A R T I C L E S
Hu et al.
Scheme 6. Completion of the C8-C14 Subunit
Scheme 7. C7-C8 Bond Formation through Alkyllithium Addition
was converted to chiral aldehyde 24 by oxidation with the
Dess-Martin reagent,28 completing the synthesis of the C8-
C14 subunit.
selective removal of the primary TBDPS protecting group in
the presence of the secondary TBS ether at C9, which presented
potential problems given the complexity and acid liability of
the molecule.31,32 Gratifyingly, the TBDPS group could be
cleanly removed by 1.0 equiv of tetrabutylammonium fluoride
(TBAF) and provided the primary alcohol 28 in 98% yield with
the C9 TBS ether left intact. In the next important reaction
sequence, the benzylidene acetal of 28 was opened regioselec-
tively in the presence of excess diisobutylaluminum hydride
(DIBAL)33 to afford diol 29 in ∼70% yield, which liberated
the C13 secondary hydroxy.
C7-C8 Bond Formation. With the C1-C7 and C8-C14
subunits in hand, the stage was set to explore conditions to
merge the two subunits. Our first experiments centered on the
direct addition of an organometallic species derived from iodide
12 to aldehyde 24. This option would construct the C7-C8
carbon bond while convergently providing the fully function-
alized C1-C14 polypropionate backbone of the macrolide.
Preliminary experiments revealed that simple nucleophiles,
alkyllithium (MeLi), or Grignard reagents (EtMgBr, n-BuMgCl)
cleanly added to substrate 24 at low temperature. However,
attempts to convert 12 into such species were unsuccessful. The
organolithium derived from 12 by halogen-metal exchange with
tBuLi (2.0 equiv) was itself short-lived and operationally difficult
to handle.29 A diethyl ether or THF solution of the organolithium
intermediate could be maintained at low temperature and added
to aldehyde 24, although low yields (15-20%) of the product
were observed. Attempts to transmetalate the organolithium
derived from 12 with MgBr2, CuCN, or CeCl3 prior to addition
of aldehyde 24 led to poor isolated yields, formation of
byproducts, or decomposition of the starting aldehyde.
After considerable effort, we found that in the solvent system
of Bailey and Punzalan30 (pentane/diethyl ether, 3:2 v/v), the
derived alkyllithium intermediate of 12 condensed with aldehyde
24 at -78 °C and gave 25 as a mixture of diastereomeric
alcohols in 50-60% modest yield. This mixture of secondary
alcohols 25 was oxidized to the ketone by use of the Dess-
Martin reagent, providing 26 in 52% yield (two steps from
aldehyde 24; Scheme 7). Having prepared the C1-C14 carbon
backbone of the natural product, further elaboration to the seco
acid was next pursued.
The conversion of diol 29 to seco acid 33 necessarily required
the selective oxidation of the C1-hydroxy to a carboxylic acid
in the presence of the secondary C13 OH group. Recent
literature precedent had indicated that the use of hindered
chlorooxoammonium salts should be ideal for this process.34
The use of stoichiometric oxoammonium chloride salt 30 for
selective oxidation of compound 29 resulted in a complicated
mixture of products. However, in situ generation of the unstable
salt derived from 4-methoxy-2,2,6,6,tetramethylpiperidine-1-
oxyl (4-methoxy-TEMPO) 31 by a catalytic process proved to
be efficient and produced the desired hydroxy aldehyde 32 in
quantitative yield.35 This material was further oxidized by
sodium chlorite to deliver the seco acid 33 in 99% yield.36
Cyclization and Elaboration of the Macrocycle. Macro-
lactonization of the (9S)-TBS ether 33 was effected under
modified Yamaguchi conditions37 to afford macrolide 34 in
(31) For an excellent review on selective deprotection of silyl ethers, see Nelson,
T. D.; Crouch, R. D. Synthesis, 1996, 1031-1069.
(32) For review on protecting-group strategies in organic synthesis, see
Schelhaas, M.; Waldmann H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 2056-
2083.
(33) (a) Yamamoto, H.; Maruoka, K. Tetrahedron 1988, 44, 5001-5032. (b)
Takano, S.; Akiyama, M.; Sato, S.; Ogasawara, K. Chem. Lett. 1983, 1593-
1596.
(34) For recent review, see DeNooy, A. E. J.; Basemer A. C.; VanBekkum, H.
Synthesis 1996, 1153-1174.
(35) (a) Anelli, P. L.; Biffi, C.; Montanarie, F.; Quici, S. J. Org. Chem. 1987,
52, 2559-2562. (b) Ireland, R. E.; Gleason, J. L.; Gegnas, L. D.; Highsmith,
T. K. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 6856-6872.
(36) Corey, E. J.; Myers, A. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 5574-5576.
(37) (a) Inanaga, J.; Hirata, K.; Saeki, H.; Katsuki, T.; Yamaguchi, M. Bull.
Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1979, 52, 1989-1993. (b) Hikota, M.; Sakurai, Y.; Horita,
K.; Yonemitsu, O. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31, 6367-6370. (c) Hikota,
M.; Tone, H.; Horita, K.; Yonemitsu, O. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 7-9.
Synthesis of the Seco Acid. Olefination of ketone 26 was
undertaken to establish the C8 terminal olefin that would serve
as the precursor to the epoxide. Accordingly, Wittig olefination
with triphenylphosphonium methylide (Ph3PdCH2) cleanly
produced the desired alkene 27 in 95% yield (Scheme 8).
Transformation of the C1-alcohol to a carboxylic acid required
(28) (a) Dess, D. B.; Martin, J. C. J. Org. Chem. 1983, 48, 4155-4156. (b)
Dess, D. B.; Martin, J. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 7277-7287.
t
(29) For a review on the halogen-lithium exchange using BuLi, see Bailey,
W. F.; Patricia, J. J. J. Organomet. Chem. 1988, 352, 1-23.
(30) Bailey, W. F.; Punzalan, E. R. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 5400-5406.
9
12810 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 124, NO. 43, 2002