Intramural Cardiac Myxoma
Rendón
familial myxomas constitute 7% of cardiac myxomas and Cardiac myxomas continue to generate interest because
exhibit atypical biological behavior including multicen- of their uncertain histogenesis. The intramural cardiac
myxoma in the left ventricle wall in our patient supports
the hypothesis that the stromal cells of cardiac myxoma
derive from multipotential mesenchymal cells.8 This case
also serves to remind that in a young patient with
alterations in the ST segment and no cardiac risk factors,
one must rule out a cardiac tumor.
tricity (45%), atypical location (in cardiac chambers other
than the left atrium, 38%), recurrence after surgical
excision (12% to 22%), and unusual associated conditions
(20%) such as the Carney complex.4 Patients with a
familial predisposition to cardiac myxoma are usually
younger (mean age, 28 years) and they have less female
predominance. How fast cardiac myxomas grow has never
been clarified, but it appears they might grow rather
rapidly (average rate of 0.15 cm per month).5
REFERENCES
1. Reynen K. Cardiac myxomas. N Engl J Med 1995;
333:1610–7.
2. BurkeA, Virmani R. Tumors of the heart and great vessels.
In: Atlas of tumor pathology. 3rd series, fasc 16.
Washington, DC: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology,
1996:21–46.
The clinical features of myxomas are determined by their
location, size, and mobility. Most patients present with
one or more of the triad of embolism, intracardiac
obstruction, and constitutional symptoms; occasionally,
there are no symptoms.6 Electrocardiographic findings
are nonspecific and may reflect hemodynamic or electrical
alterations. Chest radiographs may reveal an alteration of
the cardiac contour, enlargement of any of the cardiac
chambers, and signs of pulmonary hypertension and
congestion. Angiocardiography, once the standard for
cardiac tumor diagnosis, has now waned in importance,
but coronary arteriography may suggest the diagnosis of
cardiac myxoma by showing the typical contrast
opacification of an arterial branch ending in a tumor
“blush”.7 Transthoracic and transesophageal echocardi-
ography can detect the presence of the mass but rarely
define its true nature, especially when it is located in the
ventricular wall. In such cases, a diagnosis of tumor is
usually presumed and the patient is sent for surgery.
Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging can be useful in
determining the nature of an intracardiac mass, especially
when its anatomic location is unusual, as in our patient.
3. Lie JT. The identity and histogenesis of cardiac myxomas.
A controversy put to rest. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1989;113:
724–6.
4. McCarthy PM, Piehler JM, Schaff HV, Pluth JR, Orszulak
TA, Vidaillet HJ Jr, et al. The significance of multiple,
recurrent, and “complex” cardiac myxomas. J Thorac
Cardiovasc Surg 1986;91:389–96.
5. Malekzadeh S, Robert WC. Growth rate of left atrial
myxoma. Am J Cardiol 1989;64:1075–6.
6. Pucci A, Gagliardotto P, Zanini C, Pansini S, di Summa
M, Mollo F. Histopathologic and clinical characterization
of cardiac myxoma: review of 53 cases from a single
institution. Am Heart J 2000;140:134–8.
7. Singh RN, Burkholder JA, Magovern GJ. Coronary
arteriography as an aid in left atrial myxoma diagnosis.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1984;7:40–3.
8. Krikler DM, Rode J, Davies MJ, Woolf N, Moss E. Atrial
myxoma: a tumour in search of its origins. Br Heart J
1992;67:89–91.
A
SIAN
C
ARDIOVASCULAR & THORACIC
A
NNALS
172
2002, VOL. 10, NO. 2