Electron Transfer Mechanism of Organocobalt Porphyrins
J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 120, No. 12, 1998 2881
SO-TOP, CEA, France. Trifluoroacetic acid was also obtained com-
mercially. Tetrabutylammonium perchlorate (TBAP), obtained from
Fluka Fine Chemical, was recrystallized from ethanol and dried in vacuo
prior to use.
kinetics to investigate the reactivity and spectroscopic properties
of singly oxidized organometallic porphyrins of the type [(TPP)-
Co(R)]+, [(TPP)Co(MeCN)]+, and [(TPP)Co(R)(L)]+ where R
) Bu, Et, Me or Ph, MeCN ) acetonitrile, L ) a substituted
pyridine, and TPP ) the dianion of tetraphenylporphyrin. The
results of this study indicate that a Co(IV) oxidation state may
be accessed upon oxidation of (TPP)Co(R) or (TPP)Co(R)(L)
under certain experimental conditions, and the high valence state
of the cobalt ion in the singly oxidized cobalt porphyrins appears
to directly or indirectly influence the rate of migration of the
σ-bonded axial ligand. This study also reports the cobalt-
carbon bond dissociation enthalpies and entropies of both (TPP)-
CoIII(R) and [(TPP)CoIV(R)]+.
Product Analysis. One equiv of [Fe(phen)3](ClO4)3 (1.0 × 10-2
M) was added to an NMR tube that contained (TPP)Co(R) (1.0 × 10-2
M) in CD3CN/CDCl3 (1:1 v/v, 0.60 cm3) under 1.0 atm of argon. The
addition of excess CF3COOH to the solution resulted in demetalation
and the porphyrin product was identified as (N-RTPP)H on the basis
1
of its H NMR spectrum.12 1H NMR measurements were performed
with a JNM-GSX-400 (400 MHz) NMR spectrometer. 1H NMR (CD3-
CN, 298 K); δ(Me4Si, ppm): (N-MeTPP)H, δ -4.08 (s, 3H, N-CH3),
0.07 (s, 1H), 7.9-8.8 (m, 8H), 9.87 (s, 1H); (N-EtTPP)H, δ 3.48 (s,
3H), 4.74 (s, 3H), 7.9-8.9 (m, 8H). The yield in each case was
determined as 100 ( 10% by comparison of the integrated signal area
with those of an internal standard (dioxane).
Experimental Section
The Evans NMR method18a was used to determine the solution
magnetic susceptibility of the paramagnetic Co(II) complex, [(N-
MeTPP)Co]+. The NMR spectrometer used in this measurement was
equipped with a high magnetic field superconducting magnet. Cor-
rection has been made to the original Evans equation18a according to
the literature.18b A capillary tube containing the solvent (CD3CN/CDCl3,
1:1 v/v, 0.2 mL), [Fe(phen)3]2+ (1.0 × 10-2 M), and tetramethylsilane
was inserted into an NMR tube which contained (TPP)Co(Me) (1.0 ×
10-2 M), [Fe(phen)3]3+ (1.0 × 10-2 M), and tetramethylsilane in CD3-
CN/CDCl3 (1:1 v/v, 0.6 mL). A diamagnetic correction for the TPP
ligand was made based on the reported value.19 The change of solvent
density with temperature was also taken into account in determination
of the solution magnetic susceptibility.20
One equiv of [Fe(phen)3](ClO4)3 (4.0 × 10-3 M) in deaerated MeCN
(0.5 mL) was added with a syringe to a sample tube sealed with a
rubber septum that contained (TPP)Co(Me) (4.0 × 10-2 M) in deaerated
CHCl3 (0.5 mL). After completion of the reaction, the gaseous products
were analyzed by GC using a Unibeads 1-S column. A commercial
standard gas from GL Science Co. Ltd, Japan, was used as a reference
and contained methane (0.99%), ethane (1.02%), propane (1.01%),
isobutane (1.00%), and butane (1.00%). The determination of the yields
were made using sample tubes of the same size after equilibrium of
the reference gas.
Spectral and Kinetic Measurements. Typically, a 10 µL aliquot
of (TPP)Co(R) (1.5 × 10-3 M) in CHCl3 or CH2Cl2 was added to a
quartz cuvette (10 mm i.d.) which contained [Fe(phen)3](ClO4)3 (5.0
× 10-6 M) in deaerated MeCN (3.0 mL). This led to an electron
transfer from (TPP)Co(R) to [Fe(phen)3](ClO4)3. UV-vis spectral
changes associated with this electron transfer were monitored using a
Shimadzu UV-2200 spectrophotometer, a Hewlett-Packard 8452A diode
array spectrophotometer, or a Hewlett-Packard 8453 diode array
spectrophotometer. All experiments were carried out in a dark cell
compartment using deaerated solutions. It was confirmed that the
thermal rates were not affected by the monitoring light.
Kinetic measurements of the electron transfer from (TPP)Co(R) to
[Fe(phen)3](ClO4)3 were carried out using a Union RA-103 stopped-
flow spectrophotometer. Deaerated MeCN solutions of (TPP)Co(R)
and [Fe(phen)3](ClO4)3 were transferred to the spectrophotometric cells
by means of a glass syringe which had earlier been purged with a stream
of argon. All kinetic measurements were carried out under deaerated
conditions. The rates of the migration reactions were followed by
spectrally monitoring the increase in absorption band intensity due to
the oxidized porphyrin product under pseudo-first-order conditions
where the concentration of [Fe(phen)3]3+ was maintained at more than
10-fold excess of the (TPP)Co(R) concentration. Pseudo-first-order
rate constants were determined by a least-squares curve fit using an
NEC microcomputer. The first-order plots of ln(A∞ - A) vs time (A∞
and A are the final absorbance and the absorbance at the reaction time,
respectively) were linear for three or more half-lives with the correlation
coefficient, F > 0.99.
Materials. Cobalt(II) tetraphenylporphyrin, (TPP)Co, was prepared
as described in the literature11 and then oxidized by oxygen in methanol
containing HCl to obtain tetraphenyl porphyrinatocobalt(III) chloride,
(TPP)CoCl, which was further purified by recrystallization from
methanol. Methylcobalt(III) tetraphenylporphyrin, (TPP)Co(Me), was
prepared from a reaction between methylhydrazine and (TPP)CoCl
followed by oxidation of the resulting intermediate by oxygen.12
Reactions involving (TPP)CoCl were performed in chloroform/aceto-
nitrile (5:1 v/v) since the solubility of (TPP)CoCl is larger in this mixed
solvent than in neat chloroform or acetonitrile. (TPP)Co(Ph) was
prepared according to literature procedures.13 (TPP)Co(Et) and (TPP)-
Co(Bu) were prepared from the reaction of (TPP)CoCl with Et4Sn or
Bu4Sn as described previously.14 Et4Sn (4.0 × 10-2 M) was added to
a chloroform/acetonitrile (5:1 v/v) solution of (TPP)CoCl (1.0 × 10-2
M), which had been deaerated with argon gas and kept in the dark.
The solution was stirred for a few hours, and the (TPP)Co(R) product
was recrystallized from methanol.
The purity of (TPP)Co(R) thus obtained was checked by elemental
1
analysis and H NMR spectroscopy. Anal. Calcd for C45H31N4Co,
(TPP)Co(Me): C, 78.71; H, 4.55; N, 8.16. Found: C, 78.42; H, 4.43;
N, 8.14. Anal. Calcd for C46H33N4Co, (TPP)Co(Et): C, 78.85; H,
4.75; N, 8.00. Found: C, 78.67; H, 4.96; N, 7.92. Anal. Calcd for
C48H37N4Co, (TPP)Co(Bu): C, 79.11; H, 5.12; N, 7.69. Found: C,
79.03; H, 5.19; N, 7.66. Anal. Calcd for C50H33N4Co, (TPP)Co(Ph):
C, 80.20; H, 4.44; N, 7.48. Found: C, 79.95; H, 4.43; N, 7.62. 1H
NMR (CDCl3/CD3CN 5:1 v/v, 298 K); δ(Me4Si, ppm) of coordinated
alkyl ligand: (TPP)Co(Me), -4.41 (s, 3H); (TPP)Co(Et), -4.93 (t,
3H, J ) 7.4 Hz), -3.46 (q, 2H, J ) 7.4 Hz); (TPP)Co(Bu), -4.64 (m,
2H, J ) 7.7 Hz), -3.54 (t, 2H, J ) 7.8 Hz), -1.36 (m, 2H, J ) 7.3
Hz), -0.73 (t, 3H, J ) 7.3 Hz); (TPP)Co(Ph), 0.37 (d, 2H, J ) 8.3
Hz), 4.63 (dd, 2H, J ) 8.3, 6.8 Hz), 5.26 (t, 1H, J ) 6.8 Hz). Proton
resonances of the porphyrin ligand were found at 7.71 (m, 12H), 8.06
(m, 8H), 8.76 (s, 8H). Since the (TPP)Co(R) derivatives are light
sensitive,15 the compounds were kept in the dark.
Tris(1,10-phenanthroline)iron(III) perchlorate, [Fe(phen)3](ClO4)3,
was prepared by oxidizing the iron(II) complex with ceric sulfate in
aqueous H2SO4.16 Acetonitrile and dichloromethane, used as solvents,
were purified and dried with CaH2 according to standard procedures.17
Spectral grade chloroform was obtained from Wako Pure Chemicals.
Pyridine and substituted pyridines (3,5-dichloropyridine, 4-cyanopy-
ridine, 3-chloropyridine, 3-picoline, 3,4-lutidine, and 4-(dimethylamino)-
pyridine) were obtained commercially and purified using standard
methods.17 Acetonitrile-d3 and chloroform-d3 were obtained from EURI
(11) Shirazi, A.; Goff, H. M. Inorg. Chem. 1982, 21, 3420.
(12) Mansuy, D.; Battioni, J.-P.; Dupre`, D.; Sartori, E.; Chottard, G. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 6159.
(13) Callot, H. J.; Metz, F.; Cromer, R. NouV. J. Chem. 1984, 8, 759.
(14) Fukuzumi, S.; Kitano, T. Inorg. Chem. 1990, 29, 2558.
(15) (a) Kendrick, M. J.; Al-Akhdar, W. Inorg. Chem. 1987, 26, 3972.
(b) Perree-Fauvet, M.; Gaudemer, A.; Boucly, P.; Devynck, J. J. Organomet.
Chem. 1976, 120, 439.
(18) (a) Evans, D. F. J. Chem. Soc. 1959, 2003. (b) Schubert, E. M. J.
Chem. Educ. 1992, 69, 62 and references therein.
(16) Wong, C. L.; Kochi, J. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 5593.
(17) Perrin, D. D.; Armarego, W. L. F.; Perrin, D. R. Purification of
Laboratory Chemicals; Pergamon Press: Elmsford, 1966.
(19) Eaton, S. S.; Eaton, G. R. Inorg. Chem. 1980, 19, 1095.
(20) (a) Hanson, E. S. Ind. Eng. Chem. 1949, 41, 99. (b) Ostfeld, D.;
Cohen, I. A. J. Chem. Educ. 1972, 49, 829.