5218
J . Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 5218-5223
Tr a n sition Str u ctu r e Geom etr ies for Tr a n sfer s of Neu tr a l a n d
An ion ic Nitr ogen to Lith ia ted Ca r ba n ion s
Peter Beak,* Kathryn Conser Basu, and J ames J . Li
Department of Chemistry, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801
Received March 23, 1999
The geometries of nucleophilic substitutions at neutral and anionic nitrogen by organolithium species
have been investigated. The demonstration of an intramolecular conversion of 9 to 10 provides an
endocyclic restriction test which supports a trigonal bipyramidal transition structure for nitrogen
transfer. A lack of isotopic scrambling of 12a -18O during nitrogen transfer is taken to rule out
reaction via an oriented ion pair. Attempted endocyclic restriction tests for transfers of formally
anionic nitrogen with 32 and 33 were not successful. Reactions of n-butyl, s-butyl and tert-
butyllithium reagents with 16, 23, 30, 31, and 36-38 generally afford higher yields with increasing
substitution at the carbon of the organolithium reagent and with decreasing substitution adjacent
to the nitrogen of the aminating reagent. These results are consistent with trigonal bipyramidal
transition states for nucleophilic displacements of oxygen by carbon at neutral and anionic nitrogen.
In tr od u ction
classic SN2 substitution. An alternative pathway could
involve initial bond cleavage to generate an intermediate,
shown as the nitrenum ion,4 which would react with a
nucleophile in a second step. If the aminating reagent
was an alkoxyamide anion, the concerted pathway would
involve nucleophilic attack at a formally negative nitro-
gen while the stepwise process would proceed via a formal
nitrenoid.
Kinetic evidence has been interpreted to favor con-
certed pathway for most aminations.3 However kinetic
data support a stepwise pathway for reactions in which
an intermediate nitrenium ion can be stabilized by an
aromatic ring.5 The difference between the restricted
geometry required by a trigonal bipyramidal transition
structure, and the less constrained geometry of a dis-
sociative pathway has been probed for aminations of
lithiated carbanions by the endocyclic restriction test.6
Those experiments revealed that displacements at both
neutral and anionic nitrogen in small and medium-sized
rings are intermolecular, consistent with the classic SN2
pathway.7 Theoretical calculations are also consistent
with this interpretation.2
Aminative processes which can be represented as
nucleophilic displacements at nitrogen are reactions of
mechanistic, synthetic, biochemical, and theoretical
interest.1-4 The limiting mechanisms for transfer of
nitrogen from bonding to a leaving group to bonding to a
first row nucleophile are illustrated by the conversion of
1 to 2. In the concerted pathway bond making and bond
breaking would occur simultaneously via 3. This transi-
tion structure is shown as the trigonal bipyramid of a
We now report investigations of transfers of nitrogen
from oxygen to carbanions which could take place within
large endocyclic rings. We also report studies of the effect
of substitution on these nucleophilic displacements.
(1) For reviews of electrophilic aminating reagents, see: Boche, G.
Houben-Weyl, Methods of Organic Chemistry, Vol. E21e; Helmchen,
G., Hoffmann, R. W., Mulzer, J ., Eds.; Schauman, Thieme: Stuttgart,
1995; p 5133. Erdik, E.; Ay, M. Chem. Rev. 1989, 89, 1947. Mulzer, J .;
Altenbach, H.-J .; Braun, M.; Krohn, K.; Reissig, H.-U. Organic
Synthesis Highlights: VCH Publishers: Weinheim, 1991; p 45. Greck,
C.; Geneˆt, J . P. Syn. Lett. 1977, 741.
Resu lts a n d Discu ssion
Rea ction s a t Neu tr a l Nitr ogen . En d ocyclic Re-
str iction Test in a La r ge Rin g. We have previously
(2) McKee, J . J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 859. Armstrong, D. R.;
Snaith, R.; Walker, G. T. J . Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1985, 789.
Boche, G.; Wagner, H.-U. J . Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1984, 1591.
Cramer, C. J .; Dulles, F. J .; Falvey, D. E. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1994,
116, 9787. Bu¨hl, M.; Schaefer, H. F., III J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115,
9143. Bu¨hl, M.; Schaefer, H. F., III J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 364.
Glukhovtseu, M. N.; Pross, A.; Radam, L.; J . Am. Chem. Soc., 1995,
117, 9012.
(3) Helmick, J . S.; Martin, K. A.; Heinrich, J . L.; Novak, M. J . Am.
Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 3549. Ulbrich, R.; Famulok, M.; Bosold, F.;
Boche, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31, 1689. Campbell, J . J .; Glover,
S. A. J . Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1992, 1661.
(5) Novak, M.; Kennedy, S. A. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 574.
Davidse, P. A.; Kahley, M. J .; McClelland, R. A.; Novak, M. J . Am.
Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 4513. Novak, M.; Kahley, M. J .; Lin, J .; Kennedy,
S. A.; Swanegan, L. A. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 11626. Defrancq,
E.; Pelloux, N.; Leterne, A.; Lhomme, M.-F.; Lhomme, J . J . Org. Chem.
1991, 56, 4817. Robbins, R. J .; Laman, D. M.; Falvey, D. E. J . Am.
Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 8127.
(6) For a review of the endocyclic restriction test, see: Beak, P. Acc.
Chem. Res. 1992, 25, 215.
(7) (a) Beak, P.; Basha, A.; Kokko, B. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106,
1511. (b) Beak, P.; Basha, A.; Kokko, B. J .; Loo, D. J . Am. Chem. Soc.
1986, 108, 6016. (c) Beak, P.; Selling, G. W. J . Org. Chem. 1989, 54,
5574. (d) Beak, P.; Li, J . J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 2796.
(4) For discussions of aminations related to carcinogenesis, see:
Singer, B.; Kusmierek, J . T. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1982, 51, 655. Lai,
C. C.; Miller, E. C.; Miller, J . A.; Leim, A. Carcinogenesis 1987, 8, 471.
10.1021/jo990509g CCC: $18.00 © 1999 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 06/24/1999