J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 8407-8408
8407
desirable for the rapid preparation of a multitude of compounds
with important biological activities.
Efficient Solid-Phase Synthesis of Compounds
Containing Phenylalanine and Its Derivatives via
Side-Chain Attachment to the Polymer Support
The most efficient way to design a library of phenylalanine-
containing molecules would be to attach the phenylalanine side
chain to the polymer support so that the residues at both the N-
and C-termini could be varied, leading to libraries with high
diversity. Recently, several novel strategies utilizing resin-bound
arylsilane as a “traceless linker” have been developed for solid-
phase synthesis of aromatics or heteroaromatic compounds.10-14
This method allows the attachment of substrates to the support
at an inert site within the molecule. Upon cleavage from the resin
by protiodesilylation, no trace or memory of attachment to the
polymer support is left. Also, silicone-directed ipso-substitution
of arylsilanes is frequently used for regiospecific introduction of
functional groups such as bromine and iodine into the aromatic
ring, thereby permitting an even higher degree of diversity in a
desired chemical library.15,16 Libraries of compounds constructed
on a solid support using silyl linkages include 1,4-benzodiaz-
epines,10 biaryls,12 benzofurans,12 and tricyclics.13 We reasoned
that an appropriate arylsilyl linkage could be used for tethering
phenylalanine to the polymer via its phenyl group, and then further
elongation of the amino acid backbone would allow rapid
synthesis of phenylalanine-containing molecules. Here we report
the design of polymer-bound phenylalanine precursors as new
building blocks for solid-phase synthesis and their application in
dipeptide synthesis on a solid support.
Younghee Lee and Richard B. Silverman*
Department of Chemistry, Northwestern UniVersity
EVanston, Illinois 60208-3113
ReceiVed May 20, 1999
Combinatorial chemistry, combined with recent advances in
robotic screening, has become an important tool in drug discov-
ery.1 Solid-phase synthesis allows the use of excess reagents to
drive the reaction to completion and easy removal of the reagents
and side products by simple washing with solvent. Since the
introduction of the Merrifield method for peptide synthesis,2 large
libraries of linear biopolymers such as peptides and oligonucleo-
tides as well as organic compounds have been generated.3
Generally, the synthesis of peptides on a solid support is carried
out from the C-terminus to the N-terminus for a variety of
reasons.4 A more efficient approach to the synthesis of peptides
involves the anchoring of the side chain to the polymer, an
approach that has been well utilized, especially for head-to-tail
cyclization of cyclic peptides. This methodology provides minimal
risks for side reactions, such as dimerization and oligomerization,
even under reaction conditions of high concentration. Furthermore,
this side-chain anchoring strategy allows the generation of more
diverse libraries of compounds than the conventional unidirec-
tional way (C- to N- or N- to C-elongation). Unfortunately, this
useful technology has been applicable only to a few amino acids
with polar side chains, such as Asp/Glu (COOH), Cys (SH), Ser/
Tyr (OH), Lys (NH2), and His (imidazole).5
Because of the nonpolar nature and steric bulkiness of its side
chain, phenylalanine is one of the key pharmacophores in
peptidomimetics for favorable hydrophobic interactions with
biological targets.6 Almost every aspartyl protease, such as HIV
protease, renin, and cathepsins D and E, has a preference for
hydrophobic amino acid side chains at the P1 position;7 conse-
quently, peptidomimetics designed to inhibit these enzymes
generally contain phenylalanine mimics or other bulky hydro-
phobic groups at the P1 position. A large number of naturally
occurring linear peptides with antineoplastic activity, such as
Dolastatin 10 and 15,8 and numerous families of cyclic peptides9
that are hydrophobic also contain at least one phenylalanine
residue. Therefore, a new methodology utilizing phenylalanine
or masked phenylalanine as the building block would be highly
Scheme 1 illustrates the synthesis of a phenylalanine derivative
having a silyl linker attached to the phenyl ring and the loading
of this compound to brominated polystyrene resin. A carbon-
carbon bond-forming reaction between 2 and the lithitiated
bislactim ether17 3 in THF at -78 °C provided a mixture of
(6) (a) Garrett, G. S.; McPhail, S. J.; Tornheim, K.; Correa, P. E.; McIver,
J. M. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1999, 9, 301-306. (b) Fink, C. A.; Carlson,
J. E.; Boehm, C.; McTaggart, P.; Qiao, Y.; Doughty, J.; Ganu, V.; Melton,
R.; Goldberg, R. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1999, 9, 195-200. (c) Roush, W.
R.; Gwaltney, S. L., II; Cheng, J.; Scheidt, K. A.; McKerrow, J. H.; Hansell,
E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 10994-10995. (d) Roush, W. R.; Gonzalez,
F. V.; McKerrow, J. H.; Hansell, E. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1998, 8, 2809-
2812. (e) Adams, J.; Behnke, M.; Chen, S.; Cruickshank, A. A.; Dick, L. R.;
Grenier, L.; Klunder, J. M.; Ma, Y.-T.; Plamondon, L.; Stein, R. L. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. Lett. 1998, 8, 333. (f) Bailey, S.; Bolognese, B.; Buckle, D. R.;
Faller, A.; Jackson, S.; Louis-Flamberg, P.; McCord, M.; Mayer, R. J.;
Marshall, L. A.; Smith, D. G. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1998, 8, 29-34. (g)
Ohda, T.; Tsuchiya, N.; Nishimura, K.; Ikeda, E.; Wakayama J.; Takei, H.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1996, 6, 543-546. (h) Kick, E. K.; Ellman, J. A.
J. Med. Chem. 1995, 38, 1427-1430.
(7) Loh, Y. P.; Cawley, N. X.; Friedman, T. C.; Pu, L. P. In Aspartic
Proteinases: Structure, Function, Biology, and Biomedical Implications;
Takahashi, K., Ed.; Plenum Press: New York, 1995; pp 519-527.
(8) (a) Poncet, J.; Hortala, L.; Busquet, M.; Gueritte-Voegelein, F.; Thoret,
S.; Pierre, A.; Atassi, G.; Jouin, P. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1998, 8, 2855-
2858. (b) Akaji, K.; Hayashi, Y.; Kiso, Y.; Kuriyama, N. J. Org. Chem. 1999,
64, 405-411. (c) Pettit, G. R.; Kamano, Y.; Herald, C. L.; Fujii, Y.; Kizu,
H.; Boyd, M. R.; Boettner, F. E.; Doubek, D. L.; Schmidt, J. M.; Chapuis,
J.-C. Tetrahedron 1993, 49, 9151-9170.
* Corresponding author. Phone: (847) 491-5653. Fax: (847) 491-7713.
E-mail:Agman@chem.nwu.edu.
(1) (a) Gordon, E. M.; Barrett, R. W.; Dower, W. J.; Fodor, S. P.; Gallop,
M. A. J. Med. Chem. 1994, 37, 1385-1401. (b) Baum, R. Chem. Eng. News
1996, 74 (12 Feb), 28.
(9) (a) Belofsky, G. N.; Jensen, P. R.; Fenical, W. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999,
40, 2913-2916. (b) Hawkins, C. J.; Lavin, M. F.; Marshall, K. A.; van den
Brenk, A. L.; Watters, D. J. J. Med. Chem. 1990, 33, 1634-1638. (c) Degnan,
B. M.; Hawkins, C. J.; Lavin, M. F.; McCaffrey, E. J.; Parry, D. L.; van den
Brenk, A. L.; Watters, D. J. J. Med. Chem. 1989, 32, 1349-1354. (d) Norley,
M. C.; Pattenden, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 3087-3090. (e) Freeman,
D. J.; Pattenden, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 3251-3254.
(10) Plunkett, M. J.; Ellman, J. A. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 1885-2893.
(11) Chenera, B.; Finkelstein, J. A.; Veber, D. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995,
117, 11999-12000.
(2) Merrifield, R. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1963, 85, 2149-2154.
(3) (a) Scott, J. K.; Smith, G. P. Science 1990, 249, 386. (b) Lam, K. S.;
Salmon, S. E.; Hersh, E. M.; Hruby, V. J.; Karzmierski, W. M. Knapp, R. J.
Nature 1991, 354, 82. (c) Houghton, R. A.; Pinilla, C.; Blondelle, S. E.; Appel,
J. R.; Dooley, C. T.; Cuervo, J. H. Nature 1991, 354, 84. (d) Tuerk, C.; Gold,
L. Science 1990, 18, 6197. (e) Ellington, A. D.; Szostak, J. W. Nature 1990,
346, 818. (f) Blackwell, J. K.; Weintraub, H. Science 1990, 250, 818. (g)
Pollock, R.; Treisman, R. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990, 18, 6197. (h) Thompson,
L. A.; Ellman, J. A. Chem. ReV. 1996, 96, 555.
(4) C- to N-elongation of peptides is less prone to racemization problems
than the N- to C-elaboration. Also, all of the Fmoc- and/or Boc-protected
amino acids are commercially available. Stewart, J. M.; Young, J, D. Solid-
Phase Peptide Synthesis; Pierce Chemical Co.; Rockford, IL, 1984.
(5) (a) Trzeciak, A.; Bannwarth, W. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 4557-
4560. (b) Sabatino, G.; Chelli, M.; Mazzucco, S.; Ginanneschi, M.; Papini,
A. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 809-812. (c) Rovero, P.; Quartara, L.;
Fabbri, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 2639-2642. (d) Kates, S. A.; Sole, N.
A.; Johnson, C. R.; Hudson, D.; Barany, G.; Albericio, F. Tetrahedron Lett.
1993, 34, 1549-1552. (e) Sugiura, T.; Hamada, Y.; Shioiri, T. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1987, 28, 2251-2254.
(12) Boehm, T. L.; Hollis Showlter, H. D. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 6498-
6499.
(13) Woolard, F. X.; Paetsch, J.; Ellman, J. A. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62,
6102-6103.
(14) Hu, Y.; Porco, J. A. Jr.; Labadie, J. W.; Gooding, O. W.; Trost, B.
M. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 4518-4521.
(15) Chan, T. H. Synthesis 1979, 761-786.
(16) Han, Y.; Walker, S. D.; Young, R. N. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37,
2703-2706.
(17) Schollkopf, U.; Groth, U.; Deng, C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.
1981, 20, 798-799.
10.1021/ja991679d CCC: $18.00 © 1999 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 08/31/1999