Preparation of 2a: To a stirred solution of 1a (34.2 mg, 0.050 mmol) in
(Table 1). It is quite surprising that the reaction proceeds in an
intermolecular fashion and not in the expected intramolecular
way. Even more surprising is that only the aromatic ring
attached to the C-2 carbon of the sugar moiety underwent the
coupling reaction, while the aromatic ring on the C-3 carbon of
the sugar remained intact. However, it has been observed that
the substituent on the C-3 aromatic ring exerts a great influence
on this biaryl coupling reaction. High yields of the products
were obtained in the case where the aromatic ring on the C-3
carbon of the sugar was substituted with three methoxy groups
at the 3’, 4’ and 5’ positions. Bulkier substituents on the C-3
aromatic ring reduce the yield of the desired product, while no
reaction was observed at all with the unsubstituted one.
Noteworthy is that only the a-d-glucopyranoside derivative is
effective in bringing about this coupling reaction. No coupling
reaction took place with the diaroyl derivatives of methyl-b-d-
glucopyranoside. Substituted diaroyl derivatives derived from
other carbohydrate molecules such as galactose or mannose
proved unsuccessful for this reaction. Furthermore, the choice
of the Lewis acid used to activate PIFA seems to be critical.
Among tested Lewis acids such as BF3•Et2O, BF3•Bu2O, BCl3,
ZnBr2, TiCl4, SnCl4, Et2AlCl, FeCl3, MgCl2, Sn(OTf)3 and
TMSOTf, only BF3•Et2O was found to be an efficient activator
in the present case.
CH2Cl2 (0.50 ml) was added a solution of PIFA (21.5 mg, 0.050 mmol) and
BF3•Et2O (0.013 ml, 0.100 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (0.50 ml) at 240 °C under
nitrogen atmosphere, and the reaction was stirred at the same temperature
for 20 min. The reaction was quenched by the addition of saturated
NaHCO3, extracted with CH2Cl2, washed with brine, dried over Na2SO4
and evaporated. After column chromatography (n-hexane–AcOEt = 1:1),
2a (27.0 mg, 0.0197 mmol, 79%) and 1a (4.0 mg, 12%) were obtained as
colorless needles. Selected data for 2a: mp 168.0–170.0 °C (from Et2O);
dH(500 MHz, CDCl3) 1.47 (6H, s), 3.32 (6H, s), 3.45 (6H, s), 3.57–3.63
(4H, m), 3.80 (6H, s), 3.82 (6H, s), 3.91 (6H, s), 3.92 (12H, s), 3.96–4.06
(4H, m), 4.64 (2H, dd, J 9.77, 3.66), 4.75 (2H, d, J 3.66), 5.86 (2H, dd, J
9.77, 9.77), 7.20 (2H, s), 7.33 (4H, s), 7.33–7.37 (10H, m); dC(75.0 MHz,
CDCl3) 31.78, 55.13, 55.65, 56.25, 60.39, 60.82, 60.95, 62.99, 63.73, 70.10,
72.32, 73.01, 97.50, 102.15, 107.06, 109.31, 124.56, 124.54, 125.14,
126.59, 128.13, 128.83, 140.29, 142.65, 145.51, 150.87, 152.03, 153.09,
165.22, 165.41; IR nmax(KBr)/cm21 1728, 1338, 1223 cm21; m/z (FAB)
1366 (M+); HRMS (FAB): calc. for C70H78O28Na 1389.4578, found
1389.4561. Anal. calc. for C70H78O28: C, 61.49; H, 5.75. Found: C, 61.09;
H, 5.73.
1 G. I. Nonaka, I. Nishioka, M. Nishizawa, T. Yamagishi, Y. Kashiwada,
G. E. Dutschman, A. J. Bodner, R. E. Kilkuskie, T.-C. Cheng and K.- H.
Lee, J. Nat. Prod., 1990, 53, 587.
2 (a) K. F. Bastow, I. D. Bori, Y. Fukushima,Y. Kashiwada, T. Tanaka, G.
I. Nonaka, I. Nishioka and K.-H. Lee, Planta Med., 1993, 59, 240; (b)
D. E. Berry, L. MacKenzie, E. A. Shultis, J. A. Chan and S. M. Hecht,
J. Org. Chem., 1992, 57, 420.
3 For example, H. Okamura, A. Mimura, Y. Yakou, M. Niwano and Y.
Takahara, Phytochemistry, 1993, 33, 557.
4 R. Noyori, Chem. Soc. Rev., 1989, 18, 187; S. Inoue, H. P. Takaya, K.
Tani, S. Otsuka, T. Sato and R. Noyori, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1990, 112,
4897.
In order to obtain the chiral biaryl compound, the coupled
adducts (2a–c, e) were treated with LiAlH4. In all cases, the
optically active biphenyl compound (3) was obtained in
quantitative yield, with the regeneration of the chiral sugar
auxiliary, which can be used for successive reactions. The
optical purity of 3 was determined by HPLC to be > 99%,
according to the procedure of Meyers.5d,10
5 (a) K. S. Feldman and S. M. Ensel, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1993, 115, 1162;
(b) K. S. Feldman, S. M. Ensel and R. D. Minard, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1994, 116, 1742; (c) K. S. Feldman and S. M. Ensel, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1994, 116, 3357; (d) T. D. Nelson and A. I. Meyers, J. Org. Chem.,
1994, 59, 2577; (e) B. H. Lipshutz, Z.-P. Liu and F. Kayser, Tetrahedron
Lett., 1994, 35, 5567; (f) K. S. Feldman and A. Sambandam, J. Org.
Chem., 1995, 60, 8171; (g) K. F. Feldman and R. S. Smith, J. Org.
Chem., 1996, 61, 2606; (h) A. I. Meyers, J. Heterocyclic Chem., 1998,
35, 991; (i) K. S. Feldman and K. L. Hunter, Tetrahedron Lett., 1998,
39, 8943; (j) D. Dai and O. R. Martin, J. Org. Chem., 1998, 63, 7628.
6 Y. Kita, H. Tohma, M. Inagaki, K. Hatanaka and T. Yakura,
Tetrahedron Lett., 1991, 32, 4321.
7 Y. Kita, H. Tohma, K. Hatanaka, T. Takada, S. Fujita, S. Mitoh, H.
Sakurai and S. Oka, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1994, 116, 3684.
8 (a) Y. Kita, T. Takada, S. Mihara and H. Tohma, Synlett, 1995, 211; (b)
Y. Kita, T. Takada, S. Mihara, B. A. Whelan and H. Tohma, J. Org.
Chem., 1995, 60, 7144.
A plausible explanation for this unexpected intermolecular
coupling reaction could be that the sugar moiety and the
trimethoxybenzoyl group present at the C-3 carbon of the sugar
have a spacial interaction, thereby favorably positioning the
aromatic ring on the C-2 carbon to couple with another like
molecule.
In summary, we have encountered an unexpected inter-
molecular biaryl coupling reaction induced by PIFA. The
reaction proceeds in high yields and with remarkable diaster-
eoselectivity. The importance of chiral biaryl compounds in
organic synthesis as well as in biological sciences, coupled with
the use of a hypervalent iodine(iii) reagent as a low-toxic
reagent, render this method attractive for the synthesis of
optically active biphenyl compounds. Detailed investigation of
this interesting reaction is in progress.
9 (a) Y. Kita, M. Gyoten, M. Otsubo, H. Tohma and T. Takada, Chem.
Commun., 1996, 1481; (b) T. Takada, M. Arisawa, M. Gyoten, R.
Hamada, H. Tohma and Y. Kita, J. Org. Chem., 1998, 63, 7698.
10 We followed the protocol of Meyers et al., while determining the ee of
the biphenyl compound 3. According to them [ref. 5(d)] in such cases,
HPLC was found to be a more reliable method for the determination of
ee than by optical rotation. They encountered a discrepancy in the
optical rotation of a similar compound.
Notes and references
† Preparation of 1a: A solution of methyl-4,6-O-(1A-methylbenzylidene)-a-
d-glucopyranoside (ref. 11) (2.22 g, 7.5 mmol), DMAP (183 mg, 1.5 mmol),
DCC (3.25 g, 15.75 mmol) and 3,4,5-trimethoxybenzoic acid (3.18 g, 15.0
mmol) in CH2Cl2 (125 ml) was stirred at room temperature for 12 h. The
precipitate was filtered and the mother liquor was subjected to column
chromatography (n-hexane–AcOEt = 3:2), giving 1a (4.68 g, 6.83 mmol,
91.0 %) as colorless needles. Mixed benzoates 1c–f were synthesized from
methyl-4,6-O-(1A-methylbenzylidene)-2-(3A,4A,5A-trimethoxybenzoyl)-a-d-
glucopyranoside, which in turn was regioselectively prepared from methyl-
4,6-O-(1A-methylbenzylidene)-a-d-glucopyranoside using 1-(benzoyloxy)-
benzotriazole (ref. 12).
11 A. Lipták and P. Pügedi, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1983, 22,
255.
12 S. Kim, H. Chang and W. J. Kim, J. Org. Chem., 1985, 50, 1751.
Communication 8/09680E
470
Chem. Commun., 1999, 469–470