“attacks” at the â-position with respect to the chiral auxiliary.
In our case, however, the nucleophile comes in at the
R-position, implying that the chiral auxiliary is even closer
to the reaction center (Scheme 3).
Scheme 2. Elimination-Addition Reaction
This anomalous behavior can be attributed to the electron-
withdrawing effect of the dienone functionality, resulting in
an electron deficiency at the R-carbon atom. A nucleophilic
attack at this carbon atom results in aromatization of the
dienone group, which explains the high reactivity of inter-
mediate 3. To study the diastereoselectivity, esters derived
from three different chiral alcohols have been investigated
as chiral auxiliaries (Scheme 4). The syntheses of 5a-c were
Even after the addition of a nonnucleophilic base and in the
absence of potential nucleophiles, 3 could not be isolated.
A one-pot approach in THF as the solvent, in which the
reactive intermediate 3 is trapped with an amine in an
elimination-addition reaction, proved to be very successful.
Six different amines have been introduced using this
procedure, as summarized in Table 1.
Scheme 4. Elimination-Addition Reaction Using Chiral
Auxiliaries
Table 1. Results of the One-Pot Elimination-Addition
Reaction Using Six Different Amines
entry
R1
R2
equiv
base
yield (%)
a
b
c
d
e
f
H
H
H
H
H
H
excess
10
10
10
10
NH3
DBU
DBU
DBU
DBU
DBU
80-90
95
100
99
92
87
CH2Ph
(CH2)3CH3
C6H11
C(CH3)3
piperidine
10
For the synthesis of HPG (entry a), 2 was dissolved in
THF and added to liquid ammonia at -30 °C. The presence
of THF appeared to be essential, because in its absence no
addition product was formed. Apparently, THF is beneficial
for the nucleophilicity of the amine. In the synthesis of 4a
no additional base was required to eliminate the carbonate
group. The reactions with benzylamine, n-butylamine, cy-
clohexylamine, tert-butylamine, and piperidine (entries b-f)
were performed at 0 °C with 10 equiv of the amines and
required a small amount of DBU (5-10 mol %) as a catalyst
to initiate the elimination of the carbonate group. These
elimination-addition reactions went to completion in a few
hours in very high yield. Using a lesser amount of amine,
e.g., 5 equiv, resulted in a minor decrease in the yield of the
corresponding addition products, whereas less than 3 equiv
resulted in a substantial decrease.
performed in a manner analogous to the sequence shown in
Scheme 1, using the corresponding acetate derived from the
chiral auxiliaries a-c in the 1,2-nucleophilic addition reaction
to p-benzoquinone (yields 80-90%). Two different nucleo-
philes have been studied in the elimination-addition reaction,
i.e., ammonia and benzylamine. The reactions were per-
formed under the same conditions as described above. The
reactions with ammonia, however, required considerable
longer reaction times, up to 10 h. The results are summarized
in Scheme 4. The bornyl group (a) did not show any
diastereoselectivity, which is in line with the rather poor
inducting capabilitiy of this group. The menthyl group (b),
however, gave a diastereoselectivity of 15-20%. In this
study, the best results were obtained using the 8-phenyl-
menthyl group (c) as a chiral auxiliary. The shielding effect
of the additional phenyl group apparently is quite effective,
resulting in a diastereoselectivity of 60%. Fine-tuning of the
chiral auxiliary might result in a further improvement of the
diastereoselectivity, which is currently under investigation.
In addition to the abovementioned synthesis of 4, we also
studied the diastereoselectivity in this elimination-addition
reaction using a chiral acetate ester. It should be noted that
this is a special case of the Michael addition reaction
(Scheme 3). In a regular Michael addition, the nucleophile
Scheme 3. R-Michael Addition vs â-Michael Addition
Benzylamine appeared to be a very effective nucleophile.
The yields of the addition products were in all cases very
high. However, the addition of ammonia was less effective
as a result of its poor nucleophilicity.
474
Org. Lett., Vol. 2, No. 4, 2000