1566
J . Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 1566-1568
Ta ble 1. Rea ction of Eth oxyca r bon yl Isoth iocya n a te
A Ver sa tile On e-P ot Syn th esis of
1,3-Su bstitu ted Gu a n id in es fr om
Ca r ba m oyl Isoth iocya n a tes
w ith Va r iou s Am in es To F or m Th iou r ea 2 a n d
Gu a n id in e 3
Brian R. Linton,† Andrew J . Carr,‡
Brendan P. Orner,‡ and Andrew D. Hamilton*,‡,§
Department of Chemistry, University of Pittsburgh,
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260, and Sterling Chemistry
Laboratory, Box 208107, Yale University,
New Haven, Connecticut 06520
Received September 15, 1999
Recent advances have demonstrated the importance
of the guanidine group in receptors capable of binding
molecular anions.1,2 The need for more complex receptors
required a new protocol for creating highly substituted
guanidines under mild conditions. Several new methods
have been developed that use carbamate protection to
reduce the basicity of guanidines, simplifying purifica-
tion.3-8 While these methods permit the mild guanidi-
nylation of amines to form monosubstituted guanidines,
most do not allow the formation of highly functionalized
guanidines. Synthesis of multisubstituted guanidines has
been accomplished primarily with unprotected isothio-
uronium salts9 or imino carbonates10 or using protocols
requiring treatment with strong base.11-13 We wished to
take advantage of the benefits of carbamate-protected
guanidines, but with a protocol that allowed the forma-
tion of 1,3-multisubstituted guanidines from two separate
amines.
% yield of guanidine 3
% yield
of thiourea 2
amine
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
A
B
C
D
E
F
99
99
99
99
92
77
72
99
99
0
99
74
0
95
59
0
76
55
0
92
99
0
82
99
0
85
65
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
99
96
85
87
99
76
99
61
99
81
84
42
95
98
35
97
67
34
34
39
0
G
provide a protecting group throughout the synthesis,
making purification trivial, without the later inclusion
of a protection step. The carbamate increases the reactiv-
ity of the isothiocyanate, permitting formation of thiourea
2 even with hindered amines. A second amine can be
coupled to the carbamoyl thiourea 2 using EDCI,4 form-
ing 1,3-disubstituted and 1,1,3-trisubstituted guanidines
through either stepwise or one-pot synthesis.
To gauge the steric and electronic limitations of this
procedure, amines of varying reactivity (A-G) were
investigated for their ability to form protected thiourea
2 and guanidine 3. The synthetic yields for this series of
reactions with ethoxycarbonyl isothiocyanate and amines
A-G are shown in Table 1. Formation of thiourea 2
proceeded in near quantitative yields for alkylamines (A-
D), while aromatic amines (E-G) produced slightly lower
yields. Each amine has a dual effect on guanidine
synthesis: reactivity of the amine with various thioureas
as well as coupling efficiency of the thiourea formed from
that amine. Both showed a steric effect as yields de-
creased with bulkier substituents. Most noticeably, both
thioureas formed from secondary amines (2C and 2D)
failed to form guanidines in detectable yields. It is
unclear if this results from increased steric bulk limiting
nucleophile attack or from the removal of a reactive
proton. Trisubstituted guanidines can be formed, how-
ever, through the coupling of unencumbered thioureas
with secondary amines, albeit in lower yields than with
primary amines. Aromatic amines were also successful
in both aspects of guanidinylation, with both phenyl-
amine and the more sterically hindered 2-methoxy-
phenylamine producing guanidinium in good yields. The
electronic nature of the 4-nitrophenylamine reduces the
efficiency of the reaction of this amine to form guanidine
as well as the coupling with the corresponding thiourea,
producing lower yields in each case.
This procedure, shown in eq 1, exploits several advan-
tages of carbamoyl isothiocyanates 1. These reagents
(1)
† University of Pittsburgh.
‡ Sterling Chemistry Laboratory.
§ Phone: (203)432-5570.Fax: (203)432-6144.Email: Andrew.Hamilton@
yale.edu.
(1) Linton, B.; Hamilton, A. D. Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 6027-6038.
(2) Schmidtchen, F. P.; Berger, M. Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 1609-1646.
(3) Yong, Y. F.; Kowalski, J . A.; Lipton, M. A. J . Org. Chem. 1997,
62, 1540-1542. Employing Mukaiyama’s reagent in this protocol was
unsuccessful, suggesting the singly protected thioureas are less reactive
than the bis-carbamoyl thioureas used in the Lipton study.
(4) Poss, M. A.; Iwanowicz, E.; Reid, J . A.; Lin, J .; Gu, Z. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1992, 33, 5933-5936.
(5) Bernatowicz, M. S.; Wu, Y.; Matsueda, G. R. Tetrahedron Lett.
1993, 34, 3389-3392.
(6) Kim, K. S.; Qian, L. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34, 7677-7680.
(7) Dodd, D. S.; Kozikowski, A. P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 977-
980.
(8) Robinson, S.; Roskamp, E. J . Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 6697-6705.
(9) Rasmussen, C. R.; Villani, F. J .; Weaner, L. E.; Reynolds, B. E.;
Hood, A. R.; Hecker, L. R.; Nortey, S. O.; Hanslin, A.; Costanzo, M. J .;
Powell, E. T.; Molinari, A. J . Synthesis 1988, 460-466. Wilson, L. J .;
Klopfenstein, S. R.; Li, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 3999-4002.
(10) Schlama, T.; Gouerneur, V.; Valleix, A.; Greiner, A.; Toupet,
L.; Mioskowski, C. J . Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 4200-4202.
(11) Knieps, S.; Michel, M. C.; Dove, S.; Buschauer, A. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. Lett. 1995, 5, 2065-2070.
The generality of this procedure for other carbamoyl
isothiocyanates allows synthetic flexibility in the final
(12) Corelli, F.; Dei, D.; Monache, G. D.; Botta, B.; DeLuca, C.;
Carmignani, M.; Volpe, A. R.; Botta, M. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1996,
6, 653-658.
(13) Of notable exception is the method of Dodd and Wallace (Dodd,
D.; Wallace, O. B. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 5701-5704) which
permits the solid-phase synthesis of N,N′-disubstituted guanidines.
10.1021/jo991458q CCC: $19.00 © 2000 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 02/17/2000