Fig. 1 1H NMR spectra of polymers (a) I and (b) II.
Fig. 2 Fluorescence and UV/Vis spectra of polymers I and II in solution. (a)
I in THF, (b) II in 1% NaOH, (c) II in DMSO.
Fig. 1 shows the 1H NMR spectra of both polymers. Before
hydrolysis, Polymer I shows chemical shifts due to ester
moieties at d 4.40 and 1.5. The chemical shifts due to the
ethylene oxide moieties appear between d 3.0 and 3.7 as broad
multiple peaks. The aromatic and vinyl protons are totally
overlapped; only one broad peak at d 8.6 is observed. After
hydrolysis, a new peak at d 13.5, corresponding to the
carboxylic acid protons, appeared in the spectrum of Polymer II.
The chemical shifts due to the ester moieties in Polymer I
disappeared, indicating complete hydrolysis. Attempts to carry
out the hydrolysis in acidic media such as TFA were
unsuccessful.15 It was found that, under acidic conditions, the
conjugated polymer backbone was destroyed, resulting in a
yellow polymer. Apparently, the acidic protons attacked the
vinyl bond in the PPV backbone. The vulnerability of the vinyl
bond to proton attack may be due to the partial polarization
induced by the alternate electron-withdrawing and electron-
donating substitution pattern of the backbones.
Polymer II also possesses good thermal stability. Differential
scanning calorimetry (DSC) measurement and thermal gravi-
metric analysis (TGA) show that Polymer II has a decomposi-
tion temperature above 325 °C. No crosslinking process,
common to the PPV backbone, is observed in the temperature
range of 50–350 °C, indicating that the vinyl bonds on different
polymer chains are well separated.
Fig. 2 shows the UV/Vis and fluorescence spectra of both
polymers. Polymer I has two absorption peaks: ca. 506 nm is the
absorption peak of the PPV backbone, ca. 310 nm can be
assigned to the conjugated oxadiazole unit. After hydrolysis, the
absorption of the PPV backbone is slightly blue-shifted,
especially in aqueous base solutions. The maximum absorption
wavelength in 1% NaOH is 484 nm.
In summary, we have synthesized a novel PPV polymer
containing carboxylic acid functional groups. This polymer
possesses solubility in both organic solvents (DMSO) and
aqueous bases (such as NaOH, NH4OH etc.). The unique
structure of this polymer makes it an attractive system for self-
assembly studies. Its high electron affinity11 and photo-
luminescence properties also warrant further study of this
polymer for light-emitting diode applications, particularly as an
electron-transporting layer in multilayer devices.
This work is supported by the University of Missouri-Kansas
City and the University of Missouri Research Board. We thank
Mr Qing Wang at the University of Chicago for the GPC
measurements.
Notes and references
1 Conjugated Polymers, ed. J. L. Bredas and R. Silbey, Kluwer, The
Netherlands, 1991.
2 T. A. Skotheim, Ed. Handbook of Conducting Polymers I & II, ed. T. A.
Skotheim, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1986.
3 N. C. Greenham and R. H. Friend, Solid State Phys., 1995, 49, 1.
4 T.-A. Chen, X. Wu and R. D. Rieke, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1995, 117,
233.
5 T. Bjørnholm, D. R. Greve, N. Reitzel, T. Hassenkam, K. Kjaer, P. B.
Howes, N. B. Larsen, J. Bøgelund, M. Jayaraman, P. C. Ewbank and
R. D. McCullough, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120, 7643.
6 V. V. Tsukruk, Prog. Polym. Sci., 1997, 22, 247.
7 R. D. McCullough, P. C. Ewbank and R. S. Loewe, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1997, 119, 633.
8 I. Benjamin, H. Hong, Y. Avny, D. Davidov and R. Neumann, J. Mater.
Chem., 1998, 8, 919.
9 A. Kraft, A. C. Grimsdale and A. B. Holmes, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
1998, 37, 402.
10 K. Eichhorst-Gerner, A. Stabel, G. Moessner, D. Declerq, S. Valiya-
veettil, V. Enkelmann, K. Müllen and J. P. Rabe, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
Engl., 1996, 35, 1492.
11 Z. Peng and J. Zhang, Chem. Mater., 1999, 11, 1138.
12 R. F. Heck, Org. React., 1982, 27, 345.
13 B. Winkler, L. Dai and A. W. H. Mau, Chem. Mater., 1999, 11, 704.
14 F. C. Chang and N. F. Wood, Tetrahedron. Lett., 1964, 2969.
15 D. J. Pesak, J. S. Moore and T. E. Wheat, Macromolecules, 1997, 30,
6467.
Polymer I shows red fluorescence with an emission max-
imum at 615 nm. The photoluminescence quantum efficiency of
Polymer I in dilute THF solutions is 3.7%. The fluorescence of
Polymer II is significantly blue-shifted compared to that of
Polymer I and is dependent on the choice of solvents. When a
dilute DMSO solution of Polymer II was excited at 510 nm, a
maximum emission at 555 nm with a shoulder at around 595 nm
was observed. Polymer II in dilute NaOH solution, however,
has an emission maximum at 593 nm, nearly 40 nm red-shifted
compared to that of its DMSO solutions, and has a photo-
luminescence quantum efficiency of 4.2%.
Communication 9/04822G
1856
Chem. Commun., 1999, 1855–1856