Deprotonation of Calixarenes in Acetonitrile
TABLE 5. Determination of pKa for the First
TABLE 7. pKa Values for Calixarenes in MeCN at 25 °C
Deprotonation of Calix[6]arene 1b in MeCN at 25 °C
and Calculated Gas-Phase Acidities
base
pKa (BH+)
λ (nm)
K
pKa (H8A/H7A-)
experimental pKa
∆Ea
Gb
calixarene
values
(kJ mol-1
)
(kJ mol-1
)
15
16
mean
16.91
16.31
305
310
19 ( 4
5.98 ( 0.75
15.64 ( 0.08
15.54 ( 0.05
15.59 ( 0.06
1b pKa(1)
1c pKa(1)
1a pKa(1)
1c pKa(2)
1b pKa(2)
1a pKa(2)
all pKa(3)
phenol
15.59 ( 0.06
17.20 ( 0.20
19.06 ( 0.22
20.32 ( 0.31
23.85 ( 0.35
>33
1363
1361
1396
1561
1621
1779
>1916
1524
1337
1335
1370
1535
1595
1753
>1890
1498
TABLE 6. Determination of pKa for the Second
Deprotonation of Calix[6]arene 1b in MeCN at 25 °C
.33
26.6
base
pKa (BH+)
λ (nm)
K
pKa (H8A/H7A-)
3
4
25.49
24.34
310/315
315
71 ( 34
32 ( 10
23.6 ( 0.2
24.10 ( 0.13
23.85 ( 0.35
a Difference in total energy between acid and conjugate base,
E(Hn-1A(m+1)-) - E(HnAm-); e.g., for the H-calix[6]arene pKa(2),
mean
∆E ) E(H4A2-) - E(H5A-) in kJ mol-1 b Gas-phase acidity here
.
is defined following Chipman (Chipman, D. M. J. Phys. Chem. A
ZPE
2002, 106, 7413), such that G ) GAB + GP, where GAB ) HAB
+
Measurement of a second pKa value for calix[6]arene
also proved difficult. Titration with 1 equiv of a strong
base such as 3 gave the UV-vis spectrum of the mono-
deprotonated calixarene H5A-. Further titration with 3
yielded a product with a λmax at 310 nm. This product is
assigned as the dianion, H4A2-, with a H5A-/H4A2- pKa
well above 21.19 (where titration with 7 showed only
mono-deprotonation) and just below 25.49 (the pKa of 3).
Isosbestic points at 271 and 285 nm were slightly shifted
from those for mono-deprotonation (262 and 283 nm).
Titration with 3 and the weaker base DBU 4 (pKa )
24.34) yielded a second pKa value for calix[6]arene, i.e.,
for H5A-/H4A2- (Table 6).
Titration with Verkade’s superbase 2 appeared to give
a curved increase in absorbance in the H5A-/H4A2- region
above 300 nm before leveling off after 1.5-2.0 equiv, and
then a further sharper increase after this. However, the
final spectrum, even after 4.5 equiv, was the same as that
corresponding to the dianion obtained using 3 and 4. It
is not clear to us why this base (alone) shows this
behavior, although given its pKa (33.53) there may be
some complication caused by deprotonation of the solvent.
Computational Studies. The calixarenes and their
anions were modeled using the B3LYP DFT method,
which is preferred to HF because of the significant
difference in electron distribution between the acid and
anionic forms. Given the sizes of the molecules, the tetra-
t-Bu-depleted H-calixarenes were used, as well as the
economical 6-31G* basis set. All calculated structures are
shown in the Supporting Information.
GAB + EABelec, with the three AB terms being the zero-point
nuclear vibrational energy, the thermal correction term, and the
internal electronic energy (∆E in Table 7), respectively, and GP is
the free energy of the proton at -6.3 kcal/mol (-26.3 kJ/mol)
(Hirschfelder, J. O.; Curtiss, C. F.; Bird, R. B. Molecular Theory
of Gases and Liquids; Wiley: New York, 1964). Chipman quotes
0T
ZPE
0T
the combined HAB
+ GAB as GABnuc, and it’s equal to -7
to -9 kcal/mol for a range of acids (H2O, MeOH, PhOH (-8.1
kcal/mol, -34 kJ/mol), HCO2H, MeCO2H, and PhCO2H) calculated
by HF/6-31+G* and B3LYP/6-31+G* models; the value for phenol
was used here.
1,2-alternate, or 1,3-alternate. However, it seems sensible
to assume a cone conformation, which maximizes internal
hydrogen bonding in a solvent such as MeCN, whose
ability to solvate anions is poor. The B3LYP/6-31G*
energy difference between H3A- and H4A is given as ∆E
in Table 7. The B3LYP/6-31G*-optimized cone-derived
dianion gave a much larger ∆E for H3A-/H2A2-, with that
for a 1,2-alternate dianion larger still.
For H-calix[6]arene, experimental evidence indicates
that three conformers are most common: the “pinched”
cone, the “winged” cone, and the 1,2,3-alternate.1f,3
Modeling at both MM39 and B3LYP/6-31G* levels for
H-calix[6]arene gave the pinched cone as the lowest-
energy structure, and results were similar for the monoan-
ion. Only one H-calix[6]arene dianion was chosen, which
derived from the winged-winged cone conformer, in
which the greatest cross-cone O-O separation is possible.
A calix[6]arene trianion was also based on the winged-
winged conformation, and was found to be at high energy.
Extensive conformational searching was not feasible
for H-calix[8]arene and its monoanion, so calculations
were made solely on the basis of the pleated loop
conformation.40 There is some experimental evidence that
a dianion might prefer the 1,2,3,4-alternate cone confor-
mation,41 and this is supported by MM calculations; so
this dianion was optimized at B3LYP/6-31G*. As for the
calix[6]arene, a trianion (based on a twisted loop) is much
higher in energy.
The B3LYP/6-31G* geometry-optimized structure for
H-calix[4]arene in the preferred cone conformation35,36
gives geometric parameters that compare favorably to
those found using an earlier model35 and to experimental
data.37 For the monoanion, semiempirical calculations by
Grootenhuis et al.38 indicated little difference in energies
in water for the various conformers, cone, partial cone,
(35) Bernadino, R. J.; Costa Cabral, B. J. J. Phys. Chem. A 1999,
103, 9080.
Discussion
(36) (a) Fischer, S.; Grootenhuis, P. D.; Groenen, L. C.; van Hoornm,
W. P.; van Veggel, F. C. J. M.; Reinhoudt, D. N.; Karplus, M. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 1611. (b) Harada, T.; Rudzinski, J. M.; Osawa,
E.; Shinkai, S. Tetrahedron 1993, 49, 5941. (c) Harada, T.; Oseto, F.;
Shinkai, S. Tetrahedron 1994, 50, 13377. (d) Harada, T.; Shinkai, S.
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1995, 2231. (e) Gutsche, C. D.; Bauer,
L. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 6052.
The measured pKa values for the three calixarenes are
gathered in Table 7. The increased aqueous acidity, by
(39) Calculations at the MM level have also been carried out by:
Shinkai, S. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1995, 2231.
(40) Gutsche, C. D. In Calixarenes, Monographs in Supramolecular
Chemistry; Stoddart, J. F., Ed.; The Royal Society of Chemistry:
Cambridge, U.K., 1989; p 46.
(41) Clague, N. P.; Crane, J. D.; Sinn, E.; Young, N. A.; Clegg, W.;
Coles, S. J.; Teat, S. J.; Moreton, D. J. Chem. Commun. 1999, 379.
(37) Ungaro, R.; Pochini, A.; Andreetti, G. D.; Sangermano, V. J.
Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1984, 1979.
(38) Grootenhuis, P. D. J.; Kollman, P. A.; Groenen, L. C.; Reinhoudt,
D. N.; van Hummel, G. J.; Ugozzoli, F.; Andreetti, G. D. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1990, 112, 4165.
J. Org. Chem, Vol. 70, No. 23, 2005 9253