistatin Using the â-Azidonation Reaction
via a Prochiral 4-Arylcyclohexanone Derivative
Philip Magnus* and Iyassu K. Sebhat
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry
UniVersity of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712
ReceiVed February 4, 1998
In 1984 Pettit and co-workers reported the structure of
pancratistatin 1, which was isolated from the roots of the Hawaiian
Pancratium littorale Jacq.1 Subsequently, pancratistatin 1 has
become an important target for total synthesis because of its
increasing potential as a clinically useful antitumor agent.2 The
supply of 1 is limited, and attempts to synthesize 1 from more
abundant alkaloids such as narciclasine have not been successful.3
There are four reported total syntheses of 1. The synthesis of
the racemate was first reported by Danishefsky,4 and three
enantioselective syntheses described by Hudlicky,5 Trost,6 and
Haseltine7 rely on enzymatic and catalytic chiral palladium
methodology to introduce the correct absolute stereochemistry.
While there is substantial literature describing the synthesis of
Amaryllidaceae alkaloids in general,8 the more highly function-
alized compounds have proven tenaciously difficult to synthesize
in an efficient and practical manner.9
The â-azido triisopropylsilyl (TIPS) enol ether functionalization
reaction provides a unique strategy for the synthesis of pancrat-
istatin 1 and Amaryllidaceae alkaloids in general.10 The 4-prochiral
arylcyclohexanone 211 was treated with lithium (+)-bis(R-
methylbenzyl)amide in THF containing lithium chloride, followed
a Ar ) 3-ClC6H4.
(1) Pettit, G. R.; Gaddamidi, V.; Cragg, G. M.; Herald, D. L.; Sagawa, Y.
J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1984, 1693.
(2) Pettit, G. R.; Gaddamidi, V.; Herald, D. L.; Singh, S. B.; Cragg, G.
M.; Schmidt, J. M. J. Nat. Prod. 1986, 46, 995. Gabrielson, B.; Monath, T.
P.; Huggins, J. W.; Kirsi, J. J.; Hollingshead, M.; Shannon, W. M.; Pettit, G.
R. Natural Products as AntiViral Angents; Chu, C. K., Cutler, H. G., Ed.;
Plenum: New York, 1992; p 121.
(3) Pettit, G. R.; Melody, N.; O’Sullivan, M.; Thompson, M. A.; Herald,
D. L.; Coates, B. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1994, 2725.
(4) Danishefsky, S.; Lee, J. Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 4829.
(5) Hudlicky, T.; Tian, X.; Ko¨nigsberger, K.; Maurya, R.; Rouden, J.; Fan,
B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 10752. Polt, R. Organic Synthesis: Theory
and Applications; Hudlicky, T., Ed.; JAI Press: Greenwich, CT, 1996; Vol
3, p 109.
(6) Trost, B. M.; Pulley, S. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 10143.
(7) Doyle, T. J.; Hendrix, M.; VanDerveer, D.; Javanmard, S.; Haseltine,
J. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 11153-11170.
(8) Martin, S. F. The Alkaloids; Brossi, A., Ed.; Academic Press: New
York, 1987; Vol 30, p 251.
(9) The synthesis of 7-deoxypancratistatin has been achieved by several
groups. Tian, X.; Maurya, R.; Ko¨nigsberger, K.; Hudlicky, T. Synlett 1995,
1125. Keck, G. E.; McHardy, S. F.; Murry, J. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995,
117, 7289. Chida, N.; Iitsuoka, M.; Yamamoto, Y.; Ohtsuka, M.; Ogawa, S.
Heterocycles 1996, 43, 1385. Paulsen, H.; Stubbe, M. Liebigs Ann. Chem.
1983, 535. Ohta, S.; Kimoto, S. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1976, 24, 2977.
(10) Magnus, P.; Lacour, J.; Evans, P. A.; Roe, M. B.; Hulme, C. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 3406.
(11) Bromine-lithium exchange of the known bromide I (Shirasaka, T.;
Takuma, Y.; Imaki, N. Synth. Comm. 1990, 20, 1223), followed by addition
of II, and dehydration of the initial adduct gave III. Hydrogenation of III
and acid hydrolysis provided 2.
by TIPSOTf to give 3 in 95% yield with an ee of g85%.12
Treatment of 3 with (PhIO)n/TMSN3 in CH2Cl2 at -15 °C rapidly
produced 4 (95%) as a mixture of trans- and cis-diastereomers
in a 3.5:1 ratio, Scheme 1. Exposure of the mixture to LiBPh4
did not improve the ratio by equilibration via a putative enonium
ion but led to decomposition and elimination to dienes.10
Consequently, while the trans-/cis-ratio of 4 could not be
improved, the yield of the required trans-4 is approximately 75%.
At this stage the stereoisomers could not be separated. Reduction
of 4 using LiAlH4/Et2O, followed by treatment with ClCO2Me/
pyridine gave 5, as a mixture of trans-/cis-diastereomers. On a
large scale (>6 g) two crystallizations were sufficient to provide
pure 5 (56% from 4).
It was anticipated that epoxidation of 5 would proceed by axial
addition, and eventually, after a series of intermediate steps, form
6.13 Indeed, treatment of 5 with m-chloroperoxybenzoic acid/
CH2Cl2/imidazole gave 6 in excellent yield. Mild acid hydrolysis
of 6 gave 7, which on treatment with KOBut/HMPA at 90 °C
resulted in complete conversion into 8 (91%).
At this stage it was necessary to convert 8 into the derived
R,â-unsaturated ketone 11. This proved to be extremely difficult
(12) At the present time there is no predictive model that suggests a
particular base and ketone will result in a specific chiral enolate. Therefore,
predictions are based upon comparisons with experimental data for 4-substi-
tuted cyclohexanones and must be taken with caution. Simpkins, N. S. Pure
Appl. Chem. 1996, 68, 691-694. Cox, P. J.; Simpkins, N. S. Tetrahedron
Asymm. 1991, 2, 1-26. Bunn, B. J.; Simpkins, N. S. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58,
533-534. Yamashita, T.; Sato, D.; Kiyoto, T.; Kumar, A.; Koga, K.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 9195-9198.
(13) Magnus, P.; Mugrage, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 462. Magnus,
P.; Lacour, J.; Coldham, I.; Mugrage, B.; Bauta, B. Tetrahedron 1995, 51,
11087.
S0002-7863(98)00407-7 CCC: $15.00 © 1998 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 05/13/1998