the proposed biosynthesis. The only major difference be-
tween the ring system in such an acyl immonium intermedi-
ate and biosynthetic intermediate 2 is that the five-membered
indoline ring is closed in 2. Addition of the aniline nitrogen
in 5 to the immonium carbon formed by protonation of the
enamide double bond would yield the isoschizogamine
framework.
This idea was used to model a key transformation in the
total synthesis of isoschizogamine. Because enamide 5 did
not undergo the desired cyclization, it was reduced with
lithium aluminum hydride to tertiary enamine 6. Upon
workup,5 enamine 6 was protonated to give immonium ion
7, which cyclized to form diastereomeric aminals 8 and 9.
The formation of the two observed diastereomers can be
explained by protonation of the two diastereotopic faces of
the double bond in enamine 6. The stereochemistry indicated
in structure 8 was established by single-crystal X-ray
diffraction. Treatment of either isomer with acetic acid
resulted in an 85:15 ratio of 8 to 9.
3-azidopropanal7 in an aldol reaction. There is disagreement
in the literature as to whether 2-substituted cyclopentanones
can be deprotonted regioselectivly at the more substituted
R-position.8 However, it was found that the thermodynamic
enolate could be formed with high selectivity by slowly
adding a slight excess of KHMDS to 13 over 2 h. To obtain
high regioselectivity and diastereoselectivity in the aldol
reaction, the enolate of a metal other than potassium was
needed. Consequently, a number of Lewis acids were
examined for trapping the potassium enolate. Eventually we
found that treatment of the potassium enolate with Bu2BOTf
and subsequent aldol reaction gave exclusively syn aldol 14.
The use of i-Bu2AlCl gave a slightly higher yield of adduct
14, but with this Lewis acid there was produced a mixture
of diastereomers that was difficult to separate. Hydrogenation
of the azide group in aldol 14 gave imine 12.
Unfortunately, the Michael addition reaction of imine 12
to R,â-unsaturated acid 11 which was directly analogous to
that used in our vallesamidine synthesis (Scheme 3) gave
none of the desired product. Changing the Michael acceptor
to the acid chloride,9,10 azide,9,11 anhydride,9 and ester also
all failed to give the desired addition-cyclization product.
We then turned our attention to R,â-unsaturated dicarbonyl
compounds as the Michael acceptors in this reaction. A
search of the literature indicated that Meldrum’s acid
derivatives of aldehydes such as 16 (Scheme 5) were
excellent Michael acceptors and also had the advantage that
the adducts formed from the Michael addition to these
substrates could serve as good acylating agents.12 Thus, R,â-
unsaturated diester 16 was prepared by Knovenagel conden-
sation of 2-nitroveratraldehyde with Meldrum’s acid (Scheme
5). We then utilized this Michael acceptor in our imine
addition-cyclization reaction. Imine 12 underwent Michael
addition to 16 at -40 °C to give an intermediate which, upon
heating, underwent cyclization with concomitant loss of
acetone and carbon dioxide, providing a mixture of diaster-
eomeric lactams 17 and 18 in a ratio of 88:12 and a total
yield of 74% from aldol 14. Dehydration of 17 with Martin’s
sulfurane13 gave alkene 19.
With confidence that the basic aminal-forming reaction
would work, we set out to prepare isoschizogamine via an
appropriately functionalized version of lactam 5 such as 10
(Scheme 3). Lactam 10 was envisioned as coming from the
Scheme 3
Michael addition of the enamine tautomer of imine 12 to
cinnamic acid 11 in a reaction similar to that used in our
vallesamidine synthesis.4
As shown in Scheme 4, the thermodynamic enolate of the
readily available ketone 136 was allowed to react with
The reduction-cyclization sequence was carried out under
conditions similar to those used in the model system (Scheme
2). The aromatic nitro group in lactam 19 was first reduced
using NaBH4 and catalytic Cu(acac)2 (Scheme 6) to give
compound 20. The air and acid sensitivity of 20 made it
14
Scheme 4
1316
Org. Lett., Vol. 1, No. 8, 1999