Magna FI-IR 760 spectrometer. UV data were collected on a
Hitachi V-2001 spectrometer.
and 5 (105.9°) is reduced compared with that in 1
(113.1°), 4 (110.1°), 6 (113.2°), 7 (112.9°), and 8 (112.9°).
The para-chloro substituent in 6 yielded an unexpected
influence on product generation. A reason for the en-
hanced reactivity of 6 is a suggested thiol attack at S2,
which should depend on electron-withdrawing through-
bond effects in ortho or para positions to enhance
reactivity. There is a small reduction of electron density
at S2 when comparing the NBO positive charge in 3
(0.020) and 6 (0.017) with that in compounds 1 (0.007),
4 (0.016), 5 (0.005), 7 (0.004), and 8 (0.007) (Table 3). We
believe that the destabilizing substitution of chlorine in
the ortho or para position accounts for the increase in
the rate of thiol activation. Finally, a chemical conse-
quence from the perturbation of the sulfinyl center in 3
could be accounted for by combined through-space S-Cl
interaction and an electron-withdrawing substituent
effect responsible for increased product formation (Table
1). This is shown in 3, where unlike others in the series,
the through-bond and through-space effects both con-
tribute in the same direction to product conversion.
In conclusion, mechanistic evidence points to an elec-
tron-withdrawing chlorine substituent in the para posi-
tion or a neighboring group interaction involving lone
pair electrons on methoxy or chlorine substituents as
factors that enhance benzodithiolanone-oxide reactivity
toward thiol. Successful attempts to quantify substituent
effects have been made using an acetonitrile-water 7:3
solvent mixture, but up to now the only substrates
considered have had limited water solubility. The rela-
tionship between the substituent effect in thiol activation
of the dithiolanone-oxide heterocycle may be dramatic in
vivo because of substrate-DNA noncovalent associations
where dipolar aprotic and aqueous solvent environments
are both contributors. Using remote and nearby func-
tional groups as a mechanistic tool enables one to bias
the yield of the polysulfane products C-G. Polysulfane
autoxidation and subsequent Fenton chemistry can take
place. Oxygen radicals such as OH radical are produced
in a trace metal-dependent Fenton reaction previously
reported for the oxidative DNA cleavage by the antitumor
antibiotic leinamycin and synthetic dithiolanone-oxide
analogues.2,4,5,27,28 However, unlike compounds 1 and 3-8,
leinamycin 2 can also act as a DNA-alkylating agent
because of an intramolecular reaction of an alkene moiety
on the oxathiolane heterocycle.6,8,9,11-13,16,29
Dithiolanone-oxide Synthesis. The synthesis involved
adding a 3- or 5-substituted anthranilic acid (6.6 mmol) to a 4
mL water solution of 2 mL of concentrated HCl and NaNO2 (6.6
mmol) at 5 °C to generate the diazo compound. A separate
solution was prepared by mixing Na2S (7.3 mmol) with elemental
sulfur (7.3 mmol) at 24 °C, which was heated and made alkaline
by the addition of 10 M NaOH. Mixing the two solutions resulted
in a precipitate upon addition of HCl. The sulfurization gave
the dithiosalicylic acid derivative, which after purification was
then mixed and Zn dust in glacial acetic acid and refluxed,
yielding thiolsalicylic acid. Thiolacetic acid (0.110 mol) was
added to thiosalicyclic acid (0.005 mol) in concentrated H2SO4
at 24 °C. Oxidations of the benzo-substituted dithiolanone-oxides
were carried out with dimethyldioxirane.
Reaction of Thiol with Substituted Dithiolanone-
oxides. Reactions of 1 and 3-8 (10 mM) were carried out in
the presence of n-PrSH (20-40 mM) in 70% CD3CN-30% D2O.
The volume of the reaction mixture was 5 or 10 mL, and the
internal standard was 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene (4 mM). The
percent yield of products was determined after 15 min at 25 °C.
Reaction of 3 or 5 with n-propyl thiol in a CD3CN-D2O (1:10)
solvent mixture gave products too rapidly to discern a possible
substituent effect by NMR spectroscopy. 1H NMR data on the
dithiolanone-oxide (1, 3-8)-n-PrSH reaction provided evidence
for the formation of unsymmetrical and symmetrical sulfane
products similar to that observed previously by Gates for the
1-n-PrSH reaction.1 The assignment of unsymmetrical products
[3- or 5-substituted-2-propyl disulfanyl benzoic acid (C) and 3-
or 5-substituted-2-propyl trisulfanyl benzoic acid (D)] is based
on two sets of triplets; a downfield set at about δ 2.8 ppm (2H,
SCH2) and a downfield set at about δ 2.9 ppm (2H, SCH2),
respectively. The chemical shifts for â-methylene and methyl
protons are often obscured by reagent peaks. Downfield chemical
shifts of polysulfane neighboring protons with higher numbers
of sulfur atoms have been reported previously.30-32 In the case
for the reaction of 1 with n-PrSH, we utilized GC/MS data of
the polysulfane mixture to corroborate this method of analysis
by 1H NMR spectroscopy. The percent yields of C and D were
determined by analysis of products in the respective reaction
mixtures.
Acknowledgment. We thank Cliff Soll of the Hunter
College Mass Spectrometry Facility for help in deter-
mining the masses of some of the compounds and
Edlaine Lucien for synthetic work conducted in an early
phase of the project. The City University of New York
and PSC-CUNY provided financial support for this
work. We wish to dedicate this paper to the late
Professor Christopher S. Foote (1935-2005) who was
as an inspirational figure to us.
Experimental Section
Supporting Information Available: Characterization
data for 1, 3-8, 3C-8C, 3D-8D, and E-G and computational
data for 1 and 3-8. This material is available free of charge
Materials and Instrumentation. Reagents and solvents
[2-amino-3-methylbenzoic acid, 2-amino-3-methoxybenzoic acid,
2-amino-3-chlorobenzoic acid, 2-amino-5-methylbenzoic acid,
2-amino-5-chlorobenzoic acid, 2-amino-5-methoxybenzoic acid,
1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene, sodium nitrate, sodium sulfide, el-
emental sulfur (S8), sodium hydroxide, sodium bicarbonate, zinc
dust, hydrochloric acid solution (12 M), sulfuric acid solution (1
M), glacial acetic acid, thiolacetic acid, magnesium sulfate,
potassium bromide, acetone, ethanol, CHCl3, CDCl3, CH3CN,
CD3CN, hexane, propyl thiol] were obtained commercially and
used as received. Proton and carbon NMR data were acquired
on a Bruker 400 MHz NMR spectrometer. Mass spectrometry
data were collected on one of two GC/MS instruments, a Hewlett-
Packard GC/MS instrument consisting of a 6890 series GC and
a 5973N series mass selective detector, or a Hewlett-Packard
GC/MS instrument consisting of a 5890 series GC and a 5988A
series mass selective detector. IR data were collected on a Nicolet
JO0508191
(27) Burrows, C. J.; Muller, J. G. Chem. Rev. 1998, 98, 1109-1152.
(28) Bassett, S.; Urrabaz, R.; Sun, D. Anti-Cancer Drugs 2004, 15,
689-696.
(29) (a) Zang, H.; Gates, K. S. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2003, 16, 1539-
1546. (b) Shipova, E.; Gates, K. S. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2005, 15,
2111-2113.
(30) Zysman-Colman, E. Ph.D. Thesis, McGill University, Montreal,
Quebec, 2003.
(31) Clennan, E. L.; Stensaas, K. L. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 7911-
7917.
(32) Kustos, M.; Steudel, R. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 8056-8061.
J. Org. Chem, Vol. 70, No. 17, 2005 6971