Aldehyde 4 was synthesized starting from the readily
available chiral aldehyde 615 (Scheme 1). A Wittig reaction
of 6 with Ph3PdCMeCO2Et provided the targeted (E)-enoate
in 85% yield following chromatographic separation of the
minor Z isomer (97:3 selectivity). Reduction of the (E)-enoate
with DIBAL then provided 7 in 83% yield from 6.16
Diastereoselective epoxidation of 7 was performed using the
Sharpless asymmetric epoxidation,17 and the resulting epoxy
alcohol was oxidized to the aldehyde 8 in 65% overall yield
by using the Parikh-Doering procedure.18 Epoxyaldehyde
8 was elaborated to the homoallylic alcohol 10 via aldol
reaction with the chiral crotonate imide 9,19 protection of
the aldol product as a TBS ether, and then reduction of the
acyl oxazolidinone using LiBH4 (5 equiv) in THF containing
3 equiv of H2O.20 Acylation of the primary hydroxyl group
of 10 followed by oxidative cleavage of the terminal olefin
and asymmetric crotylboration21 of the resulting aldehyde
provided 12 with excellent stereoselectivity. Finally, protec-
tion of the C(15) alcohol as a TES ether followed by
oxidative cleavage of the olefin completed the synthesis of
4.
Figure 1. Retrosynthetic analysis.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of Chiral Aldehyde 4
expected to be relatively modest,13 should reinforce that of
4 in a matched double asymmetric14 fragment coupling
process using the lithium enolate of 5. However, we also
recognized that successful implementation of this strategy
would be dependent on two critical issues. The first was
whether the potentially sensitive C(10) stereocenter of â,γ-
unsaturated ketone 5 would survive the planned aldol
coupling. The second concerned the definition of a suitable
protecting group strategy for the C(15) hydroxyl group, since
our earlier studies indicated that this unit would have a
pronounced effect on the aldol reaction stereoselectivity.12
While a C(15)-OTES ether was deemed appropriate for late-
stage manipulations in our projected total synthesis, our
earlier studies suggested that a â-TES ether would not be
suitable for the proposed fragment assembly sequence.
Fortunately, as described herein, the aldol reaction of 4 and
5 proved to be a highly stereoselective and synthetically
useful transformation.
(13) For example, the chiral methyl ketones employed in the studies
summarized in refs 10 and 11, which are more structurally complex than 5
in the present work, exhibited diastereofacial preferences ranging from 60:
40 to 83:17, depending on the metal enolate employed (see footnote 10 in
ref 11).
(14) Masamune, S.; Choy, W.; Petersen, J. S.; Sita, L. R. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. Engl. 1985, 24, 1.
The diastereofacial selectivity of 4 and the related alde-
hydes 13a and 13b was probed by studying their aldol
reactions with enolates generated from methyl isopropyl
ketone (3-methyl-2-butanone; Table 1 and Figure 2). The
results of these reactions demonstrate once again that the
(15) Walkup, R. D.; Kane, R. R.; Boatman, P. D., Jr.; Cunningham, R.
T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 52, 7587.
(16) The spectroscopic and physical properties (e.g., 1H NMR, IR, mass
spectrum and/or C,H analysis) of all new compounds were fully consistent
with the assigned structures.
(17) Katsuki, T.; Martin, V. S. Org. React. 1996, 48, 1.
(18) Parikh, J. R.; von Doering, E. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89, 5505.
(19) Evans, D. A.; Sjogren, E. B.; Bartroli, J.; Dow, R. L. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1986, 27, 4957.
(20) Pfenning, T. D.; Djuric, S. W.; Haack, R. A.; Kalish, V. J.;
Miyashiro, J. M.; Rowell, B. W.; Yu, S. S. Synth. Commun. 1990, 20, 307.
(21) Roush, W. R.; Palkowitz, A. D.; Ando, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990,
112, 6348.
(22) Rychnovsky, S. D.; Rogers, B.; Yang, G. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58,
3511.
(23) The stereochemistry of all other aldols was assigned via analysis
of the characteristic ABX pattern for the C(12)-CH2 and C(13)-H
resonances, as previously described (see footnote 8 of ref 10).
96
Org. Lett., Vol. 1, No. 1, 1999