Heterogeneous Agꢀcontaining catalysts
Russ.Chem.Bull., Int.Ed., Vol. 64, No. 12, December, 2015 2797
For surface modification with amino groups, mesoporous
silicate МСМꢀ41 was preꢀtreated for 3 h in a dry air flow at 550 °С
(SBET = 896 m2 g–1) and then refluxed for 24 h in toluene with
APTES excess in an argon atmosphere. The support was filtered,
washed with toluene and diethyl ether from APTES residues,
and dried in vacuo. The modified support was designated as
APTES—MCMꢀ41.
The characteristics of the used supports and conditions of
their precalcination are presented in Table 1.
The heterogeneous catalysts were prepared by the incipient
wetness impregnation method.
To reduce the samples with supported silver nitrate, they
were treated in flowing hydrogen. The temperature was increased
from room temperature to 450 °С with a heating rate of 4 °С min.
The samples were then cooled to ~20 °C and purged with Ar for
15 min. The Ag(1%)/APTES—MCMꢀ41 sample was reduced by
the treatment with an aqueous solution of sodium borohydride
(1.2 moles of NaBH4 (mole of Ag)–1). After reduction, the cataꢀ
lysts were washed with water to remove sodium borohydride
excess and dried in air for 24 h.
4ꢀHydroxyꢀ3ꢀphenylquinolinꢀ2(1Н)ꢀone (3). The reaction
was carried out in a temperatureꢀcontrolled reactor with a jacket,
and СО2 was introduced into the reactor through a needle inꢀ
serted into a bottom sampler. The reactor was loaded with comꢀ
pound 1 (0.3 mmol), Ag (0.03 mmol), DBU (0.3 mmol), and
DMSO (2 mL). The mixture was stirred for 24 h at 60 °С. To
isolate the product, the reaction mixture was filtered and exꢀ
tracted with 1 М NaOH (3×4 mL). The aqueous layer was acidiꢀ
fied with a solution of 2 М HCl to the neutral pH and extracted
with EtOAc (5×15 mL). The organic layer was collected, washed
with a solution of 2 М HCl (2×80 mL), dried over Na2SO4, and
filtered. The solvent was removed on a rotary evaporator (T = 35 °С,
P = 60 mbar) to obtain 4ꢀhydroxyquinolinꢀ2(1Н)ꢀone 2 as dry
white crystals. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3), δ: 4.37 (s, 2 H);
6.78 (dd, 2 H, J1 = 7.5 Hz, J2 = 5.5 Hz); 7.19 (t, 1 H, J = 8.4 Hz);
7.45—7.62 (m, 4 H); 7.76 (d, 1 H, J = 6.5 Hz); 7.86 (t, 2 H,
J = 9.4 Hz); 8.44 (d, 1 H, J = 8.3 Hz). 13С NMR (100 MHz,
DMSOꢀd6), δ: 114 (C(1)); 115.32 (C(2)); 116.13 (C(3)); 121.51
(C(4)); 123.54 (C(5)); 127.26 (C(6)); 128.08 (C(7), C(8)); 130.94
(C(9)); 131.61 (C(10), C(11)); 134.54 (C(12)); 138.47 (C(13));
157.71 (C(14)); 163.10 (C(15)).
Cesium carbonate Cs2CO3 was synthesized by the reaction
of cesium hydroxide with ammonium carbonate.
The structures of the obtained products were confirmed by
1H and 13С spectroscopy.
(Z)ꢀ4ꢀBenzylideneꢀ1,4ꢀhydroxoꢀ2Нꢀ3,1ꢀbenzoxazinꢀ2ꢀone
(2). The catalyst (0.0125 mmole of Ag), DABCO (0.2 equiv.),
compound 1 (0.125 mmol), and anhydrous DMSO (1 mL) were
consequently introduced into a preꢀdried autoclave equipped
with a stirrer. The autoclave was closed and purged with СО2
three times, after which CO2 was fed and an operating pressure
was established. The reaction mixture was stirred for 24 h at
~20 °C and P(СО2) = 10 atm. After the reaction, the autoclave
was cooled in an iceꢀcold bath and the СО2 pressure was slowly
released. Benzoxazinꢀ2ꢀone 2 was isolated from the reacꢀ
tion solution using column liquid chromatography on silica gel
L5/40μ. An nꢀhexane—ethyl acetate (2 : 1) mixture served as an
eluent. TLC was used for express analysis of the reaction mixture
and fractions collected from the column. The fractions containꢀ
ing the product were combined, and the solvent was pumped out
under reduced pressure to obtain benzoxazinꢀ2ꢀone 2 as dry
white crystals. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3), δ: 6.26 (s, 1 H);
6.88 (d, 1 H, J = 8.1 Hz); 7.11 (t, 1 H, J = 7.6 Hz); 7.28—7.41
(m, 4 H); 7.59 (d, 1 H, J = 7.9 Hz); 7.80 (d, 2 H, J = 7.6 Hz);
8.72 (s, 1 H). 13С NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3), δ: 105.82 (С(1));
114.90 (С(2)); 116.05 (С(3)); 122.98 (С(4)); 124.21 (С(5));
127.29 (С(6)); 128.54 (С(7), С(8)); 129.25 (С(9), С(10));
130.36 (С(11)); 133.67 (С(12)); 134.03 (С(13)); 144.91 (С(14));
148.57 (С(15)).
1H and 13С NMR spectra were measured on a Bruker AM300
spectrometer (solvents CDCl3 and DMSOꢀd6), and the data of
HSQC, HMBC, APT, and NOESY procedures were used for
signal assignment.
Diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectra
(DRIFTS) were recorded at ~20 °C on a Nicolet 460 Protégé
spectrometer with the diffuse reflectance attachment. Catalyst
samples were placed in ampules with a KBr window, and a CaF2
powder served as a reference sample. For a satisfactory signal to
noise ratio, 500 spectra were accumulated. IR spectra were meaꢀ
sured in a wide frequency range of 400—6000 cm–1 with a resoluꢀ
tion of 4 cm–1. Carbon monoxide served as a probe molecule and
was adsorbed at ~20 °C and an equilibrium pressure of 15 Torr.
The phase composition of catalyst samples was determined
by Xꢀray diffraction analysis. The XRD patterns were collected on
a Dronꢀ3 instrument using CuꢀKα radiation (λ = 0.1542 nm).
The samples were scanned in the 2θ range of 5—60° at 1° min of scan
speed. The size of coherent scattering region (DCSR, Å) was
determined taking the peak width at half heights for the signal at
38.1 Å corresponding to the metallic silver phase. The diffractograms
were compared with the JCPDSꢀICDD and ICDS references.
Table 1. Characteristics of the supports and conditions of
their preliminary thermal treatment
b
Support
Ta/°C
τ /h
SBET/m2 g–1
γꢀAl2O3
SiO2 KCC No. 3
TiO2
Al2O3(F)
МСМꢀ41
W—ZrO2
600
260
550
550
550
650
2
8
2
2
3
2
140—160
450
15
120
896
120
Results and Discussion
According to the literature data,8—10 the catalytic transꢀ
formations of 2ꢀ(2ꢀphenylethynyl)aniline under the acꢀ
a Temperature of thermal treatment.
b Duration of thermal treatment.