B. D. Smith et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 21 (2011) 5029–5032
5031
and G88C–folate (which is a site-specific conjugate) inhibit DNA
synthesis, with IC50 = 11 and 9 M, respectively. No other conju-
gate exhibited a detectable effect on DNA synthesis at a concentra-
tion of 25 M. These data are in gratifying agreement with the
l
l
results shown in Figure 4—only those folate conjugates that have
weakened affinity for RI diminish cell proliferation. Apparently, en-
hanced cellular internalization mediated by a pendant folate moi-
ety must be accompanied by RI-evasion to enable a ribonuclease to
be cytotoxic. The ramifications of this duality are the basis for on-
going work in our laboratory.
In summary, we put forth a new folate analogue, 1, that can be
used to install a folate moiety at a designated site in a protein. Un-
like random folate conjugation, site-specific folate conjugation
need not compromise protein function. Importantly, site-specific
conjugation allows for the preparation of a homogeneous toxin,
which facilitates molecular characterization and optimization.
We anticipate that folate analogue 1 could be used to create useful
site-specific folate conjugates of a variety of cytotoxins.
Acknowledgments
This Letter is dedicated to Professor Carolyn R. Bertozzi on
the occasion of her winning the 2011 Tetrahedron Young Inves-
tigator Award in Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry. This work
was supported by grant R01 CA073808 (NIH). The Biophysics
Instrumentation Facility was established at the University of
Wisconsin–Madison with Grants BIR-9512577 (NSF) and S10
RR13790 (NIH). B.D.S. was supported by Biotechnology Training
Grant T32 GM008349 (NIH). We are grateful to P. A. Leland, K.
E. Staniszewski, and K. A. Dickson for help with conjugation
and cytotoxicity protocols, and for contributive discussions. We
also thank J. E. Lee, S. M. Fuchs, M. B. Soellner, and L. D. Lavis
for advice.
Figure 3. Three-dimensional structure of the complex between RNase A (blue) and
RI (red). The location of the three residues substituted herein are shown explicitly.
Images were made with PyMol (Delano Scientific) and Protein Data Bank entry
1dfj.29
Supplementary data
Supplementary data (experimental procedures and molecular
characterization) associated with this article can be found, in the
References and notes
1. Raines, R. T. Chem. Rev. 1998, 98, 1045.
2. Arnold, U.; Ulbrich-Hofmann, R. Biotechnol. Lett. 2006, 28, 1615.
3. Lee, J. E.; Raines, R. T. BioDrugs 2008, 22, 53.
4. Fang, E. F.; Ng, T. B. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2011, 1815, 65.
5. Haigis, M. C.; Haag, E. S.; Raines, R. T. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2002, 19, 959.
6. Dickson, K. A.; Haigis, M. C.; Raines, R. T. Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. Mol. Biol. 2005,
80, 349.
Figure 4. Agarose gel-based assay of the inhibition of the enzymatic activity of
RNase A variants and folate conjugates by RI. Inhibition was assessed by visualizing
the ribonuclease-catalyzed degradation of 16S and 23S rRNA in the absence or
presence of excess RI.30,27
7. Rutkoski, T. J.; Raines, R. T. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2008, 9, 185.
8. Rutkoski, T. J.; Kink, J. A.; Strong, L. E.; Schilling, C. I.; Raines, R. T. Bioconjugate
Chem. 2010, 21, 1691.
9. Turcotte, R. F.; Lavis, L. D.; Raines, R. T. FEBS J. 2009, 276, 3846.
10. Chao, T.-Y.; Lavis, L. D.; Raines, R. T. Biochemistry 2010, 49, 10666.
11. Saxena, S. K.; Rybak, S. M.; Winkler, G.; Meade, H. M.; McGray, P.; Youle, R. J.;
Ackerman, E. J. J. Biol. Chem. 1991, 266, 21208.
12. Fuchs, S. M.; Raines, R. T. Protein Sci. 2005, 14, 1538.
13. Fuchs, S. M.; Raines, R. T. ACS Chem. Biol. 2007, 2, 167.
14. Futami, J.; Yamada, H. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2008, 9, 180.
15. Garin-Chesa, P.; Campbell, I.; Saigo, P. E.; Lewis, J. L., Jr.; Old, L. J.; Rettig, W. J.
Am. J. Pathol. 1993, 142, 557.
16. Ross, J. F.; Chaudhuri, P. K.; Ratnam, M. Cancer 1994, 73, 2432.
17. Xia, W.; Low, P. S. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 53, 6811.
18. Reddy, J. A.; Low, P. S. Crit. Rev. Ther. Drug Carrier Syst. 1998, 15, 587.
19. Atkinson, S. F.; Bettinger, T.; Seymour, L. W.; Behr, J. P.; Ward, C. M. J. Biol. Chem.
2001, 276, 27930.
20. Luo, J.; Smith, M. D.; Lantrip, D. A.; Want, S.; Fuchs, P. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997,
119, 10004.
21. Leamon, C. P.; Low, P. S. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1991, 88, 5572.
22. Kelemen, B. R.; Klink, T. A.; Behlke, M. A.; Eubanks, S. R.; Leland, P. A.; Raines, R.
T. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999, 27, 3696.
control. In contrast to random folate conjugation, site-specific
conjugation to RNase A variants with a free cysteine allows
conjugates to retain high enzymatic activity (Table 1).
We used an agarose gel-based assay to discern whether a ribo-
nuclease variant or folate conjugate is able to evade RI.30,27 We
found that only those ribonucleases modified by mutagenesis or
chemical modification at residue 88 display resistance to inhibition
by RI (Fig. 4). These data are expected from the structure of the RI–
RNase A complex (Fig. 3).
JAR cells, which are from a placental choriocarcinoma line, over-
produce a cell-surface folate receptor when maintained in folate-
depleted medium.16 In preliminary biological experiments, we
measured the ability of exogenous folate conjugates to inhibit
DNA synthesis within JAR cells. This assay reports, in effect, on
the ability of the conjugates to enter the cytosol and catalyze the
degradation of cellular RNA, which leads to apoptosis.31,32 We
found that only K41R/G88R–folate (which is a random conjugate)
ˇ
23. Kim, J.-S.; Soucek, J.; Matoušek, J.; Raines, R. T. Biochem. J. 1995, 308, 547.