J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 4247-4248
4247
We chose to build a heterodimeric CID based on the well-
characterized ligand-receptor pairs dexamethasone (Dex)-
glucocorticoid receptor (GR) and methotrexate (Mtx)-dihydro-
folate reductase (DHFR). Both Dex and Mtx present chemical
functionality that can be modified readily without disrupting
receptor binding.12-15 Because the interactions of both Dex and
Mtx with their respective receptors are well characterized,9,10,14,15
future characterization and optimization of the Dex-Mtx system
should also be facilitated. The rat glucocorticoid receptor (rGR)
binds Dex with a KD of 5 nM, and mutants of rGR with increased
affinity for Dex have been isolated.9 The steroid dexamethasone
has been used extensively as a cell-permeable small molecule to
regulate the activity and nuclear localization of GR fusion proteins
in vivo.10 Recently, a yeast “three-hybrid” system has been
reported in which a GR-fusion and an FKBP12-fusion could be
dimerized by the small molecule Dex-FK506.11 Likewise, DHFR
fusion proteins have been used for a variety of biochemical
applications16,17 due to Mtx’s picomolar affinity for DHFR.18 Both
Dex and Mtx are commercially available, and Mtx can be
synthesized readily from simple starting materials.
The retro-synthetic analysis of the Dex-Mtx heterodimer is
shown in Scheme 1. The synthesis is based on previous syntheses
of Dex and Mtx derivatives.12,19-21 The synthesis is designed to
allow the chemical linker between the two ligands to be varied
readily. Both ligands were introduced as thiol derivatives to a
di-halo linker. Following oxidative cleavage with periodate, Dex
was derivatized with cystamine using standard peptide coupling
reagents. The γ-carboxylate in Mtx was replaced with a thiol
simply by replacing glutamate with homocysteine. Homocysteine,
protected as the tert-butyl ester and disulfide, was coupled to
4-methylaminobenzoic acid. The resulting Dex and Mtx disulfide
derivatives were reduced to their corresponding thiols using tri-
n-butylphosphine, and the two thiols were coupled to a di-bromo
linker in a one-pot reaction. The 2,4-diamino-6-bromomethyl
pteridine was added after introduction of the dibromo linker to
simplify purification of the intermediates, and the final step was
cleavage of the tert-butyl ester. Thus, the Dex-Mtx heterodimer
was prepared from two components in eight steps in 2% overall
yield. The modular synthesis of the Dex-Mtx heterodimer will
facilitate future studies to evaluate the influence of the linker on
CID activity in different systems.
Dexamethasone-Methotrexate: An Efficient
Chemical Inducer of Protein Dimerization In ViWo
Hening Lin,† Wassim M. Abida,† Robert T. Sauer,§ and
Virginia W. Cornish*,†
Department of Chemistry, Columbia UniVersity
New York, New York 10027
Department of Biology
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
ReceiVed NoVember 29, 1999
Cell-permeable small molecules that can control cellular
processes in ViVo are integral to basic research in biochemistry
and cell biology. Isopropyl-â-D-thiogalactoside (IPTG), for
example, has been used for decades to activate gene transcription
by stabilizing a conformation of lac repressor with reduced
operator affinity. A clever extension of this approach involves
the use of dimeric ligands or “chemical inducers of dimerization”
(CIDs) to manipulate protein-protein interactions in ViVo.1-6 The
inspiration for CIDs were studies of the mechanism of action of
the natural immunosuppressants FK506 and rapamycin.7,8 It was
found that the immunosuppressant activity of both compounds
results from the fact that they dimerize two proteins that otherwise
do not interact. To generalize this molecular mechanism, Spencer
et al. showed in 1993 that two FK506 molecules tethered via
their C21 allyl groups could oligomerize proteins fused to FKBP12.
CIDs are particularly powerful because the same dimeric ligand
can be used over and over again simply by fusing the proteins of
interest to the receptors for the CID. The majority of CIDs
described to date are dimers of FK5061,3,4 or FK506-analogues,5,6
although other ligands have been reported also.2 Given the broad
utility of CIDs, we sought to design an optimized CID that could
be prepared readily from commercially available materials and
that was based on different ligand-receptor pairs. Here, we report
such a compound: a heterodimeric dexamethasone-methotrexate
molecule that can dimerize proteins efficiently in ViVo (Figure
1).
(3) Belshaw, P.; Ho, S.; Crabtree, G.; Schreiber, S. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
U.S.A. 1996, 93, 4604-4607.
(4) Diver, S.; Schreiber, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 5106-5109.
(5) Amara, J.; et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1997, 94, 10618-10623.
(6) Clackson, T.; et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1998, 95, 10437-
10442.
(7) Liu, J.; Farmer, J., Jr; Lane, W.; Friedman, J.; Weissman, I.; Schreiber,
S. Cell 1991, 66, 807-815.
(8) Brown, E.; Albers, M.; Shin, T.; Ichikawa, K.; Keith, C.; Lane, W.;
Schreiber, S. Nature 1994, 369, 756-758.
(9) Chakraborti, P.; Garabedian, M.; Yamamoto, K.; Simons, S. J. Biol.
Chem. 1991, 266, 22075-22078.
(10) Picard, D.; Yamamoto, K. EMBO J. 1987, 6, 3333-3337.
(11) Licitra, E.; Liu, J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1996, 93, 12817-
12821.
Figure 1. Yeast three-hybrid assay. A heterodimeric ligand (Dex-Mtx)
bridges a DNA binding protein-receptor protein chimera (LexA-DHFR)
and a transcription activation protein-receptor protein chimera (B42-
GR), effectively reconstituting a transcriptional activator and stimulating
transcription of a lacZ reporter gene. The levels of lacZ transcription
serve as an indicator of the efficiency of Dex-Mtx-induced protein
dimerization.
(12) Govindan, M.; Manz, B. Eur. J. Biochem. 1980, 108, 47-53.
(13) Manz, B.; Heubner, A.; Kohler, I.; Grill, H.-J.; Pollow, K. Eur. J.
Biochem. 1983, 131, 333-338.
(14) Bolin, J.; Filman, D.; Matthews, D.; Hamlin, R.; Kraut, J. J. Biol.
Chem. 1982, 257, 13663-13672.
(15) Benkovic, S.; Fierke, C.; Naylor, A. Science 1988, 239, 1105-1109.
(16) Ryan, M.; Muller, H.; Pfanner, N. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 20619-
20627.
(17) Pelletier, J.; Campbell-Valois, F.-X.; Michnick, S. Proc. Natl. Acad.
U.S.A. 1998, 95, 12141-12146.
* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
† Columbia University.
(18) Sasso, S.; Gilli, R.; Sari, J.; Rimet, O.; Briand, C. Biochim. Biophys.
Acta 1994, 1207, 74-79.
§ Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
(1) Spencer, D.; Wandless, T.; Schreiber, S.; Crabtree, G. Science 1993,
262, 1019-1024.
(19) Piper, J. R.; Montgomery, J. A. J. Org. Chem. 1977, 42, 208-211.
(20) Hart, B. P.; Haile, W. H.; Licato, N. J.; Bolanowska, W. E.; McGuire,
J. J.; Coward, J. K. J. Med. Chem. 1996, 39, 56-65.
(21) Kokuryo, Y.; et al. J. Med. Chem. 1997, 40, 3280-3291.
(2) Farrar, M. A.; Alberola-lla, J.; Perlmutter, R. M. Nature 1996, 383,
178-181.
10.1021/ja9941532 CCC: $19.00 © 2000 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 04/13/2000