H.C.E. McFarlane, W. McFarlane / Polyhedron 18 (1999) 2117–2127
2123
Table 7
31P NMR parameters of derivatives of 1,2,4,5-tetrakis-(diphenylphosphino)benzene
No
Compound
d(31P1)a
d(31P2)a
d(31P4)a
d(31P5)a
3J(31P1 –31P2)b
3J(31P4 –31P5)b
7
7
214.2
43.2
42.8
42.8
45.0
46.0
33.7
34.6
33.3
35.6
36.2
22.1
23.3
82.7
83.4
60.0
59.7
45.0
44.0
61.0
38.4
214.2
218.5
219.7
219.7
45.0
214.2
213.5
42.8
219.7
42.2
46.0
213.4
34.6
214.2
213.5
219.7
42.8
219.3
46.0
213.6
220.1
33.3
219.6
36.2
214.0
23.3
213.8
83.4
213.9
59.7
214.4
44.0
–
29.3
29.3
29.3
–
–
–
29.3
29.3
25.4
–
7a
7b
7c
7d
7e
7f
7g
7h
7i
7 h1-Sj
7 h1,4-S2jc
7 h1,5-S2jc
7 h1,2,4-S3j
7 h1,2,4,5-S4j
46.0
–
7 h1-Sejd
219.3
220.1
219.3
35.6
35.4
34.2
33.3
–
–
7 h1,4-Se2jc
34.2
32.2
31.7
–
22.0
18.0
–
–
–
–
–
7 h1,5-Se2jc
219.3
33.6
36.2
7 h1,2,4-Se3j
7j
7k
7l
7 h1,2,4,5-Se4je
7 h1,4-(MeI)2jc
7 h1,5-(MeI)2jc
7 h1,2-Cr(CO)4j
7 h1,2-Cr(CO)4, 4,5-Cr(CO)4j
7 h1,2-Mo(CO)4j
7 h1,2-Mo(CO)4, 4,5-Mo(CO)4j
7 h1,2-W(CO)4jf
7 h1,2-W(CO)4, 4,5-W(CO)4jg
7 h1,2-PdCl2, 4,5-PdCl2jh
7 h1,2-PtCl2, 4,5-PtCl2ji
36.2
–
214.0
213.3
82.7
83.4
60.0
59.7
45.0
44.0
61.0
22.1
22.0
18.0
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
213.3
213.8
83.4
213.9
59.7
214.4
44.0
61.0
7m
7n
7o
7p
7q
7r
7s
7t
–
–
–
61.0
38.4
38.4
38.4
–
a In ppm 60.2 ppm.
b In Hz 60.2 Hz. The absence of an entry indicates that the coupling constant is unavailable owing to symmetry or accidental isochronicity.
c It may be necessary to interchange the relative assignments of 7b and 7c, 7g and 7h, and 7k and 7l.
d
1J(77Se –31P1)5742 Hz.
e
1J(77Se–31P)5766 Hz.
f
1J(183W–31P)5234 Hz.
g
1J(183W–31P)5238 Hz.
h
1J(195Pt–31P)53620 Hz.
i
1J(195Pt–31P)53618 Hz.
widely separated groups being much less important. This is
supported by the observation that the data for derivatives
of 4 (Table 4) and the isolated Ph2P groups of 3 (Table 3)
and 6 (Table 6) are all very similar to those of the
corresponding derivatives of triphenylphosphine itself.
Similarly, the isolated Ph2PCCPPh2 fragments in 1, 3, and
7, show closely parallel behaviour to each other. Thus
mono-sulfurisation increases d(31P) by approximately 57
ppm (cf. 48 ppm for Ph3P [15]) and disulfurisation of
adjacent Ph2P groups by approximately 61 ppm, these
larger figures being indicative of a significant steric effect.
The corresponding figures for mono- and di-selenisation
and quaternization with MeI are also greater at 48, 52 and
39 ppm respectively compared with 40, 40, and 27 ppm for
isolated Ph2P groups. The M(CO)4 [M5Mo, W]
derivatives of chelating 1 have been referred to previously
[16–18], but apparently not fully characterised and the
coordination chemical shifts (i.e. the changes in d(31P)
accompanying their formation) of 96.6, 73.1, and 59.8 ppm
for M5Cr, Mo, and W respectively are all some 6 ppm
greater than for the corresponding complexes of dppe
which also gives a five-membered chelate ring. This
perhaps implies a greater degree of ‘‘ring strain’’ in the
former, and it is noteworthy that its greater conformational
mobility permits dppe to achieve a smaller angle of bite
than 1. However, measurements of heats of formation from
norbornadieneMo(CO)4 [16] suggest that 1m and
dppeMo(CO)4 are of comparable stability. Similar remarks
apply to the five-membered chelate rings in the M(CO)4,
PdCl2 and PtCl2 complexes of 3 and 7. The foregoing
additions also have minor effects upon the chemical
shift(s) of the non-reacting Ph2P group(s). Thus sulfurisa-
tion in an ortho position reduces d(31P) of the unreacted
Ph2P group by approximately 4 ppm and selenisation has a
somewhat larger effect, while quaternisation leads to small
increases. The additional strain that might be expected to
be present in derivatives of 2 and 6 with three adjacent
Ph2P groups has little further effect upon d(31P), and
indeed this generally also applies to the severely hindered
5.
4.2. Phosphorus–phosphorus coupling
In the parent polyphosphines 3J(31PIII–31PIII) is large
and varies considerably with steric factors but nonetheless
has considerable diagnostic value. As expected, 4J(31PIII–
31PIII) and 5J(31PIII–31PIII) are much smaller and any
steric dependence is not readily apparent. In the derivatives
this also applies to the four and five bond coupling
constants but not always to the three-bond couplings. In
3
general terms it can be stated that J(31PV–31PV) is always
less than 11 Hz, the only apparent exceptions to this being