4056 Organometallics, Vol. 18, No. 20, 1999
Fryzuk et al.
Ta ble 7: Selected Bon d Len gth s in
free dinitrogen or argon by means of standard Schlenk or
glovebox techniques.48 Hexanes, toluene, Et2O, and THF were
refluxed over CaH prior to a final distillation from either
sodium metal or sodium benzophenone ketyl under an Ar
atmosphere. Deuterated solvents were dried over potassium
and vacuum transferred. They were then degassed by three
“freeze-pump-thaw” cycles. The solid-state magnetic mea-
surements were determined from Gouy measurements per-
formed on a J ohnson Matthey MSB-1 apparatus at room
temperature. The magnetic measurements in solution were
performed using Evans’ method with ferrocene as standard.32,33
[
i-P r P 2Cp ]MoCl2, 11
atom
atom
distance (Å)
atom
atom
distance (Å)
Mo
Mo
Mo
Mo
Mo
Cl(1)
Cl(2)
P(1)
P(2)
C(1)
2.4899(8)
2.4678(8)
2.5380(7)
2.5910(8)
2.254(3)
Mo
Mo
Mo
Mo
Mo
C(2)
C(3)
C(4)
C(5)
Cp
2.339(3)
2.395(3)
2.301(3)
2.216(3)
1.955
Ta ble 8: Selected Bon d An gles in [i-P r P 2Cp ]MoCl2,
11
Rea gen t Syn th eses. 1,1-C5H4(SiMe3CH2Cl)2,34
[
i-PrP2Cp]-
atom atom atom angle (deg) atom atom atom angle (deg)
ZrCl3,19 i-PrP2Cp]Li,18 NbCl3(DME),49 Nb(O)Cl3(THF)2,50 and
[
Cl(1) Mo Cl(2) 135.40(3) Cl(1) Mo
P(1) Mo P(2) 136.28(3) Cl(2) Mo
Cp
Cp
Cp
Cp
110.3
114.3
113.0
110.5
51
MoCl3(THF)3 were prepared using literature procedures.
Mercury was purchased from BDH and purified following a
literature procedure.52 Sodium amalgam was made under a
nitrogen atmosphere and washed with toluene until the
washing showed no gray coloration. MeMgCl and MeMgBr (3
M solutions in diethyl ether) were purchased from Aldrich.
CO was purchased from Praxair and used as received.
Syn th esis of [P h P 2Cp ]Li. A solution of 1,1-C5H4(SiMe3CH2-
Cl)2 (10 g, 36 mmol) in THF (120 mL) and toluene (20 mL)
was heated to 65 °C and added dropwise to a solution of Ph2-
PLi (20.63 g, 107 mmol) in THF (120 mL) at 65 °C. The
reaction mixture was allowed to cool to room temperature, and
the solvent and excess Ph2PH were removed in vacuo. The
white residue was then extracted with toluene and filtered
through Celite. Removal of the solvent produced a yellow air-
and moisture-sensitive oil (yield ) 65%, 13.3 g). 1H NMR
(C6D6): δH ) 0.05 (s, 12H, Si(CH3)2); 1.30 (m, 4H, SiCH2P);
6.7 (m, 3H, C5H3); 7.00 (m, 20H, C6H5). 31P{1H}: δP ) -22.12
(1:1:1:1 quartet, J PLi ) 84 Hz).
Cl(1) Mo P(1)
Cl(2) Mo P(2)
79.75(3) P(1)
84.20(3) P(2)
Mo
Mo
pushes the phosphines slightly away from the Mo(III)
center, since the electronic factors in these two com-
pounds are very similar; confirmation of this is apparent
from the longer Mo-P bond distances in (η5-C5Me5)-
MoCl2(PMe3)2 of 2.5104(8) and 2.5080(8) Å.42 An exami-
nation of C-C bond distances of the Cp ring and Mo-
C(Cp) bond lengths shows that the bonding of Cp to the
metal is consistent with η2,η3 character. The carbons of
the η3 system, C(2), C(3), and C(4), are further away
from the metal than C(1) and C(5), which belong to the
η2 system. In many piano-stool complexes a slight tilting
of the Cp ring from a plane perpendicular to the Cp-M
axis is observed.27 Selected bond lengths and bond
angles are show in Tables 7 and 8.
Complex 11 reacts with MeMgBr at -78 °C, to yield
a brown oil, which shows a broad singlet in its ESR
Syn th esis of [i-P r P 2Cp ]Zr Cl2, 2. To an intimate mixture
of Na/Hg (92 g, 0.012 mol) and [i-PrP2Cp]ZrCl3 (1 g, 1.56 mmol)
was added toluene (100 mL) under N2. The reaction mixture
was degassed by three “freeze-pump-thaw” cycles and was
stirred for 48 h under vacuum, during which the solution
turned green. It then was filtered through Celite, and the
solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure to yield a dark
green microcrystalline solid (yield ) 85%, 0.8 g). ESR (tolu-
ene): g ) 1.96; a(31P) ) 22.7 G, 2P, a(91Zr) ) 13.6 G, 1Zr. Anal.
1
spectrum. The product is NMR active, and both H and
31P{1H} NMR spectra indicate that the crude product
is a mixture of compounds. All attempts to separate and
characterize these species have proved futile.
Con clu sion s
The use of a cyclopentadienyl ligand with pendant
donors is not a new approach to ligand design. Indeed,
there are many examples of this in the literature.43,44
What is significant about this work is that the examples
of complexes of the general type CpMCl2(PR3)2 have
been prepared for M ) Zr, Nb, and Mo with a modified
cyclopentadienyl with two pendant phosphine donors.
Other cyclopentadienyl units with one pendant phos-
phine are known.43,45-4745-47 However, our approach to
using two pendant phosphine donors is unique to our
knowledge. These complexes are reactive, as evidenced
by their reactivity with carbon monoxide. Attempts to
generate alkyl derivatives of these second-row trivalent
metal complexes have only been partially successful. In
general complicated mixtures result that have so far
eluded purification.
Calcd for
C23H47Cl2P2Si2Zr‚(NaCl)0.1: C, 45.31; H, 7.77.
Found: C, 45.13; H, 7.99. MS: m/e 603 (M+). µ (solid) ) 2.0
µB, µ (solution in C6D6) ) 1.8 µB.
Syn t h esis of [i-P r P 2Cp ]Zr ClMe, 3. To a solution of
[
i-PrP2Cp]ZrCl2 (0.25 g, 0.41 mmol) in toluene was added
MeMgCl (0.32 mL, 0.45 mmol) dropwise at -78 °C. The
solution was then warmed to room temperature and stirred
for 4 h, during which a white precipitate formed. The reaction
mixture was then concentrated under reduced pressure and
filtered through Celite, and the solvent was evaporated,
yielding a green powder (yield ) 70%, 0.17 g). ESR (toluene):
g ) 2.01; a(31P) ) 23.0 G, 2P, a(1H) ) 8.0 G, 3H, a(91Zr) ) 8.0
G, 1Zr. Anal. Calcd for C24H50ClP2Si2Zr: C, 49.41; H, 8.64.
Found: C, 49.33; H, 8.93.
Rea ction of [i-P r P 2Cp ]Zr Cl2, 2, w ith CO; F or m a tion of
[
i-P r P 2Cp]Zr (CO)2Cl, 4. A degassed solution of [i-PrP2Cp]ZrCl2,
2 (0.05 g, 0.09 mmol), in C6D6 was stirred under 1 atm of CO
for 24 h, during which the color changed from dark green to
1
brown. H NMR (C6D6): δH ) 0.12 and 0.28 (s, 6H, Si(CH3)2),
Exp er im en ta l Section
2
2
0.51 and 0.82 (dd, 2H, J HH ) 15 Hz, J PH ) 9 Hz, SiCH2P),
Gen er a l P r oced u r es. Unless otherwise stated all manipu-
lations were carried out under an atmosphere of dry, oxygen-
3
3
0.97, 1.22, 1.29, 1.32 (dd, 6H, J HH ) 7 Hz, J PH ) 7 Hz, CH-
(CH3)2), 1.95 and 2.48 (sept, 2H, J HH ) 7 Hz,CH(CH3)2), 5.19
3
(42) Baker, R. T.; Calabrese, J . C.; Harlow, R. L.; Williams, I. D.
Organometallics 1993, 12, 830.
(43) Charrier, C.; Mathey, F. Tetrahedron Lett. 1978, 27, 2407.
(44) J utzi, P.; Redeker, T. Eur. J . Inorg. Chem. 1998, 663.
(45) Schore, N. E. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 7410.
(46) Schore, N. E.; Benner, L. S.; LaBelle, B. E. Inorg. Chem. 1981,
20, 3200.
(48) Brown, T. L.; Dickerhoof, D. W.; Bafus, D. A.; Morgan, G. L.
Rev. Sci. Instrum. 1962, 33, 491.
(49) Roskamp, E. J .; Pedersen, S. F. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109,
6551.
(50) Gibson, V. C.; Kee, T. P.; Shaw, A. Polyhedron 1988, 7, 2217.
(51) Dilworth, J . R.; Richards, R. L. Inorg. Synth. 1980, 20, 121.
(52) Perrin, D. D.; Armarego, W. L. F. Purification of Laboratory
Chemicals, 3 ed.; Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd.: Oxford, 1994.
(47) Bensley, D. M., J r.; Mintz, E. A. J . Organomet. Chem. 1988,
353, 93.