J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 9973-9974
Redox Cycling of Segmented Copper Helicates
9973
Abdelkrim El-ghayouy,1 Anthony Harriman,1 Andre´ De Cian,2
Jean Fischer,2 and Raymond Ziessel1*
Ecole Europe´enne de Chimie, Polyme´res, Mate´riaux
1 rue Blaise Pascal, 67008 Strasbourg Cedex, France
ReceiVed April 16, 1998
In the past decade many wondrous examples of metallohelicates
have been described.3 Although these architectures are fascinating
to behold, few applications have been found for metallohelicates
or related structures and most attention has focused on their
relevance to supramolecular chemistry.4 In particular, because
dissociation of the helicate competes with reversible redox
cycling,5 useful catalytic functions have not been identified despite
the close proximity of redox-active metal centers.4 With copper-
(I) helicates, for example, oxidative dissociation is promoted by
the need to change the geometry around the metal center from
tetrahedral6 to a 5- or 6-coordinate ligand field.7 Even the
binuclear mixed-valence copper helicate formed from quinquepyr-
idine,8 which shows reversible one-electron oxidation and reduc-
tion steps in cyclic voltammetry, changes nuclearity on reduction
to the copper(I) species. We now introduce a simple strategy,
based on a multitopic ligand able to satisfy the coordination
demands of both copper(I) and copper(II) cations, that allows self-
assembly of binuclear copper helicates displaying exceptional
redox stability. It might be anticipated that such systems will
display useful catalytic functions.9
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the changes in coordination and/
or structure at each stage of oxidation of the binuclear copper helicate.
[Cu2L2](BF4)2, 12+, was prepared in 96% yield by treating the
free ligand L (Figure 1) in CH2Cl2 with copper(I) tetrafluoroborate
in acetonitrile at 20 °C. The X-ray crystal structure shows that
the two copper(I) cations are separated by 3.278 Å and that the
complex is a helicate (Figure 2A). Each metal center, having
pseudotetrahedral geometry, is coordinated to N atoms provided
by a single imino (IN) function and three pyridine (PN) residues,
with the two cations being equivalent. The free IN atom that
resides 2.629 Å from the copper(I) cation is unlikely to be
coordinated to the metal even if the cis conformation is indicative
of some electronic interaction.10 In solution, however, 15N-HMBC
NMR spectroscopy resolves only three distinct N atoms. This
suggests that the two bound ligands glide across the metal centers,
causing their equivalence on the NMR time scale, so that the
complex persists in a state of dynamic fluctuation in solution
(Figure 1). A similar conclusion is reached from FT-IR and both
1H and 13C NMR spectra recorded in solution where only a single
imino group can be resolved.
Figure 2. (A) ORTEP view of the X-ray crystal structure of the binuclear
copper(I) complex 12+ showing the helical arrangement of the ligands L
with the uncoordinated imino functions residing in the cis conformation.
(B) ORTEP view of the crystal structure of the mixed-valence species
13+ showing coordinative asymmetry in the solid state.
Cyclic voltammetry studies made in acetonitrile show, in
addition to several quasi-reversible reduction processes associated
with the ligands (E1/2 ) -1.18 ( 0.02 V, ∆Ep ) 69 mV; E1/2
)
-1.42 ( 0.02 V vs SCE, ∆Ep ) 103 mV), two successive, quasi-
reversible oxidation steps. Controlled potential coulommetry
showed each oxidation step corresponds to removal of a single
electron. Consequently, the first process (E1/2 ) 0.15 ( 0.01 V
vs SCE, ∆Ep ) 78 mV) forms the mixed-valence species 13+
while the second step (E1/2 ) 0.87 ( 0.02 V vs SCE, ∆Ep ) 84
mV) generates the binuclear copper(II) complex 14+
. The
(1) Current address: Laboratoire de Chimie, d’Electronique et Photonique
Mole´culaires, Ecole Europe´enne de Chimie, Polyme`res et Mate´riaux (ECPM).
(2) Current address: Laboratoire de Cristallochimie et de Chimie Struc-
turale, Institut Le Bel.
difference in potential between removal of the first and second
electrons (∆E1/2 ) 720 mV) is due, in part, to the Coulombic
effect associated with the increased charge since the metal centers
must remain in close proximity. That the two metal centers are
electronically coupled is apparent from the appearance of a
Gaussian-shaped, intervalence charge-transfer (IVCT) absorption
(3) Lehn, J.-M. Supramolecular Chemistry; VCH Publishers: Weinheim,
1995.
(4) Piguet, C.; Bernardinelli, G.; Hopfgartner, G. Chem. ReV. 1997, 97,
2005.
(5) Gisselbrecht, J.-P.; Gross, M.; Lehn, J.-M.; Sauvage, J.-P.; Ziessel, R.;
Piccinni-Leopardt, C.; Arrieta, J. M.; Germain, G.; Van Meersche, M. NouV.
J. Chim. 1984, 8, 661.
band centered at 1400 nm (ꢀmax ≈ 37 ( 5 M-1 cm-1; ∆ν1/2
≈
1950 ( 100 cm-1). Spectroelectrochemistry made at fixed
potentials of 0.50 and 1.10 V vs Ag°, respectively, showed no
detectable loss of either 13+ or 14+ over 5 min standing while the
IVCT absorption band of 13+ was stable over many days. This
stability is in marked contrast to most other metallohelicates which
undergo substantial structural rearrangement during redox cy-
cling.4,5,8,11
(6) (a) Burke, P. J.; McMillan, D. R.; Robinson, W. R. Inorg. Chem. 1980,
19, 1211. (b) Healy, P. C.; Engelhardt, L. M.; Patrick, V. A.; White A. H. J.
Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1985, 2541.
(7) (a) Albrecht-Gary, A.-M.; Dietrich-Buchecker, C. O.; Saad, Z.; Sauvage,
J.-P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 1467. (b) Collin, J.-P.; Gasvind, P.;
Sauvage, J.-P. Chem. Commun. 1996, 2005.
(8) Potts, K. T.; Kashavarz, K. M.; Than, F. S.; Abruna, H. D.; Arana, C.
Inorg. Chem. 1993, 32, 4442, 4450.
(9) Kaim, W.; Rall, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 43.
(10) All X-ray structural data reported for structurally relevant imines show
a trans conformation while MO calculations made at the PM3 level indicate
that a trans configuration is the more stable structure for L.
(11) A further example of a redox stable copper helicate has been
reported: Ho, P. K. K.; Peng, S. M.; Wong, K. Y.; Che, C. M. J. Chem. Soc.,
Dalton Trans. 1996, 1829.
S0002-7863(98)01284-0 CCC: $15.00 © 1998 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 09/12/1998