O
O
product and that the side chain epoxide was trans, they did not
establish the stereochemistry of the side chain relative to the
lactam entity. In their paper, pramanicin was depicted (arbi-
trarily) as ent-7. This work clearly establishes the relative
stereochemistry to be as in isomer 9. However, the optical
i
ii,iii
2
NBoc
NH
PhMe2Si
PhMe2Si
OTBDMS
OH
25
rotation of isomer 9 ([a]D +28.8, c 0.21 in MeOH) is of
11
10
25
opposite sign to that reported for authentic pramanicin ([a]D
Scheme 2 Reagents and conditions: i, PhMe2SiLi, Et2Zn, THF, 278 °C,
99%; ii, TBAF, THF, 80%; iii, TFA, CH2Cl2, 85%.
231.5, c 0.21 in MeOH) and thus indicates the absolute
stereochemistry of pramanicin to be that of 1.∑
We thank Dr R. E. Schwartz at the Merck Research
Laboratories for the generous donation of authentic pramanicin,
GlaxoWellcome Research Ltd. for the endowment (to A. G. M.
B.), the Wolfson Foundation for establishing the Wolfson
Centre for Organic Chemistry in Medical Science at Imperial
College, the Royal Society for a Dorothy Hodgkin Fellowship
(to M. L. S.), Celltech Therapeutics for their financial support
(to N. S. S.) and the EPSRC.
ing its purification. Therefore immediate oxidation of the
diketone unit with dimethyldioxirane and a nickel(II) acet-
ylacetonate6 catalyst gave hydroxy dione 6 as a single
diastereoisomer in excellent overall yield (60%). The ethoxy-
(diphenyl)silyl group blocked the top face of the diketone
directing reaction to the opposite face and thus setting the
configuration of the tertiary alcohol as required. Tamao
oxidation of silane 6 proceeded smoothly at low temperature
with MCPBA as oxidant to produce the secondary alcohol with
retention of configuration as desired. The use of peracetic acid
or hydrogen peroxide as alternative oxidants gave only
intractable mixtures of products. Removal of the Boc group via
thermolysis on silica under vacuum7 followed by deprotection
of the TBDMS moiety using fluorosilicic acid8 furnished
compound 7 (Scheme 1). Comparison of 7 with authentic
pramanicin by NMR analysis revealed very slight differences in
the chemical shift of the protons associated with the alkene and
the epoxide ring system. Alternatively, synthesis of diastereo-
isomer 8 using ent-3 as the enolate quench (62%) and
elaboration as before yielded isomer 9. This diastereoisomer 9
was identical by 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopy with authentic
pramanicin (see Fig. 1). Whilst the Merck group1 established
the relative stereochemistry of the g-lactam ring of the natural
Notes and references
† Harrison and co-workers have also published a biomimetic synthesis of
the fatty acid side chain of pramanicin in racemic form; see ref. 3.
‡ Aldehyde 3 was prepared from (E)-dodec-2-enol via Sharpless asym-
metric epoxidation, oxidation to the aldehyde using Dess–Martin period-
inane, Horner–Emmons homologation under standard conditions and
reduction of the a,b-unsaturated ester using DIBAL-H followed by
oxidation to give aldehyde 3, again employing Dess–Martin periodinane as
oxidant (55% overall)
§ Lactam 2 was prepared from pyroglutamic acid methyl ester via NaBH4
reduction to the alcohol, protection of the alcohol as the TBDMS ether and
Boc protection of the amide under standard conditions. a-Selenation
employing LDA and phenylselenyl bromide followed by syn elimination
using hydrogen peroxide and pyridine afforded lactam 2 (46% overall).
¶ Full details of the X-ray crystallographic studies on lactam 11 will be
reported elsewhere.
∑ Note added at proof: Harrison and co-workers have recently determined
the absolute stereochemisty of the lactam entity of pramanicin from
biosynthetic considerations; see ref. 9.
1 R. E. Schwartz, G. L. Helms, E. A. Bolessa, K. E. Wilson, R. A.
Giacobbe, J. S. Tkacz, G. F. Bills, J. M. Liesch, D. L. Zink, J. E. Curotto,
B. Pramanik and J. C. Onishi, Tetrahedron, 1994, 50, 1675.
2 P. H. M. Harrison, D. W. Hughes and R. W. Riddoch, Chem. Commun.,
1998, 273.
3 C. Cow, D. Valentini and P. Harrison, Can. J. Chem., 1997, 75, 884.
4 K. Tamao, N. Ishida, T. Tanaka and M. Kumada, Organometallics, 1983,
2, 1694. For a review on the oxidation of the carbon–silicon bond see
G. R. Jones and Y. Landais, Tetrahedron, 1996, 52, 7599.
5 I. Fleming, R. Henning, D. C. Parker, H. E. Plaut and P. E. J. Sanderson,
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 1995, 317.
6 W. Adam and A. K. Smerz, Tetrahedron, 1996, 52, 5799.
7 T. Apelqvist and D. Wensbo, Tetrahedron Lett., 1996, 37, 1471
8 A. S. Pilcher and P. DeShong, J. Org. Chem., 1993, 58, 5130.
9 P. Duspara, S. I. Jenkins, D. W. Hughes and P. H. M. Harrison, Chem.
Commun., 1998, 2643.
Fig. 1 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) spectra showing olefinic resonance’s
(left) and protons a to epoxide (d ~ 1.6, right); top: diastereoisomer 7;
middle: diastereoisomer 9; bottom: authentic pramanicin.
Communication 8/07988I
134
Chem. Commun., 1999, 133–134