TurnoVer Control of Photosystem II
J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 122, No. 21, 2000 5181
dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCC, Acros Organics) and N-hydroxysuc-
cinimide (NHS, Pierce Chemical Co.) were also used as received.
n-dodecyl-â-D-maltoside was purchased from Anatrace and used as
received. Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was performed on polymer
backed silica gel plates (60 Å, Aldrich). Column chromatography was
performed on silica gel 200-400 mesh (60 Å, Aldrich). High
performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was performed with a
computer-controlled system (Rainin, model Dynamax SD-200) with a
diode array detector on a Vydac C-18 (1 cm × 25 cm) reverse phase
column. Visible spectra were measured on a Perkin-Elmer Lambda 3B
spectrophotometer. NMR spectra were recorded on an Oxford QE-Plus
300 MHz spectrometer.
Scheme 2
as dimethylureido phenyl phenyl nitroxide (PNPDU, Scheme
2), have also been used to generate the S3 state in 75% yield
(Scheme 3).8 The ability of the redox-active herbicides to bind
tightly to the QB-binding site and accept one electron from QA
enables the formation of a two-electron charge-separated state
in high yield. Although PNPDU accepts an electron in advancing
the Mn4 cluster from the S2 to S3 state, its applicability is limited
to temperatures of g250 K owing mainly to the proton-coupling
requirement for electron transfer. One approach to produce a
double turnover at temperatures lower than 250 K is by using
metal-containing redox-active herbicides that do not involve
proton-coupling in the electron-transfer step. Herbicides that can
accept electrons at lower temperatures would allow for new
possibilities to trap and study photogenerated intermediate states
such as the S2Yz• state that has previously been studied only in
inhibited samples.9
In light of the ongoing studies to unravel structural informa-
tion about the S3 and possibly the S2Yz• states, we demonstrate
the versatility of using novel metal-containing redox-active
herbicides with an FeIII-(EDTA) electron-acceptor group linked
by a hydrocarbon spacer to a phenyldimethyl urea herbicide
for studying photochemical turnover of PSII at temperatures
below 250 K. Metal-based acceptors provide additional struc-
tural flexibility in studying the mechanisms, energetics and rates
of long-range electron transfer to the QB site. The work reported
herein also demonstrates the use of a covalent tether between
an active-site binding moiety and a redox-active moiety for
controlled transfer of electrons out of a protein active site. In a
related study, Wilker et al.10 have recently demonstrated the
design and use of photosensitizers linked by hydrocarbon spacers
to binding groups that have high affinity for the cytochrome
P450cam heme pocket. By delivering holes or electrons directly
to the active site, these charge-transfer complexes allowed the
preparation and study of redox intermediates of cytochrome
P450. We demonstrate here the use of metal complexes linked
by hydrocarbon spacers to a phenyl urea herbicide with an
affinity for the QB site to prepare and study transient states in
the PSII photocycle.
Synthesis of BOC-Protected Ethylenediamine, BOC-EN11 (1). To
a warm (45 °C) solution of ethylenediamine (34 mL, 0.51 mol) in 60
mL of THF, BOC-ON (25.0 g, 0.102 mol) in 80 mL of THF was added
dropwise continuously. The solution was stirred for 20 min, and a
yellow product was recovered after removing excess ethylenediamine
1
and THF in vacuo. Yield: 70%. H NMR in CDCl3 (ppm): δ 1.4 (9
H, s, BOC group); δ 3.0 (2 H, m, CH2); δ 3.2 (2 H, m, CH2); δ 4.0 (2
H, broad, NH2); δ 5.0 (1 H, t, N-H). Impurities due to the phenyl
groups of the BOC-ON were observed at δ 7.4 (2 H, m, aromatic); δ
7.8 (2 H, m, aromatic).
Synthesis of BOC-EN-SO2R (2).11,12 To a solution of 1,1-dimethyl-
3-[4-(chlorosulfonyl)phenyl]urea [RSO2Cl]8 (4.0 g, (15 mmol) in 150
mL of THF), 2.43 g (15 mmol) of 1 in 100 mL of THF was added
dropwise over 1 h with continuous stirring. After adding 20 mL of
water to this mixture, the solution was refluxed at 60-70 °C. After 2
h, the solution was allowed to cool to room temperature. The organic
layer was separated and washed with 2 × 5 mL portions of saturated
sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) followed by 2 × 5 mL portions of
saturated NaCl solution. The organic layer was dried over anhydrous
MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure affording a
yellowish, sticky product. Performance of TLC with a solvent mixture
of (5:5:1) ethyl acetate:hexane:methanol resulted in three bands. The
slowest moving band was deduced to be the coupled product from a
comparison with the Rf values of the starting materials. Purification
was accomplished with silica gel column chromatography using a (4
× 30 cm) column, and eluting with (5:5:1) ethyl acetate:hexane:
methanol solvent mixture. The BOC-protected product eluted as the
final band. Yield: ∼60%. TLC: Rf ) 0.23 on SiO2 with hexane:ethyl
1
acetate:methanol (5:5:1). H NMR in (CD3)2O (ppm): δ 1.4 (9 H, s,
BOC group); δ 2.9 (2 H, m, ethyl); δ 3.2 (2 H, m, ethyl); δ 3.0 (6 H,
s, N(CH3)2); δ 6.1 (1 H, s, N-H); δ 6.4 (1 H, t, N-H); δ 7.8 (4 H, q,
aromatic); δ 8.2 (1 H, s, N-H). Anal. Calcd. for C16H26N4O5S1: C,
49.7; H, 6.78; N, 14.5. Found: C, 48.5; H, 6.42; N, 14.1.
Deprotection of the BOC Group, NH2-EN-SO2R (3). 0.5 g of 2
was dissolved in 5 mL TFA/30 mL CH2Cl2 and stirred under nitrogen
for several hrs. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure
affording a yellow sticky residue that was recrystallized from methanol/
ether solution yielding a white microcrystalline product. Yield: ∼90%.
1H NMR in (CD3)2O (ppm): δ 2.5 (2 H, d, NH2); δ 3.0 (6 H, s,
N(CH3)2); δ 3.25 (2 H, m, ethyl); δ 3.9 (2 H, m, ethyl); δ 7.7 (4 H, s,
aromatic); δ 7.9 (1 H, t, N-H); δ 8.2 (1 H, s, N-H). Anal. Calcd. for
C11H18N4O3S1: C, 46.13; H, 6.33; N,19.57. Found: C, 45.26; H, 6.44;
N, 19.04.
Synthesis of FeIII-(EDTA)-EN-SO2R (4)12 (Figure 1). 400 mg
(105.6 mmol) of FeIII-(EDTA)‚2H2O13 was dissolved in 10 mL of
anhydrous DMF and stirred at 0 °C under a dry nitrogen atmosphere.
After the solution turned clear, 0.216 g (105.6 mmol) of DCC and 0.060
g (105.6 mmol) of NHS were added and stirred. After 10 min, 0.15 g
(52.8 mmol) of 3 was added followed by a few drops of triethylamine
(base) while the reaction mixture was allowed to warm to room
Experimental Section
Materials and Instruments. All reagent grade chemicals and
solvents were purchased from commercial vendors. Iron(III) nitrate [Fe-
(NO3)3‚9H2O], BOC-ON [2-(tert-butoxycarbonyloxyimino)-2-phenyl-
aceto-nitrile] and ethylenediamine were purchased from Aldrich and
used as received. Other chemicals including mono-tert-butoxycarbonyl
1,5-diaminopentane toluenesulfonic acid salt (Nova BioChem), N,N′-
(7) Guiles, R. D.; Zimmerman, J.-L.; McDermott, A.; Yachandra, V. K.;
Cole, J. L.; Dexheimer, S. L.; Britt, R. D.; Wieghardt, K.; Bossek, U.; Sauer,
K.; Klein, M. P. Biochemistry 1990, 29, 471-475.
(8) Bocarsly, J. R.; Brudvig, G. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 9762-
9767.
(9) (a) Szalai, V. A.; Ku¨hne, H.; Lakshmi, K. V.; Brudvig, G. W.
Biochemistry 1998, 37, 13594-13603. (b) Tang, X.-S.; Randall, D. W.;
Force, D. A.; Diner, B. A.; Britt, R. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 7638-
7639. (c) Szalai, V. A.; Brudvig, G. A. Biochemistry 1996, 35, 1946-
1953. (d) Boussac, A.; Rutherford, A. W. Biochemistry 1988, 27, 3476-
3483. (e) MacLachlan, D. J.; Nugent, J. H. A. Biochemistry 1993, 32, 9772-
9780. (f) Lakshmi, K. V.; Eaton, S. S.; Eaton, G. R.; Frank, H. A.; Brudvig,
G. A. J. Phys. Chem. B 1998, 102, 8327-8335.
(11) Reifler, M. J. Ph.D. Thesis, Yale University, New Haven, 1998.
(12) Ermacora, R. M.; Delfino, J. M.; Cuenoud, B.; Schepartz, A.; Fox,
R. O. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1992, 89, 6383-6387. (b) Hertzberg,
R. P.; Dervan, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 313-315. (c) Sluka, J. P.;
Griffin, J. H.; Mack, D. P.; Dervan, P. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112,
6369-6374. (d) Ebright, Y. W.; Chen, Y.; Pendergrast, S. P.; Ebright, R.
H. Biochemistry 1992, 31, 10664-10670.
(13) Basallote, M. G.; Alcala, J. M. L.; Vizcaino, M. C. P.; Vilchez, F.
G. Inorg. Synth. 1986, 24, 207-208. (b) Hoard, J. L.; Kennard, C. H. L.;
Smith, G. S. Inorg. Chem. 1963, 2, 1316-1317.
(10) Wilker, J. J.; Dmochowski, I. J.; Dawson, J. H.; Winkler, J. R.;
Gray, H. B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 90-92.