boron site, must be now optimized in order to obtain sensitive
detection operating over a large F2 concentration range.
Drs M. Vaultier, J.-F. Pilard and G. Marchand are fully
acknowledged for their help in the synthesis of monomers. The
‘Région de Bretagne’ is also acknowledged for a research grant
to one of the authors (M. N.).
Notes and references
† Selected data for 1b: dH(CDCl3) 1.04 (t, 2 H), 1.15 (s, 12 H), 2.55 (t, 2 H),
6.11 (dd, 1 H), 6.48–6.60 (m, 2 H), 8.01 (s, 1 H); dC 21.60, 25.22, 83.38,
108.66, 114.94, 117.90, 126.74.
1 B. Fabre and J. Simonet, Coord. Chem. Rev., 1998, 180, 1211.
2 T. M. Swager, Acc. Chem. Res., 1998, 31, 201.
3 P. Bäuerle and S. Scheib, Adv. Mater., 1993, 5, 848.
4 H. Korri Youssoufi, M. Hmyene, A. Yassar and F. Garnier, J. Electro-
anal. Chem., 1996, 406, 187.
5 A. Ion, I. Ion, A. Popescu, M. Ungureanu, J. C. Moutet and E. Saint-
Aman, Adv. Mater., 1997, 9, 711.
6 L. M. Goldenberg, I. Lévesque, M. Leclerc and M. C. Petty,
J. Electroanal. Chem., 1998, 447, 1.
Fig. 2 Calibration curve for F2 in H2O–MeCN (1+1 v/v) + 5 3 1021
M
LiClO4 obtained with a poly(1b)-coated platinum (8 3 1023 cm2) electrode
(electropolymerization charge: 280 mC cm22). I and Io are the currents
measured at 20.42 V on the voltammetric curves (100 mV s21) in the
presence and absence of KF, respectively.
7 F. Sannicolo, E. Brenna, T. Benincori, G. Zotti, S. Zecchin, G. Schiavon
and T. Pilati, Chem. Mater., 1998, 10, 2167.
electropolymerized using 70 mC cm22, only the second system
was observed for a large F2 concentration, e.g. 2 mM [Fig.
1(b)]. It must be pointed out that the electrochemical response of
poly(1b) was not changed when F2 was replaced by Cl2 or Br2
up to a tested concentration of 20 mM. Moreover the interaction
with F2 was specific for the boronate-containing polymer, as
the voltammetric response of an unfunctionalized polymer film
was found to be unmodified in the presence of this anion. Thus,
all these results are consistent with a selective electrochemical
recognition of F2 by poly(1b). The negative shift of the redox
potential indicates that the F2 bound polymer was easier to
oxidize. Such a result could be explained by a stabilization of
F2 bound to the boron atom by the positive charges along the
oxidized polymer backbone. The effect of the F2 concentration
on the current intensity of the system assigned to the F2 bound
polymer is shown in Fig. 2. As can be seen, an initial linear plot
at low F2 concentrations ( < 0.4 mM) is followed by a plateau
for larger concentrations indicating that all the binding sites in
the film were occupied. The slope and the linearity range of the
first part were found to be dependent on the film thickness. As
a matter of fact, the sensitivity to F2 was higher for thin films,
as already observed for other sensory materials.20
8 P. D. Beer, Acc. Chem. Res., 1998, 31, 71.
9 M. M. G. Antonisse and D. N. Reinhoudt, Chem. Commun., 1998,
443.
10 T. D. James, K. R. A. Samankumara Sandanayake and S. Shinkai,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1996, 35, 1910.
11 C. R. Cooper, N. Spencer and T. D. James, Chem. Commun., 1998,
1365.
12 H. Yamamoto, A. Ori, K. Ueda, C. Dusemund and S. Shinkai, Chem.
Commun., 1996, 407.
13 C. Dusemund, K. R. A. Samankumara Sandanayake and S. Shinkai,
J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1995, 333.
14 R. J.-P. Corriu, T. Deforth, W. E. Douglas, G. Guerrero and W. S.
Siebert, Chem. Commun., 1998, 963.
15 N. Matsumi, K. Naka and Y. Chujo, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120, 5112
and 10 776.
16 M. Kakushima, P. Hamel, R. Frenette and J. Rokach, J. Org. Chem.,
1983, 48, 3214.
17 R. Settambolo, R. Lazzaroni, T. Messeri, M. Mazzetti and P. Salvadori,
J. Org. Chem., 1993, 58, 7899.
18 I. Paterson, J. M. Goodman, M. A. Lister, R. C. Schumann, C. K.
McClure and R. D. Norcross, Tetrahedron, 1990, 46, 4663.
19 In water, the electroactivity of poly(1b) was weaker and less reversible
than that exhibited in organic electrolyte, probably owing to the
presence of the hydrophobic pinacol moiety.
20 See for example: A. C. Ion, J. C. Moutet, A. Pailleret, A. Popescu, E.
Saint-Aman, E. Siebert and E. M. Ungureanu, J. Electroanal. Chem.,
1999, 464, 24.
Finally, this work constitutes a rare example of function-
alized conducting polymer-based selective anion recognition.
Some parameters, such as the film thickness, and the nature and
length of the spacer arm between the monomer unit and the
Communication 9/05136H
1882
Chem. Commun., 1999, 1881–1882