Conjugating a Cyanine Dye to a Polymer
Surface. In Search of a Monomeric Dye in
Apolar Media
Fabrizio Pertusati and Fredric M. Menger*
Department of Chemistry, Emory UniVersity, Atlanta, Georgia
30033
FIGURE 1. (a) Delocalization in a cyanine dye imparting +1/2 on
each nitrogen. (b) A colorless carbon analogue of the dye.
ReceiVed December 21, 2007
FIGURE 2. (a) A tight ion pair of the cyanine dye. (b) A dimer in
which both ion-paring and delocalization stabilization are possible.
The challenge, of course, is to devise a transiently nonreso-
nating cyanine system. One might presume that if the cyanine
were forced into a tight ion pair with its counteranion (Figure
2a), then the positive charge would be localized only at the
nitrogen proximate to the counteranion. Cyanine-type delocal-
ization within the ion pair would be impeded because the
cationic charge cannot readily shift to the other nitrogen. If this
did happen, the cationic and anionic charges would be widely
separated, imparting high energy to the contributor. Even if the
counteranion located itself equidistant from the two nitrogens,
charge separation would be substantial. In summary, the dye
as a tight ion pair would likely have lost some or all of its color.
When cyanine dyes are dissolved in nonpolar solvents,
conditions that favor tight ion pairing, their colors persist (in
apparent conflict with our prediction). Yet in actual fact, this
does not negate our speculations about possible color loss
because cyanine dyes in nonpolar solvents form dimers (or
higher J- and H-aggregates) in which both ion pairing and
delocalization effects are both readily accommodated (Figure
2b).1
Solution and solid-phase syntheses of a cyanine dye conju-
gated to polystyrene beads (desired for potentially interesting
electronic properties) are described.
Fascination with synthetic dyes can be traced back to 1856
when a precocious William Henry Perkin, only 18 years of age,
converted a coal tar derivative, aniline, into a purple dye he
called “mauve”. The discovery prompted Perkin to leave his
Royal College of Chemistry and build a factory that manufac-
tured his dye. Hundreds of synthetic dyes followed soon after
Perkin’s discovery: magenta (Verguin, 1858); methyl violet
(Lauth, 1861); Hofmann’s violet (Hofmann, 1862); alizarin
(Graebe and Lightfoot, 1868), and malachite green (Dobner and
Fisher, 1877) to name a few. A century-and-a-half after Perkin,
we initiated our own particular approach to dye construction
(although there are no immediate plans to abandon the comfort
of a university!). In order to understand the motivation for our
studies, certain important features of dye chemistry must be
detailed, and this will be done via cyanine dyes of the type
drawn in Figure 1a.
According to simple resonance theory, color arises from an
electron delocalization in which the two identical nitrogens each
bear exactly one-half of a positive charge. The longer the
distance between the conjugated nitrogens, the longer the
wavelength of light absorption. Now suppose nitrogen is
replaced by carbon as in the analog in Figure 1b. This compound
does not absorb in the visible range because there is far less
electron delocalization compared with the cyanine dye. The
comparison suggests that if one could somehow prevent
delocalization effects in the cyanine dye (i.e., impose conditions
that confine the compound to only one of the two delocalization
contributors), then the color would vanish. Exposing the dye to
“normal” conditions would cause the color to reappear. Thus,
the elements of a “color/no-color” switch would be in hand.
In order to preclude this complication, cyanine dyes must be
constructed that remain monomeric even in nonionizing media.
(1) (a) West, W.; Pearce, S. J. Phys. Chem. 1965, 69, 1894. (b)
Khairutdinov, R. F.; Serpone, N. J. Phys. Chem. B 1997, 101, 2602. (c)
Fidder, H.; Wursma, D. A. Phys. ReV. Lett. 1991, 66, 1501. (d) Perlatein,
J.; Penner, T. L.; Witten, D. G. Langmuir 2000, 16, 9042. (e) Da¨hne, S.;
Nolte, K. D. Chem. Commun. 1972, 1076.
(2) (a) Demchuck, M. I.; Ishcenko, A. A.; Mikhailov, V. P.; Avdeeva,
V. I. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1988, 144, 99. (b) Kwon, O. P.; Im, J-K.; Kim,
J-H.; Lee, S-H. Macromolecules 2000, 32, 9310. (c) Lindsay, G. A.; Ashley,
P. R.; Davis, M. C.; Guenthner, A. J.; Sanghadasa, M.; Wright, M. E. Mater.
Sci. Eng., B 2006, 132, 8-11. (d) Barlow, S.; Marde, S. R. Nonlinear Optical
Properties of Organic Materials. In Functional Organic Materials; Mu¨ller,
T. J. J., Bunz, U. H. F., Eds.; Wiley & Sons: New York, 2007; Chapter
11, pp 393-437. (e) Onclin, S.; Ravoo, J. B.; Reinhoudt, D. N. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 6282. (f) Pereverzev, Y. V.; Oleg, V. P.; Dalton,
L. R. ChemPhysChem 2004, 5, 1821. (g) Wu¨rthner, F.; Wortmann, R.;
Meerholz, K. ChemPhysChem 2002, 3, 17. (h) Van der Boom, M. E. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. .2002, 41, 3363. (i) Grishina, A. D.; Pereshivko, L. Y.;
Tameev, A. R.; Krivenko, T. V.; Savelyev, V. V.; Vannikov, A. V.;
Rychwalski, R. W. Synth. Met. 2004, 144, 113.
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: 404-727-6599. Fax:
404-727-6586.
10.1021/jo7027294 CCC: $40.75 © 2008 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 02/29/2008
J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 2939-2942
2939