carbonyl compounds. It has been reported6c that the reactions
of 2-PyMe2SiCH2Li with aldehydes and ketones gave the
â-hydroxysilanes without any formation of alkenes by a
Peterson-type elimination.2 However, in the case of 2,
Peterson-type olefination was found to take place, after or
concurrently with the addition, to give the corresponding
vinylsilanes stereoselectively (Scheme 2). The results are
depicted in Table 1.
direct addition/elimination sequences.7,8 For example, the
condensation of (Me3Si)2CHLi with benzaldehyde gave a
mixture of stereoisomers (E/Z ) 1.4/1).8b If the selectivities
are governed by the well-accepted syn-elimination2,7 from
the â-silyl alkoxide (A or B), the selectivity differences
between (2-PyMe2Si)2CHLi and (Me3Si)2CHLi should not
be as dramatic as it is (Figure 1). Moreover, the use of the
Scheme 2
The reactions with primary, secondary, and tertiary
aliphatic and aromatic aldehydes gave the corresponding
vinylsilanes in quantitative yields (entries 1-7). Noteworthy
is that the reaction is also applicable to the sterically hindered
aldehydes (entries 3 and 6) and bisaldehyde (entry 7).
Ketones gave the disubstituted vinylsilanes with somewhat
lower yields (entries 8-10). Presumably, proton transfer
competed with addition for enolizable ketones such as
acetophenone (entry 9), where (2-PyMe2Si)2CHLi serves as
the base. The reaction can be applied to the stereoselective
synthesis of dienylsilanes as well (entries 11-13).
Figure 1. The origin of stereoselectivity.
The extremely high stereoselectivities (>99% E) are worth
mentioning. It has been well documented that acid- or base-
catalyzed elimination from isolated â-hydroxysilanes is
highly stereoselective.7 However, this is not the case for the
more sterically demanding t-BuMe2Si group instead of a
Me3Si group only led to a slight increase in the E selectivity,
indicating that the steric factor is not a sole decisive factor
for the high selectivity.7 There must be some contribution
from the pyridyl group in the observed high stereoselectivity.
We surmise that, before the elimination of the siloxy group,
the chairlike conformer (C or D) might be involved as a
stereodetermining intermediate where the intramolecular
coordination of the pyridyl group locks the conformation.8o
Of the two, D should be preferred over C, since both silyl
and RL groups can occupy the equatorial positions. Thus
preferred D may lead to the observed E-isomer. However,
we must stress that these discussions are purely speculative
with no experimental evidence.
To assess the elimination aptitude of the 2-PyMe2Si group
in the Peterson-type elimination, we next conducted a control
experiment using 2-PyMe2SiCH2SiMe2Ph (5). As reported
previously, 5 can be prepared in 99% yield by the reaction
of 2-PyMe2SiCH2Li and PhMe2SiCl.6c The generation of
2-PyMe2SiCH(Li)SiMe2Ph was successfully accomplished
by the reaction of 5 with t-BuLi in Et2O. The carbanion thus
generated was subsequently allowed to react with benzal-
dehyde to give the PhMe2Si-substituted styrene 6 in 95%
yield (Scheme 3). The formation of a 1:1 mixture of two
(6) (a) Yoshida, J.; Itami, K.; Mitsudo, K.; Suga, S. Tetrahedron Lett.
1999, 40, 3403. (b) Itami, K.; Mitsudo, K.; Yoshida, J. Tetrahedron Lett.
1999, 40, 5533. (c) Itami, K.; Mitsudo, K.; Yoshida, J. Tetrahedron Lett.
1999, 40, 5537.
(7) Hudrlik, P. K.; Agwaramgbo, E. L. O.; Hudrlik, A. M. J. Org. Chem.
1989, 54, 5613.
(8) Although similar E selectivities for [bis(silyl)methyl]lithium were
previously reported, they are not as high as ours or not sited in the literature;
see: (a) Sakurai, H.; Nishiwaki, K.; Kira, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1973, 4193.
(b) Gro¨bel, B.-T.; Seebach, D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1974, 13, 83.
(c) Hartzell, S. L.; Rathke, M. W. Tetrahedron Lett. 1976, 2737. (d) Sachdev,
K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1976, 4041. (e) Carter, M. J.; Fleming, I. J. Chem.
Soc., Chem. Commun. 1976, 679. (f) Seyferth, D.; Lefferts, J. L.; Lambert,
R. L., Jr. J. Organomet. Chem. 1977, 142, 39. (g) Seebach, D.; Bu¨rstinghaus,
R.; Gro¨bel, B.-T.; Kolb, M. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1977, 830. (h) Gro¨bel,
B.-T.; Seebach, D. Chem. Ber. 1977, 110, 852. (i) Isobe, M.; Kitamura,
M.; Goto, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1979, 3465. (j) Fleming, I.; Pearce, A. J.
Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1980, 2485. (k) Carter, M. J.; Fleming, I.;
Percival, A. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1981, 2415. (l) Sato, Y.;
Takeuchi, S. Synthesis 1983, 734. (m) Ager, D. J. J. Org. Chem. 1984, 49,
168. (n) Takeda, T.; Ando, K.; Mamada, A.; Fujiwara, T. Chem. Lett. 1985,
1149. (o) Boeckman, R. K., Jr.; Chinn, R. L. Tetrahedron Lett. 1985, 26,
5005. (p) Ager, D. J.; East, M. B. J. Org. Chem. 1986, 51, 3983. (q) Inoue,
S.; Sato, Y. Organometallics 1986, 5, 1197. (r) Terao, Y.; Aono, M.;
Takahashi, I.; Achiwa, K. Chem. Lett. 1986, 2089. (s) Marchand, A. P.;
Huang, C.; Kaya, R.; Baker, A. D.; Jemmis, E. D.; Dixon, D. A. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 7095. (t) Kira, M.; Hino, T.; Kubota, Y.; Matsuyama,
N.; Sakurai, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1988, 29, 6939. (u) Bates, T. F.; Thomas,
R. D. J. Org. Chem. 1989, 54, 1784.
Org. Lett., Vol. 2, No. 9, 2000
1301