This synthetic design is outlined in Scheme 1. It is
expected that casuarine would be produced from nitroso
element a priori was uncertain. Additionally, the presence
of a C(5) benzoate group could exert considerable influence
on the reactive conformation of the nitronate. In fact, studies
on heavily substituted nitronates show a strong sensitivity
of facial approach to nitronate conformation.11
Scheme 1
Orienting experiments indicated that the acetoxy vinyl
ether 7a, the preferred bisalkoxy dienophile in previous
studies,7 was unsuitable for a productive cycloaddition with
nitroalkene 6.12 Instead, the more reactive benzoyloxy vinyl
ether 7b7 effectively produced the desired nitronate. Unfor-
tunately, the existing synthesis of the benzoate 7b gave a
very poor yield (17%),7 so a new route had to be developed
(Scheme 2). The chiral alkoxy aldehyde 87 was converted
Scheme 2
acetal 2 by N-O bond cleavage and N-alkylation followed
by Tamao-Fleming oxidation9 of the silyl moiety. Thus,
nitroso acetal 2 possesses all the required stereocenters and
functionality for the synthesis of (+)-casuarine. With the
exception of C(7) (nitroso acetal numbering), all the remain-
ing stereocenters are established in the tandem cycloaddition.
Ketone 3 was targeted as the key intermediate as it would
allow a substrate-controlled reduction for the creation of the
center at C(7) and would arise from a tandem inter [4 +
2]/inter [3 + 2] cycloaddition of simple components 6, 7,
and 4. Most importantly, a predictable stereochemical
outcome of these events is critical for the successful synthesis
of (+)-casuarine. [4 + 2] cycloaddition of nitroalkene 66b
and Z-acyloxy vinyl ether 77should provide nitronate 5. The
required C(4)/C(5) trans relationship was expected, given
the high exo selectivity which has been demonstrated
previously with this chiral vinyl ether.7 The desired approach
of the dipolarophile in the [3 + 2] cycloaddition for the
assembly of the nitroso acetal framework was more difficult
to predict. In cases where the C(4) benzoate and the C(6)
acetal center are positioned on the same side of the nitronate
ring, the approach of the dipolarophile is exclusively on the
side opposite these substituents.6b,e,8 This outcome has been
attributed to a cooperative effect between these two substit-
uents. However, in the absence of a C(4) substituent, the
C(6) acetal center alone can direct the facial attack of the
dipolarophile to the opposite side to a significant degree.10
Since the C(4) benzoate and the C(6) acetal center are on
opposite faces of the nitronate, the dominant controlling
to silyl enol ether 9 in 99% yield as a 10/1 (Z/E) mixture.
O-Acylation with benzoyl fluoride and a catalytic amount
of TBAF (2 mol %)13 afforded the Z-vinyl ether in 81% yield
along with 6% of the undesired E-vinyl ether which was
easily separated by silica gel chromatography.
With an improved synthesis of the dienophile in hand, the
optimization of the [4 + 2] cycloaddition could be under-
taken. Combining the chiral vinyl ether (Z)-7b and the
nitroalkene in the presence of 2.5 equiv of SnCl4 provided
the nitronate 5 as a 4.8:1 mixture of diastereomers (vide infra)
(Scheme 3). We have discovered that quenching the reaction
with Et3N/MeOH at low temperature proved to be critical
to obtain the cycloadduct in a high yield. The standard
method for quenching the Lewis acid (NaOH/MeOH)
partially converted the nitronate (up to 29%) to oxime 10.
In fact, quenching with a slight excess of NaOH/MeOH led
to complete conversion of the nitronate to oxime 10 (Scheme
4).14 The [4 + 2] cycloaddition was judged to be high
yielding (81%) and occurred with modest facial selectivity
(11) Schnute, M. E. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Illinois, 1995.
(12) In CH2Cl2, extensive polymerization occurred and no nitronate was
detected. With toluene as the solvent, the nitronate was produced; however,
the yield of [4 + 2]/[3 + 2] was unsatisfactory (54%).
(13) Limat, D.; Schlosser, M. Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 5799.
(14) (a) Denmark, S. E.; Moon, Y.-C.; Cramer, C. J.; Dappen, M. S.;
Senanayake, C. B. Tetrahedron 1990, 46, 7373. (b) Colvin, E. W.;
Robertson, A. D.; Seebach, D.; Beck, A. K. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.
1981, 952.
(9) (a) Tamao, K.; Ishida, N.; Tanaka, T.; Kumada, M. Organometallics
1983, 2, 1694. (b) Tamao, K.; Ishida, N. J. Organomet. Chem. 1984, 269,
C37. (c) Fleming, I.; Henning, R.; Plaut, H. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.
1984, 29. (d) Fleming, I.; Henning, R.; Parker, D. C.; Plaut, H. E.;
Sanderson, P. E. J. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1984, 317.
(10) Denmark, S. E.; Hurd, A. R. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 3045.
1312
Org. Lett., Vol. 1, No. 8, 1999