Please do not adjust margins
RSC Advances
Page 2 of 7
DOI: 10.1039/C6RA22998K
ARTICLE
Journal Name
divided by a factor of about 2 after four cycles. According to was 17.5 and the weight ratio NaBH4/CoxCu1-x was 8. At the
the authors, this was likely caused by the oxidation of the beginning of the work, the temperature for the screening tests
catalytically active sites during hydrolysis of NH3BH3.16 In our was set at 40°C to allow fast successive experiments. For the
opinion, this is unlikely since aqueous solution of NH3BH3 is a stability experiments (with 5 successive cycles; details are
reducing medium; oxidation might take place post-hydrolysis.
given in sub-section 3.2), similar experimental conditions were
In the present article, cobalt-copper binary particles were used but, on the basis of the results of the kinetic study, the
targeted to be used in hydrolysis of NaBH4. Cobalt was doped temperature was 30°C. By decreasing the hydrolysis
with copper and the content of the latter was tuned to get the temperatures, it was targeted to have slower kinetics because
best catalytic activity (i.e. total conversion of 100% and highest deactivation (poisoning), if any, is more pronounced at lower
hydrogen generation rate) over one hydrolysis cycle. In our temperatures (slower adsorption/desorption rates onto the
conditions, cobalt-copper with a theoretical content of 10% of catalyst surface).
copper showed the best performance and consequently was
After the screening, two samples of the best CoxCu1-x
tested over five cycles. Loss of catalytic activity occurred, catalyst, respectively in fresh and used states, were
especially in terms of hydrogen generation rate. The selected characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD; X’Pert Pro
catalyst was then characterized in order to better understand diffractometer, using copper Kα radiation with λ = 1.5406 Å;
the reason(s) of deactivation. This is reported and discussed in the patterns were analyzed with the help of the software
details hereafter.
X’Pert HighScore), scanning electron microscopy (SEM; Hitachi
S4800 microscope), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy
(XPS; ESCALAB 250 from Thermo Electron with
a
Experimental
monochromatic source, Al Kα ray 1486.6 eV; analyzed surface
of 400 µm diameter; binding energies (BE) of all core levels
Cobalt nitrate hexahydrate Co(NO3)2⋅6H2O (Sigma-Aldrich),
copper chloride dihydrate CuCl2⋅2H2O (Sigma-Aldrich), sodium
referred to the C−C of C1s carbon at 284.8 eV).
borohydride NaBH4 (Acros Organics), L-ascorbic acid C6H8O6
(Sigma-Aldrich) and sodium hydroxide NaOH (Sigma-Aldrich)
were used as received. Sodium borohydride was stored and
handled in an argon-filled glove box (MBraun M200B, O2 < 0.1
ppm, H2O < 0.1 ppm). Ultrapure water (Millipore milli-Q,
resistivity > 18.2 MΩ cm) was used.
The cobalt-copper CoxCu1-x (x = 0, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 0.9,
1, and x as a mole ratio) catalysts were prepared according to
a procedure inspired from references.17,18 For every synthesis,
15 mg of CoxCu1-x were targeted. Typically, in a two-neck
round-bottom flask of 100 mL, the required masses of one or
two of the salts Co(NO3)2⋅2H2O and/or CuCl2⋅6H2O were
solubilized in 10 mL of water containing C6H8O6 (mole ratio
C6H8O6/(Co+Cu) of 4). The solution was kept under stirring, and
ultrasonicated 5 min. Then, 5 mL of an aqueous solution of
NaBH4 (mole ratio NaBH4/(Co+Cu) of 2) was added dropwise
and under stirring. The solution was kept under stirring for 10
min. A black suspension of particles formed. The catalyst was
finally recovered after centrifugation (3500 rpm, 15 min),
washing (3 times with water and ethanol) and drying (80°C, 2
h).
Figure 1. Screening of Co, Co0.9Cu0.1, Co0.75Cu0.25, Co0.5Cu0.5, Co0.25Cu0.75
,
Co0.1Cu0.9 and Cu: hydrogen evolution curves by hydrolysis of NaBH4
performed at 40°C (15 mg of catalyst, 120 mg of NaBH4, 1 mL of alkaline
water, [NaOH] = 0.5 M). For clarity, two graphs with different time scales are
proposed.
The CoxCu1-x catalysts were screened in hydrolysis of
NaBH4. The hydrogen evolution experiments were performed
as follows. In a glassy tube-like reactor, 15 mg of CoxCu1-x and 1
mL of water were introduced to be ultrasonicated for 10 min.
The reactor was immersed in an oil bath kept at constant
temperature (e.g. 40°C for the screening tests, and 30-60°C for
the kinetic study) and connected to a colored-water filled
inverted burette. To start the hydrogen generation by
hydrolysis of NaBH4, i.e. the catalytic reaction, 1 mL of alkaline
solution (NaOH, 0.5 M) of NaBH4 (120 mg) was injected in the
reactor. The hydrogen evolution was followed for 60 min and
was stopped even though the hydrolysis was not completed
(this was the case for two catalysts, i.e. Cu and Co0.1Cu0.9; cf.
sub-section 3.1). In our conditions, the mole ratio H2O/NaBH4
Results and discussion
Screening of the CoxCu1-x catalysts
The hydrogen evolution curves obtained with the CoxCu1-x
catalysts are reported in Figure 1. For clarity, the curves of Co,
Co0.9Cu0.1
, Co0.75Cu0.25 and Co0.5Cu0.5 and those of Co,
Co0.25Cu0.75, Co0.1Cu0.9 and Cu are plotted in separate graphs. In
our experimental conditions, the catalyst made of pure Cu is
not active in hydrolysis of NaBH4 whereas pure Co is active
with a total conversion of 100% reached in 7 min. The
hydrogen evolution curve of Co is typical with an induction
2 | J. Name., 2012, 00, 1-3
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
Please do not adjust margins