In organic solvents (e.g., methanol) or in a neutral
aqueous medium, 1 was fairly stable to a broad range of
chemical and enzymatic oxidants, including potassium
ferricyanide, hydrogen peroxide, or, notably, peroxidase/
H2O2, remaining virtually unchanged over prolonged
periods of time up to several days.
The mechanism by which H2O2 mediates conversion of 1
to 3 under acid conditions was then investigated. Figure 1
shows the spectrophotometric course of the oxidation of 1
with acidic H2O2 (left panel) leading to formation of the
green chromophore. Data showed the relatively fast con-
version of 1 to the final product following the addition of
acid. The chromophore of dimers 2 was closely similar to
that of 1. The conversion of dimers 2a/b to 3 was therefore
separately followed (right panel). The pseudo-first-order
rate constant of 0.089 ( 0.005 minꢀ1 was determined with
1 at 50 μM and H2O2 at 500 μM based on the formation of
3 at 598 nm and decay of 2 at 320 nm (SI). Oxygen proved
Remarkably, however, exposure of 1 to H2O2 in a
strongly acidic medium (i.e., methanol/conc aq HCl 3:1
at room temperature) resulted in a fast and efficient
reaction leading to a stable blue-green chromophore
(λmax 598 nm) in a few minutes. In the absence of H2O2,
no detectable chromophore formation was observed over
the time scale of 1 h. HPLC analysisofthe reaction mixture
revealed the very rapid accumulation in the initial stages of
the reaction of colorless intermediates that were eventually
converted to the green chromophore, with no other
detectable intermediate/reaction product (see Support-
ing Information (SI)). This was also confirmed by
proton NMR monitoring of the reaction course (SI).
Workup of the mixtures allowed isolation and spectral
characterization of the colorless intermediates as the
meso/DL pair of diastereoisomers of the single-bonded
dimers 2a/b which were amply investigated by compu-
tational analysis (SI), whereas the chromophoric spe-
0
cies proved to be a mixture of Δ2,2 -bi(3-phenyl-2H-1,4-
benzothiazine) Z/E isomers 3a/b (Scheme 1) in an
approximate ratio of 3:1 (SI).
Assignment of the Z-configuration to the major compo-
nent of the mixture (3a) was made possible by comparison
of the experimental and computed 1H NMR spectra (SI).
For the mixture of isomeric 3, an overall ε598 = 5700 (
45 Mꢀ1 cmꢀ1 in methanol/36% HCl 3:1 v/v was determined,
which suggested a potential application for colorimetric
determination of H2O2.
Figure 1. Monitoring of chromophore formation by oxidation
of 1(left) and dimers 2(right) at50μM in air-equilibrated methanol/
36% HCl 3:1 v/v solutions by 500 μM H2O2 at 5 min intervals
over 30 min.
to be critical for chromophore formation from both 1 and
2a/b since no significant reaction occurred under an argon
atmosphere.
In another series of experiments, the ability of a series of
acid-compatible oxidants to bring about conversion of 1 to
3 was investigated. Besides H2O2, other peroxides such as
t-BuOOH, m-chloroperbenzoic acid (MCPBA), and ben-
zoyl peroxide also induced acid-dependent chromophore
formation, whereas persulfate at the same concentration
proved ineffective.
Scheme 1. Structures of Dimeric Oxidation Products of 1
In a screening aimed at identifying other oxidants cap-
able of promoting the oxidative coupling reaction, it was
found that some redox-active transition metal ions (e.g.,
Fe(III), V(V), and Cu(II)) were also able to generate the
chromophore (Figure 2), whereas Fe(II) was inactive even
in the presence of peroxides (i.e., under Fenton-type con-
ditions, both at neutral and acidic pH; see also Figure 2).
A possible mechanism accounting for the reported ob-
servations is given in Scheme 2. In this scheme, peroxides
or metal ions induce conversion of protonated 1 to the
resonance-stabilized benzothiazinyl radical 1. This conver-
sion may be the result of two alternative, not mutually
exclusive, routes, that is, direct H-atom abstraction and
electron transfer with concomitant/sequential proton
transfer. The former path is likely to be mediated mainly
(2) (a) Napolitano, A.; Panzella, L.; Leone, L.; d’Ischia, M. Acc.
Chem. Res. 2013, 46, 519. (b) Leone, L.; Crescenzi, O.; Napolitano, A.;
Barone, V.; d’Ischia, M. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 2012, 5136. (c) Becker,
R. S.; Natarajan, L. V. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1986, 132, 141. (d) Ciminale,
F.; Liso, G.; Trapani, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1981, 22, 1455.
(3) (a) Santacroce, C.; Sica, D.; Nicolaus, R. A. Gazz. Chim. Ital.
1968, 98, 85. (b) Prota, G.; Giordano, F.; Mazzarella, L.; Santacroce, C.;
Sica, D. J. Chem. Soc. C 1971, 15, 2610.
B
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX