J . Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 3191-3194
3191
tions to this rule have emerged. The reduction potentials
of alkyl radicals lie in the order I° < II° < III°, i.e.,
primary radicals are the easiest to reduce and tertiary
are the hardest.1,7 Alkyl iodides are easier to reduce than
bromides, which in turn are easier to reduce than
chlorides.1 Considering this and the dependence of
reduction potential on the degree of substitution in the
radical, one can readily understand the fact that, for tert-
butyl iodide E1 is positive of E2, resulting in two well-
resolved voltammetric waves.8 Secondary alkyl iodides
give rise to long-lived radical intermediates,9,10a but
primary iodides are reduced to carbanions.10 Tertiary
bromides represent a borderline situation: they exhibit
two barely resolved one-electron waves in some solvents11
and a single two-electron wave in others.8 As long as
the cathode does not consist of a material such as
mercury which can react with radicals,12 one may use
the relative yield of radical coupling product RR as a good
approximate measure of the lifetime (before reduction)
of the radicals R• produced by electrochemical reduction
of a given alkyl halide R-Hal. Such dimers are formed
relatively rarely, and some apparent dimer-forming reac-
tions actually correspond to SN2 displacement on the
alkyl halide by the carbanion intermediate.9
Electr och em ica l F or m a tion a n d
Dim er iza tion of r-Su bstitu ted Ben zyl
Ra d ica ls. Ster ic Effects on Dim er iza tion
Albert J . Fry,*,† J ohn M. Porter, and Peter F. Fry
Department of Chemistry, Wesleyan University,
Middletown, Connecticut 06459
Received August 29, 1995X
The mechanism of electrochemical cleavage of the
carbon-halogen bond is well established.1 Overall, the
reduction consumes two electrons, which are transferred
in two steps (Scheme 1). In the first (and potential-
Sch em e 1
E1
R-Hal + e- 98 R• + X-
E2
R• + e- 98 R-
R- + H+ f RH
In this context, benzylic halides represent an interest-
ing situation. Benzyl chlorides undergo the usual two-
electron reduction to a benzylic carbanion,13 but benzyl
bromides 1d -f exhibit two closely-spaced voltammetric
waves in dimethylformamide (DMF), and the products
change from radical type (RR) to carbanion type (RH)
over electrolysis potentials of just a few tenths of a volt.7,14
The R-chlorobenzyl radical (2a ) is easier to reduce than
benzal chloride (C6H5CHCl2), so it cannot be produced
by direct electrochemical reduction of benzal chloride.15
determining) step, one electron is transferred and the
carbon-halogen bond is broken to produce a free radical.
A second electron transfer then converts the radical to a
carbanion. Generally, the carbanion abstracts a proton
from the medium to produce the dehalogenated species
RH, but in aprotic media the carbanion may be trapped
by a variety of added electrophiles such as silyl halides,2
activated alkenes,3 and carbon dioxide and carbonyl
compounds.4 It is much more difficult to trap the
corresponding radicals in these reductions. As a result
of a great deal of experimentation in a number of
laboratories, the reasons for this difficulty have gradually
emerged. It turns out that for most alkyl halides, E1,
the potential necessary to produce the radical R•, is
negative of E2, the reduction potential of the radical, so
that R• is reduced very quickly as it is formed. Experi-
mentally, this means that most alkyl halides exhibit a
single two-electron voltammetric wave.1a By balancing
the rate of electron transfer to the radical against an
intramolecular isomerization process of known rate,5,6 it
can be estimated that the radical intermediates in most
alkyl halide electrolyses have lifetimes less than 1 µs. In
general, therefore, it will be especially difficult to trap
such radicals intermolecularly. However, a few excep-
We recently showed, however, that 2a can be prepared
by indirect electrolysis, that is, by electrocatalytic reduc-
tion of benzal chloride by electrochemically generated
cobalt(I) bis(salicylideneethylenediamine).16 Under these
conditions, radical 2a undergoes efficient coupling to 1,2-
(7) (a) Fry, A. J .; Powers, T. A. J . Org. Chem. 1987, 52, 2498. (b)
Yamasaki, R. B.; Tarle, M.; Casanova, J . J . Org. Chem. 1979, 44, 4519.
(8) Hoffmann, A. K.; Hodgson, W. G.; Maricle, D. L.; J ura, W. H. J .
Am. Chem. Soc. 1964, 86, 631.
(9) (a) Mubarak, M. S.; Peters, D. G. J . Org. Chem. 1982, 47, 3397.
(b) Peters, D. G.; Willett, B. C. J . Electroanal. Chem. 1981, 123, 291.
(10) (a) Cleary, J . A.; Mubarak, M. S.; Vieira, K. L.; Anderson, M.
R.; Peters, D. G. J . Electroanal. Chem. 1986, 198, 107. (b) La Perriere,
D. M.; Carroll, W. F., J r.; Willett, B. C.; Torp, E. C.; Peters, D. G. J .
Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 7561.
(11) (a) Vieira, K. L.; Peters, D. G. J . Org. Chem. 1986, 51, 1231.
(b) Fry, A. J .; Krieger, R. L. J . Org. Chem. 1976, 41, 54.
(12) (a) Webb, J . L.; Mann, C. K.; Walborsky, H. M. J . Am. Chem.
Soc. 1970, 92, 2042. (b) Casanova, J .; Rogers, H. R. J . Am. Chem. Soc.
1974, 96, 1942.
(13) Marple. L. W.; Hummelstedt, L. E. I.; Rogers, L. B. J . Electro-
chem. Soc. 1960, 107, 437.
† Correspondence may be adressed to: Dr. Albert J . Fry, Department
of Chemistry, Wesleyan University, Middletown, CT 06459. Phone:
(203) 685-2622. Fax: (203) 685-2211. E-mail: afry@wesleyan.edu.
X Abstract published in Advance ACS Abstracts, April 1, 1996.
(1) (a) Fry, A. J . Synthetic Organic Electrochemistry, 2nd ed.;
Wiley: New York, 1989; Chapter 5. (b) Peters, D. In Organic
Electrochemistry, 3rd ed.; Lund, H., Baizer, M. M., Eds.; Dekker: New
York, 1991; pp 361-400.
(2) (a) Yoshida, J .-I.; Muraki, K.; Funahashi, H.; Kawabata, N. J .
Org. Chem. 1986, 51, 3996. (b) Fry, A. J .; Touster, J . J . Org. Chem.
1989, 54, 4829.
(3) Baizer, M. M.; Chruma, J . L. J . Org. Chem. 1972, 37, 1951.
(4) (a) Silvestri, G.; Gambino, S.; Filardo, G.; Greco, G.; Gulotta, A.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1984, 25, 4307. (b) Sibille, S.; d’Incan, E.; Leport,
L.; Pe´richon, J . Tetrahedron Lett. 1986, 27, 3129. (c) d’Incan, E.; Sibille,
S.; Pe´richon, J .; Moingeon, M. O.; Chaussard, J . Tetrahedron Lett. 1986,
27, 4175.
(5) (a) Fry, A. J .; Mitnick, M. A. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1969, 91, 6207.
(b) Similar results are obtained in the electrochemical reduction of
6-bromo-1-hexene, where the product consists of roughly equal amounts
of methylcyclohexane and 1-hexene.6
(14) Yamasaki, R. B.; Tarle, M.; Casanova, J . J . Org. Chem. 1979,
44, 4519.
(15) Fry A. J .; Sirisoma, U. N. J . Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 4919; 1994,
58, 2914.
(16) (a) Fry, A. J .; Sirisoma, U. N.; Lee, A. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993,
34, 809. (b) Fry, A. J .; Singh, A. H. J . Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 8172.
(6) Reed, R. G. Ph.D. thesis, Wesleyan University, 1971.
S0022-3263(95)01577-5 CCC: $12.00 © 1996 American Chemical Society