254
K.P. Maresca et al. / Inorganica Chimica Acta 284 (1999) 252±257
2.2.3.2. [ReO{(ꢂ3-SCH2CH2)2S}(C6H4Cl-4-CH2S)] (3).
(Yield: 0.006 g, 51%). Calc. for C11H14OS4ClRe (mol.
wt. 512.11): C, 25.80; H, 2.74. Found: C, 25.94; H,
2.90%. IR (KBr, cm 1): 1508 (m), 1489 (m), 1421 (w),
1247 (s), 1185 (m), 1091 (m), 1016 (w), 964 (s), 836 (m). 1H
NMR (CD2Cl2, ppm): 2.75 (m, 2H), 3.14 (m, 2H), 3.90 (m,
2H), 4.25 (m, 2H), 4.95 (s, 2H), 6.80 (dd, 1H), 7.13 (dd, 1H),
crystals were grown by slow diffusion of pentane into a
solution of 7 in CH2Cl2. IR (KBr, cm 1): 3463 (w), 2678
(w), 1640 (m), 1429 (m), 1032 (w), 959 (s), 855 (w).
2.3. X-ray crystallography
The crystals of 27 were studied using a Siemens SMART
diffractometer system with graphite-monochromated Mo
7.27 (dd, 1H), 7.40 (dd, 1H). Cyclic voltammetry (E1/2
CH2Cl2): 1.58 V, 1.19 V (ÁEp 110 mV).
,
Ê
Kꢃ radiation (ꢄ (Mo Kꢃ) 0.71073 A). All the data col-
lections were carried out at 150 K except for the collection
of 5 which was carried out under ambient conditions. The
crystal parameters and other experimental details of the data
collections are summarized in Table 1. A complete descrip-
tion of the details of the crystallographic methods is given in
Section 5. The structures were solved by direct methods
[18]. Neutral atom scattering factors were taken from
Cromer and Waber [19] and anomalous dispersion correc-
tions were taken from those of Creagh and McAuley [20].
All calculations were performed using SHELXTL [21]. Non-
hydrogen atoms were re®ned anisotropically. No anomalies
were encountered in the re®nements of any of the structures.
2.2.3.3. [ReO{(ꢂ3-SCH2CH2)2S}(C6H4F-4-CH2S)] (4).
(Yield: 0.006 g, 44%). Calc. for C11H14OFS4Re (mol. wt.
495.70): C, 26.66; H, 2.83. Found: C, 27.03; H, 3.07%. IR
(KBr, cm 1): 1623 (m), 1508 (m), 1421 (m), 1222 (s), 1218
1
(w), 1083 (s), 963 (s). H NMR (CD2Cl2, ppm): 2.83 (m),
3.29 (m), 4.07 (m), 4.44 (m), 5.09 (s), 6.98 (m), 7.14 (m),
7.25 (m), 7.54 (m). Cyclic voltammetry (E1/2, CH2Cl2):
1.58 V, 1.16 V (ÁEp 90 mV).
2.2.3.4. [ReO{(ꢂ3-SCH2CH2)2S}(C6H4OMe-4-CH2S)] (5).
(Yield: 0.007 g, 60%). X-ray suitable crystals were grown
by slow diffusion of pentane into a solution of 5 in CH2Cl2
whereupon it lost the CH3OH. Calc. for C13H22O3S4Re
(mol. wt. 539.7): C, 30.30; H, 4.16. Found: C, 29.69; H,
3.71%. IR (KBr, cm 1): 1608 (m), 1512 (s), 1420 (w), 1303
3. Results and discussion
1
3.1. Synthesis and general properties
(w), 1257 (s), 1176 (m), 1036 (m), 960 (s), 830 (m). H
NMR (CD2Cl2, ppm): 3.12 (m), 3.61 (s), 3.78 (m), 3.93 (m),
4.30 (m), 4.93 (s), 6.83 (m), 6.86 (m), 7.19 (m), 7.34 (m).
Cyclic voltammetry (E1/2, CH2Cl2): 1.56 V, 1.22 V
(ÁEp 110 mV).
The choice of [n-(C4H9)4N][ReOBr4(OPPh3)] as starting
material was predicated on its potential for clinical applica-
tions. The more commonly employed oxorhenium (V)-
halide starting material ReOCl4 is extremely moisture
sensitive and thus an unlikely starting material for radio-
pharmaceutical applications. Although the synthesis of the
[n-(C4H9)4N][ReOBr4(OPPh3)] requires several steps it is
facile and high yield. The IR spectrum of [n-
(C4H9)4N][ReOBr4(OPPh3)] displays ꢅ(C±H) for the
2.2.4. Preparation of [ReO{(ꢂ3-SCH2CH2)2S}-
(ꢂ1-SCH2CH2SCH2CH2SH)] (6)
To a re¯uxing solution of [ReOCl3(DMS)(OPPh3)]
(0.050 g, 0.0765 mmol) in 30 ml of ethanol was added
dropwise 2-mercaptoethyl sul®de (0.035 g, 0.229 mmol)
whereupon the reaction mixture was stirred and re¯uxed
for 1 h and then evaporated to orange±brown residue. Red,
X-ray suitable crystals of 6 were grown by slow diffusion of
pentane into a solution of the residue in CH2Cl2 (yield:
0.003 g, 10%). IR (KBr, cm 1): 3433 (m), 1654 (w), 1438
(s), 1122 (s), 962 (s), 727 (m), 693 (m), 539 (s).
[Bu4N] cation at 2961 and 2872 cm 1, ꢅ(C±C) at
1466 cm 1, and a strong band assigned to ꢅ(Re=O) at
993 cm 1. The pink solid was inde®nitely air and moisture
stable making it suitable for probing the reactivities of a
variety of ligand types.
The synthesis of [ReOBr{(SCH2CH2)2S}] (1) employs
the route of Fietz et al. [11], but instead of using ReOCl4
the less moisture sensitive [ReOBr4(OPPh3)] was used.
The starting material was placed in an ice-bath to prevent
possible dimerization. The tridentate bis(2-mercaptoethyl)
sul®de was added dropwise in 5 ml of chloroform over a
period of 20 min. The gray±blue solution was stirred in the
ice-bath for an additional 30 min at which time it was
vacuumed down to residue. To the residue was added
1 ml of chloroform which produced [ReOBr{(SCH2-
CH2)2S}] (1) as a blue precipitate. The IR spectrum of 1
2.2.5. Preparation of [ReO{(ꢂ3-SCH2CH2)2S}-
{ꢂ1-SCH2CH(OH)CH(OH)CH2SH}] (7)
To
a re¯uxing solution of [ReOBr(SCH2CH2)2S]
(0.010 g, 0.0230 mmol) in 5 ml of acetonitrile was added
dropwise a solution of dithiothreitol (0.004 g, 0.0250 mmol)
in 1 ml of acetonitrile. The solution remained blue until the
addition of NEt3 (0.009 g, 0.092 mmol) whereupon the
reaction mixture immediately changed from blue to
orange±brown. The solution was stirred and re¯uxed for
an additional 15 min and then evaporated to residue. The
brown residue was washed with 2 ml of ethanol which
produced an orange precipitate which was ®ltered and
allowed to air dry (yield: 0.005 g, 43%). X-ray suitable
1
is dominated by a strong peak at 964 cm attributed to
1
ꢅ(Re=O). The H NMR spectrum contains multiplets at
2.51, 3.21, 4.07 and 4.15 ppm assignable to each of the CH2
moiety comprising backbone of the ligand. All four of the