was purified by flash chromatography with 3:5 ethyl acetate/
hexanes to give a colorless light oil (0.156 g, 70%): 1H NMR-
(CDCl3, 300 MHz) δ 7.82, 7.70 (d, 3H), 7.34-7.16 (m, 5H), 4.70
(s, 2H), 3.48 (s, 2H), 2.94 (s, 3H), 2.89-2.79 (m, 1H), 2.62-2.48
(m, 2H), 1.9-1.81 (m, 2H), 1.29-1.25 (d, 3H).
electron capture conditions (see below). Fifth, the electrophoric
3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)benzyl moiety makes our reagent easy to
handle (UV-active and nonvolatile at room temperature) and is
itself chemically inert.
As shown in Figure 2, true or model analytes for oxidative
sugar damage, glycolate (1 ), 3-hydroxy-2-butanone (2 ), 3-phenyl-
butyraldehyde (3), and R-hydroxy-γ-butyrolactone (4a) were each
tagged with AMACE1 by a direct nucleophilic (4 ), Schiff base/
NaCNBH3 (2 , 3 ), or carbodiimide-induced (1 , 4 b) reaction,
followed by reaction with butyric anhydride at residual active
hydrogen sites, to form electrophores 5 -8 . The reactions were
conducted at the milligram level, and TLC showed essentially
complete conversion of starting material to product in each case;
isolated yields for the products were g60%.
Shown in Figure 3 is a GC/ EC-MS chromatogram obtained
by injecting a mixture containing 10 fg each of the products
(ranging from 18 to 23 amol) as diluted standards. To obtain this
multiple selected ion chromatogram, four ions were monitored,
one for each of the analytes, on the basis of the intended,
dissociative electron capture. In part, high sensitivity is achieved
since the electron capture behavior of each derivative (full-scan
data not shown) is dominated by the characteristic ion that is
monitored in Figure 3.
Butyrylation of 1 5 , Yielding 7 . Compound 7 was prepared
from 1 5 in the same way that 8 was prepared from 1 4 , yielding
product as a colorless light oil (0.136 g, 66%): 1H NMR (CDCl3,
300 MHz) δ 7.83-7.70 (d, 3H), 7.32-7.19 (m, 5H), 4.67 (s, 2H),
4.14-3.98 (m, 2H), 3.36-3.25 (m, 2H), 3.62-3.60 (d, 3H), 2.72-
2.66 (m, 1H), 2.36-2.31 (t, 2H), 2.10-2.05 (m, 2H), 1.89-1.81
(m, 2H), 1.72-1.57 (m, 2H), 1.32-1.30 (d, 3H), 1.01-0.98 (t, 3H).
Attachment of AMACE1 to 3 -Hydroxy-2 -butanone (2 ) by
Reductive Amination, Yielding 1 6 . Compound 1 6 was pre-
pared from 2 in the same way that 1 5 was prepared from 3 ,
yielding a colorless light oil (0.115 g, 62%): 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300
MHz) δ 7.85-7.72 (d, 3H), 4.74 (s, 2H), 4.15-4.10 (m, 1H), 3.66
(s, 2H), 3.00 (s, 3H), 3.09-2.99 (m, 1H), 1.58-1.55 (d, 3H), 1.46-
1.40 (d, 3H).
Butyrylation of 1 6 , Yielding 6 . Compound 6 was prepared
from 1 6 in the same way that 8 was prepared from 1 4 except
the reaction temperature was raised to 60-65 °C, yielding a
colorless light oil (0.183 g, 61%): 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) δ
7.85-7.70 (d, 3H), 4.96-4.91 (m, 1H), 4.82-4.59 (q, 2H), 4.32-
3.70 (q, 2H), 4.11-4.03 (m, 1H), 3.08-3.05 (d, 3H), 2.99 (s, 3H),
2.46-2.11 (m, 3H), 1.78-1.63 (m, 4H), 1.31-1.28 (d, 4H), 1.03-
0.90 (m, 6H).
Since the AMACE1 labeling reactions are all conducted in
water under mild, similar conditions, potentially they can be
conducted sequentially in the same vial. Work on this is in
progress, along with effort to perform the overall analysis on
oxidized sugar analytes at the trace level starting with a biological
sample.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Prior to selecting butyrylation as a way to remove residual
active hydrogens (NH and OH) in the intermediate products
derived from the labeling reaction with AMACE1, we explored
pivaloylation and acetylation. The former reaction gave high yields
of product from compounds 1 3 -1 5 , but the yield from 1 6 was
very low, apparently for steric reasons. Acetylation gave good
yields in all cases, but the acetyl products tailed more than the
pivaloyl products by GC/ MS. Butyrylation provided high yields
throughout, and the peak shapes of the products were similar to
those of the pivaloyl derivatives.
Other sugar and sugar-related analytes contain one or more
of the functional groups that can be labeled by AMACE1, and so
do other kinds of small analytes. AMACE1 should be useful in
general for trace organic analysis, given the above-cited advan-
tages including the aqueous coupling conditions.
AMACE1 (1 2 ) was prepared by the scheme shown in Figure
1. As seen, N-tritylglycine was coupled to 3′,5′-bis(trifluoromethyl)-
benzylamine using 1-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-3-ethylcarbodiimide
hydrochloride, triethylamine, and 1-hydroxybenzotriazole in dim-
ethylformamide (87% yield), followed by methylation with methyl
iodide in NaH/ tetrahydrofuran (93%) and deprotection using 1 N
HCl anhydrous ethanol (98%).
AMACE1 was designed to have some favorable properties for
our purposes, all of which have been realized. First, it possesses
a primary amine as a functional group with a low pKa of 8.2. This
enhances the ease of amino coupling AMACE1 onto electrophilic
sites (e.g., aldehydes, ketones, activated carboxyls) under aqueous
conditions, as about to be demonstrated. Second, aldehyde-
substituted scavenger supports are available to remove residual,
primary amine reagents.10,11 Third, this functional amino group
exists as an R-aminoketone, which sets up another way to remove
residual reagent: immobilized metal ion affinity chromatogra-
phy.12,13 Fourth, AMACE1 incorporates a novel electrophoric
structure which efficiently yields an N-methylamide anion under
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This work was supported by NIH Grant CA 71993 received as
a subcontract from Harvard Medical School. The authors thank
Gang Shao for valuable comments concerning the manuscript.
Contribution No. 769 from the Barnett Institute.
(10) Mort, A. J.; Zhan, D.; Rodriguez, V. Electrophoresis 1 9 9 8 , 19, 2129-2132.
(11) Kaldor, S. W.; Siegel, M. G.; Fritz, J. E.; Dressman, B. A.; Hahn, P. J.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1 9 9 6 , 37, 7193-7196.
(12) Hansen, P.; Lindeberg, G.; Andersson, L. J. Chromatogr. 1 9 9 2 , 627, 125-
135.
Received for review April 13, 1999. Accepted June 25,
1999.
(13) Shen, X.; Giese, R. W. J. Chromatogr., A 1 9 9 7 , 777, 261-265.
AC990384F
Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 72, No. 8, April 15, 2000 1801