C. Kunick et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 10 (2000) 567±569
Table 1. CDK1/cyclin B inhibition and in vitro antitumor activity
569
a
log10 GI50
Compound
mp (ꢀC)
IC50 CDK1/cyclin B (mM)b
HCT-116 (M)c,d
MGM (M)d,e
1
2
8
9a
9b
9c
10a
10b
11
>330 (1,4-dioxane)
>330 (EtOH)
>330 (EtOH)
>330 (EtOH/toluene)
>330 (EtOH)
>330 (EtOH)
>330 (EtOH)h
>330 (EtOH)i
286 (dec.; EtOH)
0.4
0.4
0.7
4.3
0.32
0.27
0.3
3.2
0.047
5.7/ 5.7
5.4
> 4.0
NAf
5.9/ 5.8g
> 4.0
5.5/ 5.6
5.6/ 5.7
6.1/ 5.7
4.4/ 4.3
4.1
4.07
4.02
5.6/ 5.3g
4.08
4.9/ 4.8
5.7/ 5.6
5.7/ 5.6
4
aGI50=concentration for 50% growth inhibition. The highest concentration used in the in vitro antitumor tests was 10 M.
bTests were carried out in triplicate.
cColon cancer cell line.
dResults of two test runs are separated by a slash.
eMGM=meangraph midpoint.
fNA=not available.
gOne set of test results omitted due to high deviation.
hDecomposition starting at 300 ꢀC.
iDecomposition starting at 275 ꢀC.
9a with respect to 9b, a preliminary computer model
was constructed for the CDK-binding of both com-
pounds showing that the vinyl ketone's end methyl
group of 9b was within the favorable binding region
of the pocket, whereas the vinyl ester's end methyl
group of 9a protrudes into the solvent front to about 1 A
outside the binding site. Thus, the larger entropic
penalty conferred by the slightly bulkier ester may
account for the diminished potency of 9a. In a similar
model, the cyano nitrogen's lone pair of 9c was favor-
ably extended into the solvent. The remarkable increase
in CDK1/cyclin B inhibitory potency of the saturated
analogue 11 with regard to 9c might either be the result
of the higher ¯exibility of the side chain or of the lost
conjugation between the cyano group and the paullone
ring system. As far as 2-substituted paullones of the
present study are concerned, the in vitro antitumor
activity is not paralleling the CDK1 inhibitory property.
Hence, the acrylonitrile-substituted derivative 9c is
nearly inactive as antiproliferative agent, although it
exhibits CDK1 inhibition in submicromolar concentra-
tions. On the other hand, 10b shows lower CDK1 inhi-
bition compared to 9c, but remarkable antitumor
activity. The 2-cyanoethyl derivative 11 satis®es the
main rationale of this study, being a potent CDKl inhi-
bitor as well as an interesting in vitro antitumor agent.
In conclusion, the 2-substitution of the paullones
appears to be a promising strategy for the development
of antiproliferative agents. However, in the course of
future studies it should be taken into consideration that
other targets besides the CDKs might account for the
antiproliferative activity of the paullones.
pour la Recherche sur le Cancer'' (ARC 9314) (to L.M.)
and the ``Conseil Regional de Bretagne'' (to L.M.) and
by a C.N.R.S./NCI collaboration contract. We thank
the ®shermen of the ``Station Biologique de Rosco''
for collecting the star®sh. Computer time and software
was provided, in part, by the Advanced Biomedical
Computing Center, Frederick, MD.
References
1. Morgan, D. O. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 1997, 13, 261.
2. Kamb, A. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 1998, 227, 139.
3. Garrett, M. D.; Fattaey, A. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 1999, 9,
104.
4. Sedlacek, H. H.; Czech, J.; Naik, R.; Kaur, G.; Worland, P.;
Losiewicz, M.; Parker, B.; Carlson, B.; Smith, A.; Sender-
owicz, A.; Sausville, E. Int. J. Oncol. 1996, 9, 1143.
5. Sausville, E. A.; Zaharevitz, D.; Gussio, R.; Meijer, L.;
Louarn-Leost, M.; Kunick, C.; Schultz, R.; Lahusen, T.;
Headlee, D.; Stinson, S.; Arbuck, S. G.; Senderowicz, A.
Pharmacol. Ther. 1999, 82, 285.
6. Zaharevitz, D. W.; Gussio, R.; Leost, M.; Senderowicz, A.;
Lahusen, T.; Kunick, C.; Meijer, L.; Sausville, E. A. Cancer
Res. 1999, 59, 2566.
7. Schultz, C.; Link, A.; Leost, M.; Zaharevitz, D. W.; Gussio,
R.; Sausville, E. A.; Meijer, L.; Kunick, C. J. Med. Chem.
1999, 42, 2909.
8. Kunick, C. Arch. Pharm. (Weinheim) 1991, 324, 579.
9. Kunick, C. Arch. Pharm. (Weinheim) 1992, 325, 297.
10. Dieck, H. A.; Heck, R. F. J. Org. Chem. 1975, 93, 259.
11. Pro®tt, J. A.; Watts, D. S.; Corey, E. J. J. Org. Chem.
1975, 40, 127.
12. Sonogashira, K.; Tohda, Y.; Hagihara, N. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1975, 50, 4467.
13. Boyd, M. R.; Paull, K. D. Drug Dev. Res. 1995, 34, 91.
14. Monks, A.; Scudiero, D. A.; Johnson, G. S.; Paull, K. D.;
Sausville, E. A. Anti-Cancer Drug Des. 1997, 12, 533.
15. Paull, K. D.; Shoemaker, R. H.; Hodes, L.; Monks, A.;
Scudiero, D. A.; Rubinstein, L.; Plowman, J.; Boyd, M. R. J.
Natl. Cancer Inst. 1989, 81, 1088.
Acknowledgements
The generous support by Professor D. Geken and the
University of Hamburg is gratefully acknowledged. This
research was supported by grants from the ``Association