Aldol Additions of Ketone Trichlorosilyl Enolates
Another significant influence on the rate of reaction was the
effect of salt additives. As discussed previously, Bu4N+OTf-
accelerated the addition of 4 to 5a in the presence of 7j. This
was interpreted as stabilization of ionic intermediates on the
mechanistic pathway arising from the enhanced ionic strength
of the medium. Furthermore, the decrease in rate from the
addition of Bu4N+Cl- suggests not only the intermediacy of
ionic intermediates but also that cationic siliconates arise from
the ionization of chloride. The common ion effect certainly
implicates chloride as a key participant in the aldol addition of
trichlorosilyl enolates to aldehydes and also explains the low
reactivity of aliphatic aldehydes by chlorosilyl ether formation.8
The use of geometrically defined enolates such as 4 and (Z)-9
allows for additional mechanistic insights based on the resulting
stereochemical outcomes. The stereochemical correlation shows
that the addition proceeds through a closed transition structure
centered around a siliconium ion. This stems from the observa-
tion that a switch in syn-anti manifolds occurs when employing
either 4 or (Z)-9 in aldol additions using similar phosphoramides.
The switch in diastereoselectivity can best be explained from
configurational correlation via aldol additions through closed
transition structures.35 In the case of enolate 4, this would imply
addition through a boatlike transition structure to give syn aldol
products in the presence of catalysts such as 7j (diphenylstil-
bene-1,2-diamine). Likewise, anti products would arise from
additions through a chairlike transition structure from catalysts
similar to 7a (dimethylstilbene-1,2-diamine).
Together with kinetic studies, the stereochemical information
from the addition of geometrically defined enolates allows a
clearer mechanistic picture to emerge. For phosphoramide 7j,
kinetic and nonlinear effect studies revealed that a single
phosphoramide is present in the transition structure for the
stereochemical-determining step. Because this phosphoramide
affords syn products from E-enolates, it follows that 7j acts in
a 1:1 manner with trichlorosilyl enolates to afford aldol products
through a boatlike transition structure. As is the case for other
syn-selective phosphoramides such as 7k and 7p, steric bulk
proximal to the coordinating oxygen limits complexation to a
1:1 mode with aldolization proceeding through a boatlike
transition structure.11a
amounts of the anti product. Moreover, the observation that slow
addition of the aldehyde leads to enhanced anti diastereoselec-
tivity from the reaction of 4 with 5a in the presence of 7a
demonstrates that by maintaining a relatively high concentration
of catalyst with respect to available substrates, aldol addition
proceeds predominantly by a 2:1 pathway, through a chairlike
transition structure.
The preference for the 1:1 or 2:1 (phosphoramide/silicon)
complexes to adopt either boatlike or chairlike transition
structures is likely controlled by the nature of the two different
silicon complexes. As in the unpromoted pathway, the 1:1
manifold involves five ligands positioned in a trigonal bipyra-
midal manner around the now cationic silicon center (Figure
13). As before, the components must be proximal for reaction
to occur and it is likely that in the more stable complexes, the
aldehyde occupies one of the apical positions and either the
phosphoramide or one of the chlorides in the other. On the basis
of X-ray crystallographic studies of five-coordinate silicon36 and
tin complexes,11a,37 we suspect that the phosphoramide occupies
the apical position, leaving the enol ether and the two chlorides
to orient along the basal plane. This positions the enolate and
phosphoramide in relatively close proximity to the aldehyde,
iv. A more reactive complex would arise from a Berry pseudo-
rotation that interchanges the enolate and aldehyde moieties,
v.30 In either of these complexes, the preference for the boat
geometry is rooted in the small bond angle at silicon (90°) and
the placement of the hydrogens on both the aldehyde carbonyl
group and the E-enolate toward the chlorine atom. In any
chairlike arrangement, either the aldehyde residue or the enolate
spectator group will experience unfavorable steric interactions.
For the less bulky phosphoramide 7a, kinetic and nonlinear
effect studies revealed the aldol additions were second order in
catalyst, clearly implicating a transition structure containing two
phosphoramides for the stereochemistry determining step in the
aldol addition. Additionally, the stereochemical consequences
would dictate that aldol addition through this 2:1 (phosphor-
amide/silicon) pathway proceeds via a chairlike structure to
afford anti products from enolate 4. Indeed, unlike the more
sterically congested catalysts, phosphoramides bearing small
substituents on the internal nitrogens are able to achieve 2:1
complexation.11a This divergence in mechanism is further
highlighted by the remarkable loading effect observed for the
diastereoselectivity of aldol additions in the presence 11c. At
low catalyst loadings where 1:1 complexation is most likely,
the reactions are highly syn selective with enolate 4 and catalyst
11c. Increasing the amount of phosphoramide up to 2.0 equiv
allows the 2:1 pathway to become competitive, affording greater
FIGURE 13. Isomeric 1:1 cationic complexes.
In the 2:1 pathway, the cationic siliconate must now adopt
an octahedral geometry to accommodate the additional phos-
phoramide ligand. Although multiple isomeric complexes are
possible, the aldehyde and enolate must be bound in a
cis-manner for reaction to take place (Figure 14). This factor
reduces the number of geometrically isomeric complexes to
four: three with cis-configured phosphoramides (vi-viii) and
one with trans-configured groups (ix).38 Although we are unable
to unequivocally identify which or how many of these com-
plexes contribute to the overall reaction flux, several factors
allow qualitative conclusions. First, given the high enantiose-
lectivity observed with 7a it is unlikely that multiple complexes
(36) Reviews on hypercoordinate silicon compounds: (a) Kost, D.;
Kalikhman, I. In The Chemistry of Organic Silicon Compounds; Rappoport,
Z., Apeloig, Y., Eds.; Wiley: Chichester, 1998; Vol. 2, Part 2. (b) Holmes,
R. R. Chem. ReV. 1996, 96, 927-950. (c) Chuit, C.; Corriu, R. J. P.; Reye,
C.; Young, J. C. Chem. ReV. 1993, 93, 1371-1448. (d) Tandura, S. N.;
Voronkov, M. G.; Alekseev, N. V. Top. Curr. Chem. 1986, 131, 99-189.
(37) Aslanov, L. A.; Attiya, V. M.; Ionov, V. M.; Permin, A. B.;
Petrosyan, V. S. Zh. Strukt. Khim. 1977, 18, 1113-1118.
(35) (a) Evans, D. A.; Nelson, J. V.; Taber, T. R. In Topics in
Stereochemistry; Eliel, E. L., Wilen, S. H., Eds.; Wiley-Interscience: New
York, 1982; Vol. 13, Chapter 1. (b) Braun, M. In StereoselectiVe Synthesis,
Methods of Organic Chemistry (Houben-Weyl), E21 ed.; Helmchen, G.,
Hoffman, R., Mulzer, J., Schaumann, E., Eds.; Thieme: Stuttgart, 1996;
Vol. 3; pp 1603-1612.
(38) Complexes vi and vii also exist as two limiting diastereomeric chair
complexes, but will not be considered at this level of analysis.
J. Org. Chem, Vol. 71, No. 10, 2006 3919