(
)
N. Legay-Sommaire, F. LegayrChemical Physics Letters 314 1999 40–46
45
qHq. In the case of 193 nm irradiation without
w
x
mercury 16 , the reaction involves two argon atoms
of the matrix and produces ClHCly and ArHArq.
Here we do not observe Ar2 Hq; hence either Ar2 Hq
dissociates under KrF irradiation in the presence of
mercury or Hq is involved in another reaction, with
mercury or HCl. The HClHq ion could be produced
from a HCl trimer, but the IR absorption of this ion
w
x
is already known 12 and is not observed here.
w
x
Lundell 18 estimates the energy necessary to
break the Ar2 Hq ion by the reaction: Ar2 Hq
ArHqqAr as 107–126 kJrmol, and Fridgen et al.
™
w
x
21 who also use a DFT calculation estimate to 69
kJrmol. The KrF laser may produce this dissocia-
tion; in this case, instead of finding Ar2 Hq, we must
find the absorption of the ArHq ion lying around
Fig. 5. Spectra at 6 K of the ClHCly and Kr2 Hq ions after KrF
. Ž .
Ž
.
Ž
10 mJ irradiation of HClrHgrKr 1:;0.1:100 : a KrF irradia-
2700 cmy1 19 . However, this is not the case and,
to our knowledge, ArHq has never been observed in
Ar matrices. Moreover, in the case of Kr2 Hq, we
observe dissociation by KrF laser irradiation at 20 K,
but no new lines are found after this dissociation,
leading to the conclusion that it dissociates into three
atoms. This seems energetically possible because
w
x
Ž .
tion at 6 K 11000 shots, b further 25 K irradiation 2700 shots. X
may be HgH?.
that these lines are observed, only in high concentra-
q
Ž
.
tion experiments 1% , where the Ar2 H lines are
absent.
What species are responsible for the small lines
observed in the 1115–1140 cmy1 region? This spec-
trum is correlated with an observation of the radicals
and thus is not observed in the nitrogen matrix. We
can rule out the HgHq molecule which is already
known and its frequency is in the 1950 cmy1 region.
It should not be due to a species containing Ar or Kr
because the shift between the group of lines in Ar
and Kr matrices is too small. From their frequency
difference and their relative intensities, we can tell
that these lines do not correspond to different Cl
isotopes, but a shift is not seen for all the vibrations
adding the KrHq dissociation energy ca. 380
Ž
q
kJrmol to the Kr2 H dissociation energy in KrHq
.
Ž
w
x
w x.
qKr 114 18 or 77 kJrmol 21 , one obtains,
respectively, 41 300 and 38 200 cmy1 compared to
y1
Ž
.
the KrF laser photon 40 300 cm . In the argon
matrix, Ar2 Hq is observed in small quantities and
only in diluted experiments, perhaps entirely dissoci-
ated by the laser; in this case, the dissociation energy
w
x
w x
calculated from Refs. 18 or 21 is always lower
than the laser photon! In their study of the photogen-
eration of ionic species in rare-gas matrices doped
Ž
w
x
of the Cl containing molecules for example n3 of
with HCl, Kunttu et al. 22 showed that thermal
ClHCly ; thus a molecule containing Cl cannot be
q
.
Ž
.
bleaching of the cation ArHAr absorption occurs
at temperatures as low as 12 K and that the kinetics
of this reaction, seen from their results, shows that
thermal bleaching is not fast enough to explain why
we see such a small absorption of the Ar2 Hq ion at
6 K.
completely ruled out. Nevertheless, the best candi-
date for these lines seems to be the HgH molecule,
but we are not sure of this assignment because there
is a strong shift towards low frequencies, compared
y1
Ž
w
x.
to the gas phase 1203 cm
17 . Such a large shift
Ž
between the gas and matrix has never been observed;
the highest shift is around 37 cmy1 for HgH2 in a
nitrogen matrix, due to a vacancy close to the
However, one problem remains: why, if true see
.
previous discussion , do we observe HgH and not
HgHq in the rare-gas matrices? Lundell and Kunttu
w x
w
x
molecule 3 .
19 in the discussion of their theoretical calculations
We assume that formation of the ClHCly ion is
found that the dissociation of Kr2 Hq into its looser
q
form Kr PPP KrH
H S , but that for Ar2 H , on the contrary, the
gives preferentially Krq2 q
Ž
.
produced by the mercury-sensitized two-photon dis-
sociation of the HCl dimer: HCl qhn ™ ClHCl
y
Ž2
.
q
Ž
.
2