Organic Letters
Letter
substrates with groups such as 4-methoxy (4) and 4-alkyl (5, 6,
8, and 9). Meanwhile, electron-withdrawing substituents,
including 4-fluoro (11) and 4-chloro (12) groups, were
tolerated. It is also important to mention that substrates with a
strong electron-withdrawing group such as a cyano or nitro
group failed to give the desired products under our conditions.
Additionally, meta-substituted phenols provided two products
with the 4-substituted product as the main product (13, 14),
probably due to the influence of steric hindrance. Furthermore,
as shown for 15−18, the reaction was not hampered by the
presence of ortho-substituents.
Scheme 3. Proposed Mechanism
To gain some more mechanistic insight into the reaction
pathway, several control experiments were conducted (Scheme
2). Under the optimized conditions, 3 could not be converted
Scheme 2. Mechanistic Studies
and phenol to provide D. Finally, the aryl rhodium complex D
undergoes reductive elimination to produce the final ester
product 2 and, meanwhile, releases the Rh complex which will
be regenerated to give the active rhodium complex A under the
assistance of TEMPO17 and ready for the next catalytic cycle.
In conclusion, we have developed a rhodium-catalyzed
selective carbonylation of phenols. This catalytic system allows
the direct carbonylative conversion of various phenols to o-
hydroxyaryl esters. The control experiments and the
deuterated experiments suggest the reactions have undergone
a 1,3-rhodium migration process, which can be controlled by
the ligand.
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
* Supporting Information
■
sı
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at
General comments, general procedure, mechanistic
studies, analytic data, and NMR spectra of products
into the ester 2 (Scheme 2A); meanwhile, 2 could not be
converted into 3 with DPPP as the ligand (Scheme 2B),
indicating that under this catalytic system products 2 and 3
were not rearranged into each other. In order to get more
evidence, deuterated experiments were conducted. 2-d1 was
not detected when 1-d1 was used as the substrate; rather, 65%
yield of 2 could be obtained (Scheme 2C). Thus, we
preliminarily proved our assumption about the 1,3-Rh
migration. Subsequently, kinetic isotope effect (KIE) experi-
ments were conducted by employing 1, 1-d1, and 1-d6. As
shown in Scheme 2D and 2E, the KIEs (kH/kD) were equal to
2.6 and 2.2, suggesting the ligand exchange step and the 1,3-Rh
migration process might be the rate-determining steps.
However, the fact that H/D on phenols (ArOH) exchanges
easily must be considered as well.
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Corresponding Author
■
Xiao-Feng Wu − Leibniz-Institut fur Katalyse e. V. an der
̈
̈
Universitat Rostock, 18059 Rostock, Germany; Dalian National
Laboratory for Clean Energy, Dalian Institute of Chemical
Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 116023 Dalian, Liaoning,
Authors
Han-Jun Ai − Leibniz-Institut fu
̈
r Katalyse e. V. an der
Universitat Rostock, 18059 Rostock, Germany
Youcan Zhang − Leibniz-Institut fur Katalyse e. V. an der
Universitat Rostock, 18059 Rostock, Germany
r Katalyse e. V. an der
̈
̈
̈
Based on the above results and previous reports,14,16
a
Fengqian Zhao − Leibniz-Institut fu
̈
plausible mechanism is proposed (Scheme 3). The reaction
starts with ligand exchange of phenol to rhodium complex A.
The resulting key intermediate B undergoes a 1,3-rhodium
migration process to provide C when DCPE is used as the
ligand. Interestingly, B is prone to the CO insertion step and at
the end gives product 3 when employing DPPP as the ligand.
On the other side, the aryl rhodium complex C reacts with CO
̈
Universitat Rostock, 18059 Rostock, Germany
Complete contact information is available at:
Notes
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
C
Org. Lett. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX