Communication
In sharp contrast to benzoyl hydrazide (1a), an N’-substitut-
ed aroyl hydrazide, such as PhCONHNHBn (5a) failed to under-
go oxidative Mizoroki–Heck reaction with styrene (2a) to give
alkene 3a under the standard conditions. This result indicates
that the NHNH2 group is essential for the oxidative Mizoroki–
Heck reaction of terminal alkenes with aroyl hydrazides.
Control experiments indicated that the desired reaction did
not occur in the absence of PdCl2 and a much lower yield was
obtained from the reaction without CuI (Table 3, entries 1 and
2). Furthermore, we examined the catalytic ability of [Pd(OTs)2-
(MeCN)2], which might be generated from PdCl2 and p-tolu-
enesulfonic acid, and found that the corresponding reaction
gave only 16% yield (entry 3). These results suggest that PdCl2
serves as the major active PdII catalyst, which can be regenerat-
ed through copper-mediated aerobic oxidation after being re-
duced to Pd0 during the reaction (see below). The PdCl2/CuI
(5:1) catalyst system was also responsible for a minor side reac-
tion, the Wacker oxidation of styrene (2a),[14] wherein a trace
amount of acetophenone was generated and condensed with
benzoyl hydrazide (1a) to give Ph(Me)C=NHNHCOPh (6a) that
was tentatively assigned by electrospray ionization (ESI) mass
spectrometric analysis of the reaction mixture.[15] Moreover, the
ESI mass spectrometric analysis allowed tentative assignment
of two other byproducts, PhCONHNHCOPh (7a) and PhCOCH=
CHPh (8a),[16] which lend substantial support to the formation
of the proposed key aroylpalladium intermediate during the
reaction (see below).
Table 1. Optimization of reaction conditions.[a,b]
Entry
[Pd]
[Cu]
Acid
Solvent
Yield [%][c]
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13[d]
14
15
16[e]
PdCl2
PdCl2
PdCl2
PdCl2
PdCl2
PdCl2
PdCl2
Pd(OAc)2
[Pd(PPh3)4]
PdCl2
PdCl2
PdCl2
PdCl2
PdCl2
PdCl2
PdCl2
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
CuCl
CuBr
CuI
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
TsOH
TsOH
H2SO4
TsOH
DMSO
DMF
MeCN
dioxane
toluene
propanol
DMSO/MeCN (1:1)
DMSO/MeCN (1:1)
DMSO/MeCN (1:1)
DMSO/MeCN (1:1)
DMSO/MeCN (1:1)
DMSO/MeCN (1:1)
DMSO/MeCN (1:1)
DMSO/MeCN (1:1)
DMSO/MeCN (1:1)
DMSO/MeCN (1:1)
10
trace
trace
0
0
0
11
0
0
9
11
17
19
86
43
77
CuI
CuI
CuI
CuI
[a] Reaction conditions: hydrazide 1a (0.44 mmol), alkene 2a (0.40 mmol),
[Pd] (5 mol%), [Cu] (if any, 1 mol%), acid (if any, 1.2 equiv), air (1 atm.),
solvent (1.0 mL), 1008C (oil bath), 3 h. [b] In all cases alkene 3a was ob-
tained as a single regioisomer with >99:1 E/Z selectivity. [c] Isolated
yield. [d] 20 mol% TsOH was used. [e] The reaction was run at 808C (oil
bath). Ac=acetyl, Ts=p-toluenesulfonyl.
dition of 1.2 equivalents of p-toluenesulfonic acid improved
the yield to 86% (entry 14). Whereas the reaction did take
place at a lower temperature, the desired product was ob-
tained in a lower yield (entry 16).
For comparison, the reaction of benzoyl hydrazide (1a) with
styrene (2a) was performed under an oxygen atmosphere to
give alkene 3a in 65% yield (Table 3, entry 4). The higher con-
centration of molecular oxygen led to a lower yield probably
by accelerating the decomposition of the hydrazide (see
below). Much to our surprise, the reaction did take place in
the absence of an oxygen atmosphere albeit that the desired
product was obtained in a much lower yield (entry 5). Further-
more, CuI proved to be irrelevant to the reaction without
oxygen (entry 6). These results allow us to conclude that the
solvent, dimethyl sulfoxide, is capable of serving as an oxidant
to convert Pd0 to PdII (see below).[17] To our delight, this conclu-
sion was unambiguously confirmed by the experiment shown
in Equation (2). When dibenzyl sulfoxide (9a) rather than di-
methyl sulfoxide was used as the cosolvent for the reaction of
benzoyl hydrazide (1a) with styrene (2a) in the presence of
5 mol% PdCl2 and 1.2 equivalents of p-toluenesulfonic acid
under a nitrogen atmosphere, a significant amount of dibenzyl
sulfoxide (9a) was found to be reduced to give dibenzyl sul-
fide (10a).
In the presence of 5 mol% PdCl2, 1 mol% CuI, and 1.2 equiv-
alents of p-toluenesulfonic acid and open to air, a range of
aroyl hydrazides smoothly underwent oxidative Mizoroki–Heck
reaction with arylethenes at 1008C (oil bath) to give structural-
ly diverse 1,2-diaryl alkenes in moderate to good yields with
excellent regio- and E-selectivity (Table 2, entries 1–25).[13] It is
noteworthy that both electron-withdrawing and -donating
groups were successfully introduced into the aromatic rings of
the products by employing the aroyl hydrazides or the aryle-
thenes bearing such groups and that the oxidative conditions
were mild enough to be compatible with very electron-rich
aryl groups, such as hydroxyphenyl, aminophenyl, and thienyl
groups (entries 3, 4, 14, and 17). This chemistry was successful-
ly extended to a variety of terminal alkenes, such as acrylates,
acrylamides, N-protected allylamines, allylphosphine oxides,
and allyl sulfones, and a range of functionalized 1,2-disubstitut-
ed alkenes were obtained in moderate to excellent yields with
extremely high regio- and E-selectivity (entries 26–31). When
compared to previously reported Mizoroki–Heck-type reactions
of arenecarboxylic acids and their derivatives,[3–8] the reaction
exhibited broader scope with regard to terminal alkenes
through oxidative arylation of the vinylic CÀH bonds in the N-
allyl, S-allyl, and P-allyl groups. In addition, as demonstrated by
the results summarized in Table 2, the reaction tolerated
a wide variety of functional groups, such as alkoxy, hydroxy,
amino, fluoro, chloro, bromo, cyano, nitro, ester, amide, imide,
phosphine oxide, and sulfone groups.
Aroyl hydrazides were subjected to decomposition either by
PdCl2 or by CuI under the standard reaction conditions. Treat-
ment of benzoyl hydrazide (1a) with 1.1 equivalents of p-tolu-
Chem. Eur. J. 2014, 20, 2765 – 2769
2766
ꢀ 2014 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim