422
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 422-423
Scheme 2
Solid-Phase Biomimetic Synthesis of Carpanone-like
Molecules
Craig W. Lindsley, Lawrence K. Chan, Brian C. Goess,
Reni Joseph, and Matthew D. Shair*
Department of Chemistry & Chemical Biology
HarVard UniVersity, 12 Oxford St.
Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138
HarVard Institute of Chemistry & Cell Biology
HarVard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02136
ReceiVed October 13, 1999
The advances of split-pool organic synthesis1 and high-
throughput biological screens2 have provided new opportunities
for the discovery of man-made molecules with novel biological
properties. Realization of these new opportunities will be ac-
celerated by the development of solid-phase reactions that
dramatically increase molecular complexity while simultaneously
accessing diverse structures. Biomimetic reactions that mimic
natural product biosyntheses3 are well suited to this approach
because they often convert simple starting materials to complex
structures under mild conditions. While this is an attractive
concept, two significant challenges are (1) developing biomimetic
transformations that access a diverse range of structures and (2)
performing these reactions in the solid-phase. This communication
reports the development of biomimetic reactions in the solid-phase
that result in one-step construction of tetracyclic molecules from
readily accessible starting materials. The reactions are based on
ones implicated in the biosynthesis of carpanone and other
members of the benzoxanthenone class of natural products.4
The biomimetic synthesis of carpanone (Scheme 1, [O] )
PdCl2), first accomplished by Chapman, occurs by diastereose-
lective oxidative homocoupling of an electron-rich o-hydroxy-
styrene followed by rapid endo-selective inverse electron demand
Diels-Alder cycloaddition.5 To broaden the scope of this
those isolated from nature, it was necessary to develop a reaction
that would result in intermolecular oxidative heterodimerization
of dissimilar o-hydroxystyrenes. To our knowledge, this level of
selectivity has not been observed for â,â-phenolic couplings in
natural or laboratory systems.
Our plan involved the use of electronically differentiated
o-hydroxystyrenes (Scheme 2). Under the influence of a suitable
oxidant, the oxidatively more reactive electron-rich phenol 2,
immobilized in the solid-phase to reduce its propensity for
homodimerization, will react preferentially with the oxidatively
less reactive electron-deficient phenol 1 in solution.6 Following
oxidative heterocoupling, inverse electron demand Diels-Alder
transition states 3 and 4 are possible. The electronically preferred
transition state 4 should be favored affording tetracycle 5 directly.7
In a single biomimetic reaction in the solid-phase, tetracyclic
molecules will be constructed with control over five stereocenters
and four initial positions of diversity (R1-R4).
Scheme 1
Initially, we screened a series of oxidants for their ability to
cross-couple electronically differentiated substrates 6 and 78
(Scheme 3). Only PhI(OAc)2 afforded heterocoupled product 8.9
All other oxidants tested resulted in exclusive formation of 9,
resulting from intrabead homocoupling.10 It is interesting to note
that PhI(OAc)2 was the only oxidant in the screen that did not
proceed through a phenoxy radical intermediate.11
Following HF-pyridine promoted removal from the solid-
phase (0.15 mmol/g) a 55% yield of tetracycle 8 was isolated as
a single isomer, resulting from complete electronic control of the
inverse electron demand cycloaddition. The solid-phase reaction
afforded a 1.7:1 ratio of heterocoupled adduct 8 and homocoupled
adduct 9 starting from silicon-linked resin 7 (Entry B). Compound
(6) For intermolecular oxidative biaryl heterocoupling, see: (a) Young, D.
A.; Young, E.; Roux, D. G.; Brandt, E. U.; Ferreira, D. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1 1987, 2345. (b) Hovorka, M.; Gunterova, J.; Zavada, J. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1990, 31, 413.
(7) The preference for transition state 4 is based upon the strong preference
of acrolein for ethyl vinyl ether over itself in an inverse electron demand
heterocycloaddition reaction. For examples, see: Longley, R. I.; Emerson,
W. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1950, 72, 3079.
biomimetic synthesis, with the goal of constructing a split-pool
synthesis library of carpanone-like molecules more diverse than
(1) (a) Furka, A.; Sebestyen, F.; Asgedom, M.; Dibo, G. Int. J. Pept. Protein
Res. 1991, 37, 487-493. (b) Lam, K. S.; Salmon, S. E.; Hersh, E. M.; Hruby,
V. J.; Kazmierski, W. M.; Knapp, R. J. Nature 1991, 354, 82-84. (c) Nicolaou,
K. C.; Pastor, J.; Winssinger, N.; Murphy, F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120,
5132-5133. (d) Tan, D. S.; Foley, M. A.; Shair, M. D.; Schreiber, S. L. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 8565-8566.
(8) Hu, Y.; Porco, J. A., Jr.; Labadie, J. W.; Gooding, O. W. J. Org. Chem.
1998, 63, 4518-4521.
1
(2) For a recent review of high-throughput biological screening, see:
Fernandes, P. B. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 1998, 2, 597-603.
(3) Braun, M. Org. Synth. Highlights 1991, 232-9.
(9) All new compounds were fully characterized by H NMR, 13C NMR,
IR, and HRMS. See the Supporting Information for details.
(10) PdCl2-NaOAc, Co(Salen)-O2, Mn(Salen)-O2, CuCl2-tBuNH2, Fe-
(Salen)-O2, O2-hν-rose bengal, PhI(OCOCF3)2, and VOF3 led exclusively to
homodimerization. Matsumoto, M.; Kuroda, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1981, 22,
4437.
(4) (a) Brophy, G. C.; Mohandas, J.; Slaytor, M.; Sternhell, S.; Watson, T.
R.; Wilson, L. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1969, 10, 5159-5162. (b) Jakupovic, J.;
Eid, F. Phytochemistry 1987, 26, 2427-2429.
(5) Chapman, O. L.; Engel, M. R.; Springer, J. P.; Clardy, J. C. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1971, 93, 6696.
(11) Varvoglis, A. Best Synthetic Methods: HyperValent Iodine in Organic
Synthesis; Academic Press: New York, 1997.
10.1021/ja993674m CCC: $19.00 © 2000 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 12/31/1999