Notes
J . Org. Chem., Vol. 64, No. 22, 1999 8377
a
+
Ta ble 4. Ra te Con sta n ts for Elim in a tion fr om (E)-2,4-(NO2)2C6H3CHdNOC(O)C6H5 P r om oted by i-P r 2NH/i-P r 2NH2 in
70% MeCN(a q) a t 25.0 °Cb
102[buffer],c M
103kobs d,e s-1s
0.200
0.138
0.400
0.245
0.600
0.347
1.00
0.530
1.40
0.696
1.80
0.839
3.00
1.18
5.00
1.66
10.0
3.69
,
a
b
d
[Substrate] ) 4.0 × 10-5 M. Ionic strength ) 1.0 M (Bu4N+Br-). c Buffer ratio ) 1.0. Average of three or more rate constants.
e Estimated uncertainty, (3%.
Sch em e 1
of the â-aryl groups should be nearly orthogonal to the
developing negative charge at the â-carbon in the transi-
tion state.20 This would predict that the electronic effect
of the â-substituent should be transmitted to the reaction
site only through an inductive effect. Furthermore, the
negative charge density developed on the â-carbon would
be less sensitive to the substituent effect because it
should be more stable than that on a sp3 hybridized
carbon atom. It appears that the nitrile-forming transi-
tion states are intrinsically insensitive to the reactant
structure variations because of the lack of resonance
stabilization of charge density on the â-carbon and the
increased carbanion stabilizing ability of the sp2-hybrid-
ized â-carbon atom.
Ta ble 5. Rela tive Ra te, Br o1n sted â, a n d âlg Va lu es for
Elim in a tion s fr om (E)-YC6H4CHdNO(O)C6H4X
Y ) Ha
DBU-MeCNb
19.4
Y ) 2,4-(NO2)2
base-solvent
R2NH-MeCN
18.5c
10
0.47 ( 0.04
-0.35 ( 0.02
pKa
relative rated
1
âd
âlg
>0.5e
-0.49 ( 0.02
Exp er im en ta l Section
a
b
Reference 12. DBU ) 1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene.
c R2NH ) i-Pr2NH. X ) H. e Estimated from kH/kD ) 3.3 (see
d
Mater ials. (E)-2,4-Dinitrobenzaldehyde O-benzoyloximes 1a-d
were synthesized by the reaction of (E)-2,4-dinitrobenzalde-
hydeoxime with benzoyl chlorides, as described elsewhere.11,12
The spectral and analytical data for the compounds were
consistent with the proposed structures. The yield, melting point,
IR (KBr, cm-1), NMR (CDCl3, J values are given in Hz), and
combustion analysis data for the new compounds follow.
(E)-2,4-(NO2)2C6H3CHdNOC(O)C6H5 (1a ): yield 70%; mp
172-174 °C; IR 1759 (CdO), 1589 (CdN); NMR δ 9.22 (s, 1H),
9.02 (d, 1H, J ) 2.4), 8.57 (dd, 1H, J ) 8.7, 2.3), 8.48 (d, 1H, J
) 8.4), 8.15 (d, 2H, J ) 8.4), 7.66 (t, 1H, J ) 7.3), 7.53 (t, 2H, J
) 7.8). Anal. Calcd for C14H9N3O6: C, 53.34; H, 2.88; N, 13.33.
Found: C, 53.20; H, 2.56; N,13.70.
(E)-2,4-(NO2)2C6H3CHdNOC(O)C6H4-p-OCH3 (1a ): yield
56%; mp 158 °C; IR 1748 (CdO), 1600 (CdN); NMR δ 9.21 (s,
1H), 9.03 (d, 1H, J ) 2.4), 8.57 (dd, 1H, J ) 8.7, 2.3), 8.50 (d,
1H, J ) 8.4), 8.12 (d, 2H, J ) 8.6), 7.01 (d, 2H, J ) 8.6), 3.91 (s,
3H). Anal. Calcd for C15H11N3O7: C, 52.18; H, 3.21; N, 12.17.
Found: C, 52.23; H, 3.18; N,12.17.
(E)-2,4-(NO2)2C6H3CHdNOC(O)C6H4-m -Br (1c): yield 56%;
mp 178 °C; IR 1756 (CdO), 1582 (CdN); NMR δ 9.25 (s, 1H),
9.05 (d, 1H, J ) 2.1), 8.59 (dd, 1H, J ) 8.7, 2.3), 8.47 (d, 1H, J
) 8.7), 8.30 (s, 1H), 8.10 (d, 1H, J ) 7.8), 7.80 (d, 1H, J ) 7.2),
7.42 (t, 1H, J ) 7.7). Anal. Calcd for C14H8BrN3O6: C, 42.66; H,
2.05; N, 10.66. Found: C, 42.86; H, 2.13; N, 10.70.
(E)-2,4-(NO2)2C6H3CHdNOC(O)C6H4-p-NO2 (1d): yield 62%;
mp 172-174 °C; IR 1763 (CdO), 1589 (CdN); NMR δ 9.27 (s,
1H), 9.06 (d, 1H, J ) 2.4), 8.61 (dd, 1H, J ) 8.4, 2.3), 8.46 (d,
1H, J ) 8.4), 8.39 (d, 2H, J ) 8.9), 8.35 (d, 2H, J ) 8.9). Anal.
Calcd for C14H8N4O8: C, 46.68; H, 2.24; N, 15.55. Found: C,
46.80; H, 2.12; N, 15.29.
text).
kobs ) k2 when k-1[BH+] . k2. Hence the straight line
observed in Figure 1 provides strong evidence that the
reaction proceeds by the E2 mechanism even under with
additional favoring conditions for the E1cb mechanism.
E ffect of â-Ar yl Gr ou p on t h e Nit r ile-F or m in g
Tr a n sition Sta te. Table 5 shows that the rate of
elimination from 1a is only 10-fold faster than that from
the unsubstituted (E)-benzaldehyde O-benzoyloxime. Al-
though this result may in part be attributed to the
weaker basicity of i-Pr2NH than DBU, the difference is
surprisingly small considering the large difference in the
electron-withdrawing ability of the â-aryl substituent.11
Comparison of the transition-state parameters reveals
that the structure of the transition states for these two
reactions are also similar. It was previously reported that
the DBU-promoted elimination from (E)-benzaldehyde
O-benzoyloxime proceed via a slightly E1cb-like transi-
tion state, in which the Câ-H bond cleavage has pro-
gressed to a greater extent than the NR-OAr bond
rupture.11,12 Although a direct comparison between the
kH/kD and â values is not possible, â ) 0.47 for elimination
from 1 appears to indicate a smaller extent of proton
transfer than the kH/kD ) 3.3 value for the former since
the latter was attributed to more than half proton
transfer.11,12 In addition, the smaller |âlg| value for the
former can also be explained with a lesser degree of NR-
OAr bond cleavage. These results indicate that the
transition state for elimination from 1 is slightly more
reactant-like with lesser extents of Câ-H and NR-OAr
bond cleavage. However, it should be noted that the
difference is remarkably small considering the large
difference in the â-aryl substituent.
Buffer solutions were prepared by dissolving equivalent
+
amounts of i-Pr2NH and i-Pr2NH2 in 70% MeCN(aq). In all
cases, the ionic strength was maintained at 0.10 M with
Bu4N+Br-.
P r od u ct Stu d ies. The products of the reaction between 1a
and i-Pr2NH in MeCN were identified using a more concentrated
solution. A solution of 1a was allowed to react with 10 equiv of
i-Pr2NH in 15 mL of MeCN for 3 h at room temperature. The
solvent was evaporated, and the product was taken up in CH2-
Cl2. The solution was washed thoroughly with water, dried over
MgSO4, and evaporated. The product was 2,4-dinitrobenzonitrile
with mp 105 °C (lit.21 mp 104-5 °C); yield 0.36 g (93%).
The small difference in the transition-state structures
may be attributed to the geometry of the reactant
structure. It has been well established that the benzal-
doxime esters have planar structures.11,12,20 Hence, if the
planarity is retained in the transition state, the π orbitals
(21) Dictionary of Organic Compounds; Mack Printing Co.: Easton,
PA, 1982; Vol. 2, p 2258.
(22) Coetzee, J . F. Prog. Phys. Org, Chem. 1965, 4, 45-92.
(23) Cho, B. R.; Lee, S. J .; Kim, Y. K. J . Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 2072-
2076.
(20) Cho, B. R.; Cho, N. S.; Song, S. H.; Lee, S. K. J . Org. Chem.
1998, 63, 8304-8309.