Acknowledgements
We would like to thank ICI Acrylics PLC for financial support
of this project (Strategic Research Fund).
Notes and references
‡ Crystal data for complex 4, C30H33MoO3P3, M = 630.41, T = 20 ЊC,
monoclinic, space group P21/n (no. 14), a = 9.399(4), b = 17.59(3),
c = 34.22(2) Å, β = 90.15(3)Њ, V = 5656(10) Å3, Z = 8, D = 1.481 g cmϪ3
,
µ(Mo-Kα) = 0.664 mmϪ1
, independent reflections = 14926 (Rint =
0.0968), 2θ range for data collection 3.6 < 2θ < 39.6Њ, R1 (I > 2σ) =
0.0484, wR2 (all data) = 0.0924. Equivalent 1,2- and 1,3-distances
involving the disordered atoms were restrained to be equal. Rigid-bond
and similarity restraints were used as well. Pseudo-orthorhombic twin-
ning was encountered (aЈ = Ϫa, bЈ = b, cЈ = c), contribution of minor
component 0.1954(15). CCDC reference number 186/1351. See http://
www.rsc.org/suppdata/dt/1999/1045/ for crystallographic files in .cif
format.
Fig. 1 ZORTEP plot of 4 (50% probability ellipsoids), showing the
two crystallographically independent molecules 4a and 4b. Selected
average bond distances (Å) and angles (Њ): P–C (ring) 1.817(13), Mo–P
2.493(4), Mo–C 1.933(13), C–O 1.174(13), non-bonded P–P 3.536(6);
P–Mo–P 90.37(14), C–Mo–C 90.27(5), C–Mo–P 177.38(4), R–P–Mo
116.3(4).
§ See supplementary data for experimental details: Selected data for
complex 2: δP 134.0; δH PCH2 2.33 and 2.14, PCH2CH2 2.22 and 1.57;
ν(CO) cmϪ1 1970 and 1879. Complex 3: δP 119.0; δH PCH2 2.55 and
2.27, PCH2CH2 2.21 and 1.74; ν(CO) cmϪ1 1961 and 1876. Complex 4:
δP 10.9; δH PCH2 2.06 and 1.90, PCH2CH2 2.05; δC 128.26 (dd, m-Ph,
have been drawn in the chair configuration with greatest occu-
pancy. The exception is the methylene (C38) lying in the C3v
plane opposite P4 which is found only in the chair configur-
ation. The metrical parameters are otherwise comparable to the
2-propyl analogue, [([12]aneP3Pri3)Mo(CO)3].1d
5
3JPC = 6, JPC = 3 Hz); ν(CO) cmϪ1 1917 and 1809. Compound 5,
δP Ϫ34.6; δH PCH2 2.16 and 1.93, PCH2CH2 1.73 and 1.57. Analytical
data: 2, found: C, 28.74; H, 3.41. Calc. for C12H18O3P3Cl3Mo: C, 28.51;
H, 3.59. 3, found: C, 23.10; H, 2.78. Calc. for C12H18O3P3Br3Mo: C,
22.56; H, 2.84. 4, found: C, 56.98; H, 5.32. Calc. for C30H33O3P3Mo: C,
57.15; H, 5.25. 5, found: C, 71.99; H, 7.38. Calc. for C27H33P3: C, 71.99;
H, 7.33%. Satisfactory mass spectroscopic data were obtained.
The methylene protons on both the α- and β-ring carbons are
diastereotopic and could be expected to have distinct environ-
ments while structural evidence indicates they could exist in
either the boat or chair conformation. In solution, a rapid equi-
librium between these conformations would be expected to
broaden their NMR resonances, the disorder of the β-ring
carbons in the solid state structure for 4 presumably reflects a
low energy difference between the two conformations. This
expected behaviour is seen for the new complexes and for the
free ligand where small differences in δ (NMR) are observed
for the diastereotopic α-methylene protons in 4§ and the α- and
β-methylene protons appear as broad multiplets. These reson-
ances are shifted significantly upfield in the free macrocycle 5 as
compared to 4 especially the β-methylene peaks δH 2.05 to 1.73
and 1.57.
1 (a) P. G. Edwards, J. S. Fleming and S. S. Liyanage, J. Chem. Soc.,
Dalton Trans., 1997, 193; (b) P. G. Edwards, J. S. Fleming, S. S.
Liyanage, S. J. Coles and M. B. Hursthouse, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton
Trans., 1996, 1801; (c) S. J. Coles, P. G. Edwards, J. S. Fleming and
M. B. Hursthouse, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1995, 4091; (d) S. J.
Coles, P. G. Edwards, J. S. Fleming and M. B. Hursthouse, J. Chem.
Soc., Dalton Trans., 1995, 1139.
2 P. G. Edwards, J. S. Fleming and S. S. Liyanage, Inorg. Chem., 1996,
35, 4563.
3 R. Rabinowitz and J. Pellon, J. Org. Chem., 1961, 26, 4623; W. A.
Henderson and S. A. Buckler, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1960, 82, 5794;
E. Steininger, Chem. Ber., 1963, 96, 3184; A. N. Pudovik, G. V.
Romanov and V. M. Pozhidaev, IZV. Akad. Nauk. SSSR, Ser. Khim.,
1977, 9, 2172.
It is interesting to note that long range phosphorus coupling
is seen for the meta-carbon on the phenyl ring for 4 where a
doublet of doublets is seen, this is absent for the free ligand 5
where only a doublet is observed.
In conclusion we have developed a new, facile route to P–Cl
bond formation for coordinated secondary phosphines. This
simple transformation allows for alternative routes to function-
alised macrocycles. One of these routes, notably aryl/alkylation
using organocopper reagents, offers the possibility of intro-
ducing a broad range of substituents due to the extensive range
of organocopper reagents available and including options for
which alternative methods have failed. The chemistry of these
new ligands is currently being examined and this new class of
triaryl-substituted 1,5,9-triphosphacyclododecanes should
also allow a more extensive examination of structure/reactivity
relationships in their metal complexes. This study is currently
under investigation.
4 Y. A. Veits, E. G. Neganova, M. V. Filippov, A. A. Borisenko and
V. L. Foss, J. Gen. Chem. USSR (Engl. Transl.), 1961, 61, 114;
Y. A. Veits, E. G. Neganova, M. V. Filippova, A. A. Borisenko and
V. L. Foss, Zh. Obshch. Khim., 1991, 61, 130.
5 G. M. Sheldrick, SHELXS-94, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. A, 1990, 46,
467; G. M. Sheldrick, SHELXL-97, Program for the refinement of
Crystal Structures, Universität Göttingen, 1997; L. Zsolnai and
G. Huttner, ZORTEP, Universität Heidelberg, 1994; L. Guoguang,
PATTERN, Program for Drawing Diffraction Patterns, Karolinska
Institute, 1994.
Communication 9/00509I
1046
J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1999, 1045–1046