COMMUNICATIONS
solvent in vacuo gave the desired enediyne (1.67 g, 93%) as a brown oil,
which was used directly in the next step. 2) To the enediyne (1.67 g,
4.13 mmol) in MeOTMS (2.0 mL, 1.5 g, 15 mmol) was added TMSOTf
(0.10 mL, 0.12 g, 0.52 mmol). After the reaction mixture had been stirred
for 48 h at 258C, aqueous workup (NaHCO3), removal of the solvent in
vacuo, and filtration through silica gel (Et2O/hexanes 1/1) gave the desired
bis(acetal) (1.38 g, 74%) as a yellow oil. 3) To the bis(acetal) (7.34 g,
16.3 mmol) in MeOH (50 mL) was added K2CO3 ( ꢁ 100 mg). After the
reaction mixture had been stirred for 15 min at 258C, aqueous workup,
removal of the solvent in vacuo, and filtration through silica gel (Et2O/
hexanes 1/1) gave 6b (5.80 g, 94%) as a yellow oil. It was diluted with THF
(100 mL) and used directly in the next step.
[6] Y. Rubin, S. S. Lin, C. B. Knobler, J. Anthony, A. M. Boldi, F.
Diederich, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 6943 ± 6949.
[7] Y. Rubin, C. B. Knobler, F. Diederich, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112,
1607 ± 1617.
[8] The conformationally locked lone pairs on both O atoms of the
cyclopentadienone ethylene acetal create a similar situation. This is
manifested by the dimerization rate, which is 500000 times faster over
that of cyclopentadiene and 1070 times faster than that of the
dimethoxyacetal: P. E. Eaton, R. A. Hudson, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1965,
57, 2769 ± 2771. We are indebted to Professor Philip Eaton at the
University of Chicago for his insightful suggestion.
[9] a) L. S. Liebeskind, K. R. Wirtz, J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 5350 ± 5358;
b) L. S. Liebeskind, R. W. Fengl, K. R. Wirtz, T. T. Shawe, ibid. 1988,
53, 2482 ± 2488.
[10] a) C. Yeretzian, K. Hansen, F. Diederich, R. L. Whetten, Nature 1992,
359, 44 ± 47; b) R. D. Beck, P. Weis, G. Bräuchle, M. M. Kappes, J.
Chem. Phys. 1994, 100, 262 ± 270; c) Z. X. Xie, Z. Y. Liu, C. R. Wang,
R. B. Huang, F. C. Lin, L. S. Zheng, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 1995,
91, 987 ± 990.
[11] a) Q. L. Zhang, S. C. OꢁBrien, J. R. Heath, Y. Liu, R. F. Curl, H. Kroto,
R. E. Smalley, J. Phys. Chem. 1986, 90, 525 ± 528; b) P. Wurz, K. R.
Lykke, ibid. 1992, 96, 10129 ± 10139; c) G. Ulmer, E. E. B. Campbell,
R. Kühnle, H. G. Busmann, I. V. Hertel, Chem. Phys. Lett. 1991, 182,
114 ± 119.
7b: To 6b (6.28 g, 16.6 mmol) in THF (100 mL) at 788C was added
LiHMDS, which was prepared from (Me3Si)2NH (3.50 mL, 2.68 g,
16.6 mmol) and 2.5m nBuLi (6.60 mL, 16.6 mmol) in THF (15 mL). After
30 min CuBr (2.38 g, 16.6 mmol) was added, and the mixture warmed to
08C. To this solution was added 1,3,5-tris(bromoethynyl)benzene[1a] (2.03 g,
5.25 mmol). After the reaction mixture had been stirred for 12 h at 258C,
aqueous workup (NaHCO3) and removal of the solvent in vacuo gave a
brown oil, which was purified by chromatography on silica gel (hexanes to
hexanes/Et2O 3/1) to afford 7b (3.25 g, 48%) as a colorless foam.
8b: To 7b (500 mg, 0.391 mmol) in THF (10 mL) was added five drops of
H2O followed by 1.0m TBAF (2.0 mL, 2.0 mmol). The reaction mixture was
stirred for 2 h, diluted with hexanes (50 mL), and filtered through silica gel
(Et2O). The resulting yellow fractions were concentrated to 5 mL and
diluted with ODCB (400 mL) for the immediately following cyclization.
[12] A possible mechanism for the rearrangement of C60H6 (1) to C60 is
available from the authors upon request.
9b: To the solution of 8b obtained above was added CuCl (119 mg,
1.20 mmol) followed by TMEDA (1.0 mL, 0.77 g, 6.6 mmol). After the
reaction mixture had been stirred for 1 h under air, the solution was poured
on top of a pad of silica gel and eluted with CHCl3 to remove most of the
ODCB. Elution with Et2O/CHCl3 (1/2) provided a yellow fraction with the
desired product. The solvent was removed, and the brown oil purified by
chromatography on silica gel (Et2O/CHCl3 5/95). Removal of the solvent in
vacuo gave cyclophane 9b (150 mg, 48%) as a yellow foam.
A Dendritic Macrocyclic Organic Polyradical
with a Very High Spin of S 10**
Andrzej Rajca,* Jirawat Wongsriratanakul,
Suchada Rajca, and Ronald Cerny
3: Aliquots of 9b (5 - 30 mg) were dissolved in trifluoroacetic acid (1 ±
3 mL). Over 3 ± 6 h a precipitate began to form (the reaction could be
monitored by 1H NMR spectroscopy in CF3CO2D). After 6 ± 12 h the
trifluoroacetic acid was removed in vacuo at 258C in the absence of light.
[D8]THF ( ꢁ 0.5 mL) was immediately added to the remaining orange-red
solid under argon. This solution was used for 13C NMR spectroscopy. For
the LD-MS experiments, anhydrous CH2Cl2 or THF were added to dissolve
the precipitate, and the solution was used immediately.
Organic molecules with a very high spin possess a large
number of ferromagnetically coupled unpaired electrons.[1]
The design and synthesis of such molecules must overcome
the challenging problem of maintaining strong through-bond
interactions between multiple sites within the molecule.[1d, 2]
Highly efficient generation of unpaired electrons and/or
multiple pathways for ferromagnetic coupling provided
organic molecules with S greater than 5.[3±6] The highest spin
for an organic molecule to date, a nonacarbene with S 9, was
reported by Iwamura and co-workers in 1993.[3]
Received: March 4, 1998 [Z11555IE]
German version: Angew. Chem. 1998, 110, 1353 ± 1356
Keywords: alkynes ´ cage compounds ´ carbon allotropes ´
fullerenes ´ mass spectrometry
Polyradical 1 was designed as an ªorganic spin clusterº.[6, 7]
Because ferromagnetic coupling through 1,3-phenylene is
significantly stronger than that through a 3,4'-biphenylene
unit, unpaired electrons in the four dendritic branches and the
macrocyclic core can effectively be lumped into component
spins (S').[6] Such a ferromagnetically coupled spin pentamer
with S' 5/2, 5/2, 5/2, 5/2, 2 should have a ground state with
S 12 (Scheme 1). We describe here the synthesis and
magnetic studies of polyradical 1.
[1] a) Y. Rubin, T. C. Parker, S. I. Khan, C. L. Holliman, S. W. McElvany,
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 5308 ± 5309; b) Y. Rubin, Chem. Eur. J.
1997, 3, 1009 ± 1016.
[2] a) Y. Rubin, M. Kahr, C. B. Knobler, F. Diederich, C. L. Wilkins, J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 495 ± 500; b) S. W. McElvany, M. M. Ross,
N. S. Goroff, F. Diederich, Science 1993, 259, 1594 ± 1596; c) F.
Diederich, Y. Rubin, O. L. Chapman, N. S. Goroff, Helv. Chim. Acta
1994, 77, 1441 ± 1457; d) N. S. Goroff, Acc. Chem. Res. 1996, 29, 77 ± 83.
[3] a) G. von Helden, M. T. Hsu, N. Gotts, M. T. Bowers, J. Phys. Chem.
1993, 97, 8182 ± 8192; b) J. M. Hunter, J. L. Fye, M. F. Jarrold, Science
1993, 260, 784 ± 786; c) J. M. Hunter, J. L. Fye, E. J. Roskamp, M. F.
Jarrold, J. Phys. Chem. 1994, 98, 1810 ± 1818; d) K. B. Shelimov, D. E.
Clemmer, M. F. Jarrold, J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 1996, 567 ± 574;
e) D. L. Strout, G. E. Scuseria, J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 6492 ± 6498.
[4] a) F. T. Edelmann, Angew. Chem. 1995, 107, 1071 ± 1075; Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34, 981 ± 985; b) S. Nagase, K. Kobayashi, T.
Akasaka, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1996, 69, 2131 ± 2142.
[*] Prof. A. Rajca, Mr. J. Wongsriratanakul, Dr. S. Rajca, Prof. R. Cerny
Department of Chemistry
University of Nebraska
Lincoln, NE 68588 (USA)
Fax: (1)402-472-9402
[**] This research was supported by the National Science Foundation
(CHE-9510096). We thank Dr. Richard Schoemaker for the NMR
spectral determinations and Ms. Nissakorn Thongkon for her
assistance with synthesis.
[5] For a similar approach to C60H6, see Y. Tobe, N. Nakagawa, K.
Naemura, T. Wakabayashi, T. Shida, Y. Achiba, J. Am. Chem. Soc., im
Druck.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1998, 37, No. 9
ꢀ WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH, D-69451 Weinheim, 1998
1433-7851/98/3709-1229 $ 17.50+.50/0
1229