Organic Letters
Letter
least formally, the reaction of 3a with one equivalent of 1a.
We carried out some experiments to test this hypothesis using
the polychromatic Hg lamp and a Pyrex reaction immersion
vessel (Table 2). First, a control reaction was run, whereby a
1 mM solution of thietane 3a alone was irradiated for 3 h. No
trace of 4a was found; instead, a retro-[2 + 2] cleavage took
place to furnish 3,3-diphenylacrylonitrile 7a in a 85% yield
(Table 2, entry 1).14 This indicated that 4a could not be
formed from 3a alone. The irradiation of an equimolar
mixture of 3a and 1a gave 55% of the target compound 4a in
addition to 31% of the side product 7a (Table 2, entry 2).
When the reaction was repeated using 2 equiv of 1a, the
target tetrahydrothiophene 4a was obtained in a 76% yield
after only 1 h (Table 2, entry 3). We examined the reaction at
a high concentration (130 mM) but, as expected, this was
deleterious to the ring enlargement reaction, and a high yield
(76%) of 7a was obtained instead (Table 2, entry 4). Two
additional control reactions were performed in which 3a and
1a were heated in the dark with or without a radical initiator
(Table 2, entries 5 or 6, respectively), which induced no
transformation. Collectively, these observations confirm that
the formation of tetrahydrothiophene 4a from thietane 3a is a
photochemically induced ring enlargement that requires the
presence of 1a and proceeds faster than the competitive
unimolecular retro-[2 + 2] cleavage of 3a. They also strongly
support the contention that the overall transformation of 1a
and 2 to tetrahydrothiophene 4a is a domino process
including two independent photochemical reactions.
Scheme 2. Synthesis of Thietanes 3
The “hetero” tetra-aryl tetrahydrothiophenes 4ab−ae, respec-
tively, were obtained in good to excellent yields (66−90%),
each as a unique regioisomer; the regioselectivity was
established by the X-ray diffraction analysis of compound
4ac. Diarylthietanes 3b and 3c each reacted with 1a to furnish
the tetra-aryl tetrahydrothiophenes 4ba and 4ca, respectively,
in good yields (84% and 70%), again as single regioisiomers.
It was apparent that 4ba and 4ca were regioisomers of 4ab
and 4ac, respectively. The tetra-aryl tetrahydrothiophene 4cb
was also prepared from thietane 3c and 4,4′-dimethylth-
iobenzophenone 2b in an 86% yield, again as a single
regioisomer. Diphenylthietane 3a reacted with 3,3′-bis-
(trifluoromethyl)thiobenzophenone 1f to give the tetra-aryl
tetrahydrothiophene 4af, once more as a single regioisomer,
in a more modest yield (38%). Finally, the diastereoselectivity
of the ring enlargement reaction was evaluated. As expected,
the reaction between diphenylthietane 3a and the unsym-
metrical 4-methylthiobenzophenone 1g provided a mixture of
the two diastereoisomers of compound 4ag in a 1:1 ratio
Table 2. Conditions of the Ring Enlargement Reaction
1
(determined by H NMR signal integration) in a 67% yield.
[3a]
entry (mM)
equiv of
1a
yield of 4a yield of 7a
From the early work of Ohno and De Mayo, the thia-
a
conditions
(%)
(%)
̀
Paterno−Buchi reaction between 1a and 2 is known to occur
̈
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
1
1
130
1
1
0
1
2
2
2
2
25 °C, 3 h
25 °C, 3 h
25 °C, 1 h
0
55
76
0
0
0
85
31
0
76
0
from the S2 (π, π*) excited state of the thione and proceed
via a thermally unstable 1,3-dithiane intermediate, which
decomposes to give the thietane 3a.11a,c A number of studies
on thioketone or thioester photodimerization evoke an
important role for the T1 (n, π*) excited state, which evolves
by the formation of a carbene intermediate,15 a process that
25 °C, 4 h
25 to 80 °C, 5 h
25 to 80 °C, 24 h
b
c
0
a
may implicate a hydrogen abstraction reaction.13,16
A
For entries 1−4, no thietane was present at the end of the reaction.
For entries 5 and 6, the thietane and thiobenzophenone starting
mechanistic proposal for the photochemical ring enlargement
reaction is presented in Scheme 4. We suggest that
thiobenzophenone 1a reacts from its T1 (n, π*) excited
state by hydrogen abstraction to provide a carbene
intermediate that then reacts with thietane 3a to form a
sulfonium ylide.17 The latter undergoes a regioselective thia-
Stevens rearrangement in a regioselective manner to give the
product 4a. The regioselectivity of the ring enlargement can
be explained by the geminal diaryl substituent suite, which
weakens the vicinal carbon−sulfur bond.
The formation of compounds 5 and 6 when 1a and 2 were
irradiated in tetrahydrofuran (Table 1, entry 14) is in full
agreement with the implication of thiobenzophenone in its T1
(n, π*) state. The key effect of the concentration of 1a in the
reaction medium on the product selectivity can be also
rationalized by the implication of the T1 (n, π*) state of
thiobenzophenone for the ring enlargement. It has been
demonstrated by Maciejewski, Ramamurthy, and De Mayo18
that low thione concentrations prevent the triplet decay
b
c
materials were recovered entirely. Performed in the dark. Performed
in the dark in the presence of a radical initiator (AIBN).
On the basis of the above results, we reasoned that it
should be possible to employ a different thiobenzophenone in
each of the two photochemical transformations when
conducted separately. This would facilitate substituent
diversification and lead to “hetero” tetra-aryl tetrahydrothio-
phenes. For this purpose, we prepared thietane 3a on 10
mmol scale (about a 2 g scale) with similar efficiency (41%
yield), and we synthesized two further thietanes from 4,4′-
dimethylthiobenzophenone 1b and 4,4′-dichlorothiobenzo-
phenone 1c; compounds 3b and 3c, respectively, were
obtained in 39% and 42% yields (Scheme 2).
Using the optimal conditions from Table 2 (entry 3),
diphenylthietane 3a was reacted with a selection of 4,4′-
disubstituted thiobenzophenones 1b−e bearing diversely
electron-rich and electron-poor substituents (Scheme 3).
C
Org. Lett. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX