Table 1. Intermolecular Hydroamination with Tunable Bis(amidate)titanium-Bis(amido) Precatalysts
t
% yield
entry
R
(h)
(anti-Markovnikov/Markovnikov)a
1
2
3
4
5
iPr
tBu
Ph
24
24
24
10
6
no reaction
71 (5:1)
55 (99:1)
78 (>99:1)
82 (>99:1)
2,6-dimethylphenyl
2,6-diisopropylphenyl
1
a Yields were determined by H NMR with an internal standard (1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene). Ratio confirmed by GCMS after hydrolysis.
tage of the low cost and high reactivity of the group 4 metals
while providing enhanced and selective reactivity remains
an area of intense investigation.5 Inspired by the work of
Beller and co-workers, who reported titanium-catalyzed anti-
Markovnikov hydroamination with bulky amine substrates,2a
we sought to develop a flexible catalyst system based on
readily available amidate ligands to afford easily prepared
complexes with broadly applicable reactivity.
anhydrous ether, followed by removal of all volatiles to give
a red microcrystalline solid (eq 1). These crude materials
were used in a preliminary screen to identify the most active
precatalyst for the hydroamination of 1-hexyne with tert-
butylamine (Table 1). These reactions were carried out on
NMR tube scale at 65 °C for up to 24 h. The reaction
progress was monitored by 1H NMR spectroscopy by
observing the disappearance of the terminal alkyne proton
at 2.1 ppm and the appearance of the diagnostic signals for
the aldimine anti-Markovnikov product (triplet at 7.5 ppm)
and the ketimine Markovnikov product (singlet at 1.9 ppm).
As shown in Table 1, the easily modified amide proligand
permits the preparation of complexes displaying tunable
relative reactivity. The bulkiest substituent is the most
effective, with the 2,6-diisopropylphenyl derivative (entry
5, complex 1) resulting in the highest yields and lowest
reaction times. Most importantly, the most active precatalyst
was also highly regioselective with only the anti-
Markovnikov product being observed.
Complex 1 was recrystallized from benzene and was fully
characterized, including X-ray crystallographic analysis
(Figure 1). The bis(amidate)titanium complex is C2 sym-
metric, with the N atoms of the amidate ligands being trans
to each other, while the amide ligands are in a cis orientation.
The crystalline precatalyst has catalytic behavior identical
to that of the bulk material; thus, the easily isolated crude
product was used for all catalytic investigations.
Organic amides are attractive proligands, as they have an
easily modified structure that allows for variable steric and
electronic properties in the resultant complexes. Surprisingly,
amidates have been rarely employed as auxiliary ligands in
transition metal chemistry.6 We are investigating this easily
varied N,O chelating ligand as a flexible scaffold for the
preparation of highly selective and reactive catalysts. Previ-
ously we reported that varying the electronic properties of
the amidate ligand while maintaining consistent steric
properties could dramatically modify reactivity.7 However,
these preliminary catalyst systems had limited substrate
tolerance. Here we probe the effect of the steric environment
about the reactive metal center by changing the substituents
on the N of the amidate ligand. In particular, the catalyst
identified gives unprecedented anti-Markovnikov selectivity
for a wide range of substrates with various steric properties
and functional groups. The reactive aldimine products
generated have been further elaborated using one-pot pro-
cedures to give substituted amines, aldehydes, and a more
complex structural motif, the isoquinoline framework.
Consistent with previously reported mechanistic investiga-
tions for titanium catalyzed hydroamination,9 we propose
titanium-imido species as the catalytically active complexes.
This is supported by the observation that the bis(amidate)
(5) (a) Ackermann, L.; Bergman, R. G.; Loy, R. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2003, 125, 11956. (b) Shi, Y.; Hall, C.; Ciszewski, J. T.; Cao, C.; Odom,
A. L. Chem. Commun. 2003, 586. (c) Ong, T.-G.; Yap, G. A. P.; Richeson,
D. S. Organometallics 2002, 21, 2839.
(6) Giesbrecht, G. R.; Shafir, A.; Arnold, J. Inorg. Chem. 2001, 40, 6069.
(7) Li, C.; Thomson, R. K.; Gillon, B.; Patrick, B. O.; Schafer, L. L.
Chem. Commun. 2003, 2562.
The precatalysts described here were prepared by the
reaction of 2 equiv of amide with 1 equiv of Ti(NEt2)4 in
(8) See Supporting Information for relevant bond lengths and angles.
(9) (a) Johnson, J. S.; Bergman, R. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123,
2923. (b) Pohlki, F.; Doye, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 2305. (c)
Fairfax, D.; Stein, M.; Livinghouse, T.; Jensen, M. Organometallics 1997,
16, 1523.
(4) (a) Walsh, P. J.; Baranger, A.; Bergman, R. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1992, 114, 1708. (b) Haak, E.; Bytschkov, I.; Doye, S. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 1999, 38, 3389. (c) Pohlki, F.; Heutling, A.; Bytschkov, I.; Hotopp, T.;
Doye, S. Synlett 2002, 799.
4734
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 24, 2003