wash were made. Fig. 2 shows strong binding to the NAD
treated slides, with a residual SPR angle increase of 47 ± 3° (N
= 3) and very little evidence of desorption. No overall change
in SPR angle was observed for injection of LDH if the NAD was
not present. This would support the binding of NAD via its diol
groups to the surface, leaving the binding regions, at the adenine
and nicotinamide units, available for LDH and a range of other
dehydrogenases.15
In summary, this report describes a novel self-assembling
boronic acid derivative with the potential to specifically interact
with vicinal diol groups found within a range of nucleotides,
saccharides, antibiotics and other systems. It has been shown
that with a clean environment, formation of a correctly
orientated layer on the surface is achieved and that vicinal diol
containing species attach strongly only to the modified surface.
Further, enzyme–cofactor binding has been demonstrated as
part of a multilayer system, potentially opening new avenues for
enzyme studies, via a relatively simple attachment route,
applicable to a range of novel analysis tools such as SPR and
QCM.
Fig. 2 SPR angle change for the binding of NAD (1 mg m21) to a gold
substrate previously treated with 4 followed by lactate dehydrogenase (1 3
1026 M) (flow rate = 4 ml min21, T = 30 °C, pH 7.2 Sorensons PBS).
Increases in SPR angle equate to material attachment to the
substrate surface. Non-linear regression using a four parameter,
double exponential rise relationship to the SPR data gave R =
0.99 and rate constants, K1 = 1.1 3 1023 s21 and K2 = 6.91
3 1023 s21.The value of the measured K1 is of the order found
by Debono et al.,14 (4.3 3 1023 s21) with SPR for the
adsorption of dodecanethiol from ethanolic solution at an equal
concentration. These results follow the distinct two step
adsorption process found by DeBono et al.14 and Bain et al.12
The results show a very fast initial step lasting a few minutes
giving rise to an 80–90% monolayer coverage, followed by a
slower step lasting between minutes and hours depending upon
the structure of the thiol, in which time the monolayer
reorganises and completes its formation.
A similar two stage adsorption profile was observed upon the
exposure of a 10 MHz lapped quartz crystal, thickness shear
mode sensor with gold electrodes to a 1 mM ethanolic solution
of the compound. A total frequency decrease of 126 Hz was
recorded over an 8 h period for a single electrode in contact with
the solution. The increased time required for the adsorption
process to reach equilibrium is thought to be due to surface
roughness; 2–3 mm troughs are found in the lapped crystal
surface compared to the sub-micron polished surface used for
SPR analysis.
Surface functionality of the adsorbed boronic acid SAM was
further confirmed by contact angle and SPR experiments. Gold
coated slides, previously exposed to the monolayer forming
solution, with contact angles measuring 37 ± 2° (N = 6), were
placed in a 1 mg ml21 solution of nicotinamide adenine
dinucleotide (NAD) in Sorenson’s buffer, pH 7.2. Following a
15 min incubation at 30 °C the slides were removed, washed
with further buffer, dried and the water contact angle measured
as described previously. A further decrease in angle was
recorded [27 ± 1.0° (N = 6)], suggesting that binding of the
NAD to the surface may have occurred.
Real time analysis of NAD binding (Fig. 2) was carried out
using SPR. NAD (1 mg ml21) in a buffer stream was passed
over a boronic acid treated gold slide (4 ml s21). A residual SPR
angle increase of 40 ± 2 millidegrees, (N = 3) verified that
NAD had bound to the boronic acid layer. A similar profile was
observed for lactose and maltose with SPR angle increases of 32
± 3 (N = 3) and 24 ± 2° (N = 3) respectively. No residual
change in SPR angle was observed when untreated gold
surfaces were similarly challenged.
The authors wish to dedicate this paper to the memory of Dr
Jim Baker who passed away prior to submission. We thank the
EPSRC and SmithKline Beecham for financial support under
the CASE award scheme, Award #G77.
Notes and references
†
Selected data for 4: dH[250 MHz, CDCl3–DMSO-d6 (1+1)]1.3
(CH3CO2H), 2.1, 2.3, 2.5 (CH2), 3.0 (H2O), 2.6, 3.4 (CH2S), 7.1, 7.4, 7.6
(dd, CH aromatic), 9.0 (NH), 9.1 (CH3CO2H).
‡ LC/MS (Finnigan LCQ) yielded a single species of m/z (H+) 254.300 at a
retention time of 15.61 min comparable to the calculated mass of 254.101
(C11H16BNO3S).
§ FTIR analysis on a Perkin-Elmer 1720 spectrophotometer, resolution 4
cm21, 20 scans.
1 L. Deng, M. Mrksich and G. Whitesides, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1996, 118,
5136.
2 A. Ulman, Chem. Rev., 1996, 96, 1533 and references cited therin.
3 N. Nakashima and T. Taguchi, Colloids Surf., 1995, 103, 159.
4 K. T. Kinnear and H. G. Monbouquette, in Biosensor and chemical
sensor technology, ACS, Washington, 1995, p. 82.
5 S. Storri, T. Santoni, M. Minunni and M. Mascini, Biosens. Bio-
electron., 1998, 13, 347.
6 J. A. Riggs, R. K. Litchfield and B. D. Smith, J. Org. Chem., 1996, 61,
1148.
7 T. James, K. R. A. Samankumara Sansanayake and S. Shinkai, Nature,
1995, 374, 345.
8 S. Shinkai, K. Tsukagoshi, Y. Ishikawa and T. Kunitake, J. Chem. Soc.,
Chem. Commun., 1991, 15, 1039.
9 L. Vignon, Compt. Rend., 1874, 78, 148.
10 T. D. James, K. R. A. Samankumara Sansanayake and S. Shinkai,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1996, 35, 1910.
11 T. Kuivila, J. Org. Chem., 1954, 19, 780.
12 C. D. Bain, E. B. Troughton, T. Y. Tao, J. Evall, G. M. Whitesides and
R. G. Nuzzo, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1989, 111, 321.
13 A. L. Plant, M. Brigham-Burke, E. C. Petrella and D. J. O’Shannessy,
Anal. Biochem., 1995, 226, 342.
14 R. F. Debono, G. D. Loucks, D. D. Manna and U. J. Krull, Can. J.
Chem., 1996, 74, 677.
15 L. Stryer, Biochemistry, 4th edn., W. H. Freeman, New York, 1995, p.
498.
After treatment of the SPR slides with NAD, injections of
lactate dehydrogenase (1 3 1026M, LDH), followed by a buffer
Communication 9/06542C
2224
Chem. Commun., 1999, 2223–2224