performed in CHCl . 1H NMR spectra were recorded using a
Varian Gemini-300 FT NMR spectrometer and are referenced
170 mg, 0.34 mmol) in anhydrous DME was slowly added 1.2
equiv. of NaH (15 mg, 0.42 mmol) at 0 °C. After stirring for
0.5 h at 0 °C, the reaction mixture was slowly warmed up to
room temp. After stirring for 2 h at room temp., the solution
was quenched with water. The crude product was either
collected by suction filtration or extracted twice with CH Cl ,
3
to the residual CHCl (7.24 ppm). Infrared spectra were
recorded using a Perkin-Elmer System 2000 FT-IR spec-
3
trometer. Electronic absorption (UV–VIS) spectra were
recorded using a Shimadzu UV-3101PC Spectrophotometer.
Thermal properties were determined by differential scanning
calorimetry (DSC) using a Shimadzu Thermal Analysis System
TA-50ASI with a heating rate of 10 °C min−1. The reported
temperatures were the peak temperature of the traces obtained
from the rerun. Molecular weight of the co-polymer was
estimated by gel permeation chromatography (GPC) using a
Spectra Physics HPLC instrument equipped with a Jordi
Mixed-Bed GPC column. THF was used as the eluent with
toluene as an internal standard. The polystyrene standards
were used for the calibration.
2
2
dried over anhydrous MgSO and evaporated to dryness. The
crude product was then purified by silica gel chromatography
using the gradient elution technique with CH Cl –ethyl acetate
4
2
2
as eluent [affording 110 g (54%) of 13]. For the double
Wadsworth–Emmons reactions, a 251 mixture of aldehyde (i.e.
9: 350 mg, 1.37 mmol) and phosphonate ester (i.e. 3: 260 mg,
0.69 mmol) was used [affording 170 mg (43%) of 11].
1,4-Bis{4-[2-(2-butoxyethoxy)ethoxy]styryl}benzene 10. 1H
NMR (300 MHz, CDCl ) d 7.44 (s, 4H), 7.42 (d, J 8.91 Hz,
4H), 7.05 (d, J 16.20 Hz, 2H), 6.94 (d, J 16.30 Hz, 2H), 6.89 (d,
3
Z-Scan measurements were performed with
a
system
consisting of a Coherent Mira Ar-pumped Ti-sapphire laser
generating a mode-locked train of approximately 100 fs 800 nm
pulses and a Ti-sapphire regenerative amplifier pumped by a
Q-switched pulsed YAG laser at 30 Hz. The open- and closed-
aperture Z-scans were recorded at two or three concentrations
for each compound, and the real and imaginary part of the
nonlinear phase shift was determined by numerical fitting. The
real and imaginary parts of the hyperpolarizability of the
solute were calculated by assuming a linear concentration
dependence of the solution susceptibility. The nonlinearities
and light intensities were calibrated using measurements of a
1 mm thick silica plate for which the nonlinear refractive index
J 8.79 Hz, 4H), 4.15 (t, J 4.88 Hz, 4H), 3.86 (t, J 4.88 Hz, 4H),
3.71 (m, 4H), 3.60 (m, 4H), 3.46 (t, J 6.72 Hz, 4H), 1.55 (m,
4H), 1.35 (m, 4H), 0.90 (t, J 7.28 Hz, 6H). MS (EI) m/z 602.3
(M+). HRMS (EI) C H O : calc. 602.3607 found, 602.3628.
38 50
6
n
(CH Cl )/cm−1 3029, 2934, 2875, 1605, 1516, 1457, 1250,
max
2 2
1176, 1111, 1065. Crystal–mesophase=46 °C, mesophase–
isotropic=225 °C. Found: C, 75.60; H, 8.59. C H O requires
C, 75.72; H, 8.34%.
38 50
6
1,4-Bis[4-(hexylsulfonyl)styryl]benzene 11. 1H NMR
(300 MHz, CDCl ) d 7.87 (d, J 8.46 Hz, 4H), 7.66 (d, J 8.52 Hz,
3
4H), 7.55 (s, 4H), 7.25 (d, J 16.32 Hz, 2H), 7.15 (d, J 16.26 Hz,
2H), 3.08 (t, J 8.1 Hz, 4H), 1.70 (m, 4H), 1.34 (m, 4H), 1.24
(m, 8H), 0.84 (t, J 6.84 Hz, 6H). MS (EI) m/z 578.2 (M+).
n =3×10−16 cm2 W−1 was assumed.
General procedure for the aromatic nucleophic substitution
2
HRMS (EI) C H O S : calc. 578.2525, found 578.2523.
(CH Cl )/cm−1 3018, 2930, 2859, 1592, 1511, 1466,
34 42 4 2
n
To an equimolar solution of 4-fluorobenzaldehyde 6 (2 ml,
18.6 mmol) and the corresponding solubilizing substituent (e.g.
4: 2.6 ml, 18.6 mmol) in DMSO was added 2 equiv. of Na CO
max
2 2
1310, 1142, 1089. Crystal–mesophase=231 °C, mesophase–
isotropic=259 °C. Found: C, 70.47; H, 7.17; S, 10.94.
C H O S requires C, 70.55; H, 7.31; S, 11.08%.
2
3
(i.e. 5.2 g, 37.3 mmol). The mixture was heated at 150 °C for
24 h under N . After cooling to room temp., the reaction
34 42 4 2
2
Diethyl 4-{4-[2-(2-butoxyethoxy)ethoxy]styryl}benzylphos-
phonate 12. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl ) d 7.40 (d, J 8.79 Hz,
4H), 7.24 (dd, J 8.19 Hz, J 2.40 Hz, 2H), 7.01 (d, J 16.47 Hz,
mixture was poured into water and extracted twice with
CH Cl , dried over anhydrous MgSO and evaporated to
3
2
2
4
dryness. The crude product was then purified by silica gel
chromatography using the gradient elution technique with
CH Cl –ethyl acetate as eluent [affording 3.79 g (91%) of 7].
2H), 6.89 (d, J 16.41 Hz, 1H), 6.88 (d, J 8.70 Hz, 2H), 4.12 (t,
J 5.22 Hz, 2H), 3.99 (m, 4H), 3.84 (t, J 4.98 Hz, 2H), 3.70 (m,
2H), 3.58 (m, 4H), 3.58 (m, 2H), 3.44 (t, J 6.72 Hz, 2H), 3.12
(d, J 21.69 Hz, 1H), 1.55 (m, 2H), 1.32 (m, 2H), 1.22 (t, J
6.99 Hz, 6H), 0.89 (t, J 7.41 Hz, 3H).
2
2
4-Hexylsulfanylbenzaldehyde 7. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl )
d 9.89 (s, 1H), 7.73 (d, J 8.55 Hz, 2H), 7.31 (d, J 8.31 Hz, 2H),
3
2.97 (t, J 7.37 Hz, 2H), 1.68 (m, 2H), 1.29 (m, 2H), 1.28 (m,
4H), 0.86 (t, J 7.11 Hz, 3H).
1-{4-[2-(2-Butoxyethoxy)ethoxy]styryl}-4-(4-hexylsulfonyls-
tyryl)benzene 13. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl ) d 7.85 (d, J
8.49 Hz, 2H), 7.64 (d, J 8.52 Hz, 2H), 7.49 (s, 4H), 7.43 (d, J
3
4-[2-(2-Butoxyethoxy)ethoxy]benzaldehyde 8. 1H NMR
(300 MHz, CDCl ) d 9.85 (s, 1H), 7.79 (d, J 8.64 Hz, 2H), 6.99
8.79 Hz, 2H), 7.23 (d, J 16.38 Hz, 1H), 7.10 (d, J 16.41 Hz,
1H), 7.09 (d, J 16.41 Hz, 1H), 6.95 (d, J 16.26 Hz, 1H), 6.90 (d,
J 8.79 Hz, 2H), 4.14 (t, J 4.92 Hz, 2H), 3.86 (t, J 4.94 Hz, 2H),
3.71 (m, 2H), 3.59 (m, 2H), 3.46 (t, J 6.72 Hz, 2H), 3.07 (t, J
8.10 Hz, 2H), 1.70 (m, 2H), 1.56 (m, 2H), 1.33 (m, 4H), 1.24
(m, 4H), 0.90 (t, J 7.35 Hz, 3H), 0.84 (t, J 6.87 Hz, 3H). MS
(EI) m/z 590.2 (M+). HRMS (EI) C H O S: calc. 590.3066,
3
(d, J 8.82 Hz, 2H), 4.19 (t, J 4.79 Hz, 2H), 3.86 (t, J 4.79 Hz,
2H), 3.70 (m, 2H), 3.58 (m, 2H), 3.43 (t, J 6.72 Hz, 2H), 1.53
(m, 2H), 1.32 (m, 2H), 0.87 (t, J 7.80 Hz, 3H).
4-Hexylsulfonylbenzaldehyde, 9
36 46
5
To a stirred solution of 7 (400 mg, 1.8 mmol) in CH Cl at
found 590.3077. n (CH Cl )/cm−1 3029, 2960, 2933, 1591,
2
2
max
2 2
0 °C was slowly added MCPBA (650 mg, 3.6 mmol). After
stirring for 1 h, the white suspension was filtered off and the
filtrate was washed with Na CO solution, dried over anhy-
1514, 1459, 1307, 1250, 1176, 1143, 1111, 1089. Mp=216 °C.
Found: C, 73.20; H, 8.12; S, 5.16. C H O S requires C, 73.19;
H, 7.85; S, 5.43%.
36 46
5
2
3
drous MgSO and evaporated to dryness. The crude product
was then purified by silica gel chromatography using the
gradient elution technique with CH Cl –ethyl acetate as eluent
4
Diethyl 4-(4-decylsulfanylstyryl)benzylphosphonate 15. 1H
NMR (300 MHz, CDCl ) d 7.43 (d, J 8.79 Hz, 2H), 7.40 (d, J
8.61 Hz, 2H), 7.27 (d, J 8.37 Hz, 2H), 7.02 (s, 2H), 4.00 (m,
2
2
3
affording 350 g of 9 in 76% yield. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl )
d 10.12 (s, 1H), 8.07 (s, 4H), 3.10 (t, J 8.09 Hz, 2H), 1.69 (m,
2H), 1.34 (m, 2H), 1.23 (m, 4H), 0.83 (t, J 6.78 Hz, 3H).
3
4H), 3.14 (d, J 21.72 Hz, 2H), 2.91 (t, J 7.38 Hz, 2H), 1.62 (m,
2H), 1.40 (m, 2H), 1.23 (m, 20H), 0.86 (d, J 6.74 Hz, 3H). MS
(EI) m/z 502.1 (M+).
General procedure for the Wadsworth–Emmons reaction
To an equimolar solution of an aldehyde (i.e. 9: 89 mg,
0.34 mmol) and the corresponding phosphonate ester (i.e. 12:
Diethyl 4-(4-decylsulfonylstyryl)benzylphosphonate 16. 1H
NMR (300 MHz, CDCl ) d 7.85 (d, J 8.46 Hz, 2H), 7.63 (d, J
3
2008
J. Mater. Chem., 1998, 8(9), 2005–2009